Texas Speaker GOP Caucus House Vote Saturday Dec. 7th

18,919 Views | 236 Replies | Last: 7 days ago by nortex97
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Are the RINOs going to evacuate to Oklahoma with their Dem brethren?
Wearer of the Ring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Is there a roll call so we can see who is voting for whom?
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So is this correct?:

They needed 2/3rds of the vote for the first 2 ballots. Neither side got it, but Cook was ahead. Now they would only need 3/5ths, and the RINOs left to prevent a quorum?
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Send the Rangers after them. Morons.
You do not have a soul. You are a soul that has a body.

We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aTmAg said:

So is this correct?:

They needed 2/3rds of the vote for the first 2 ballots. Neither side got it, but Cook was ahead. Now they would only need 3/5ths, and the RINOs left to prevent a quorum?


Which is what the Dems did several years ago for those that recall. Some of them literally fled the state to prevent a vote.

And now the RINOs are doing it.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
According to this, it's not over:

SociallyConditionedAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Cook won 48-14.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Are the GOP obligated to vote for Cook when the session actually starts now? Or is it possible for Burrows to make a deal with democrats and steal it?
TX_COWDOC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Can you post the names of those that didn't vote?
www.southpawprecision.com
Type 07 FFL / Class 2 SOT
Nightforce Optics Dealer
AGM Night Vision Dealer
the most cool guy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aTmAg said:

Are the GOP obligated to vote for Cook when the session actually starts now? Or is it possible for Burrows to make a deal with democrats and steal it?

Based on the screenshot on the last page, it looks like they are required to vote for Cook? I'm not sure. I just want a true school choice bill. No income cap.
SociallyConditionedAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TX_COWDOC said:

Can you post the names of those that didn't vote?

I'll see what I can find.
DD88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Tale of the 26 Texas RINOs



Burrows bravely buggered off.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


So only 62 are pledged to vote for Cook? That means 25 republicans are not. And obviously the 63 democrats are not. So it seems to me that Burrows could easily do the Phelan thing and join with the democrats and appoint himself.

Am I wrong?
DD88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ALL Caucus members are bound to support the nominee.

Quote:

  • Binding Agreement: In recent sessions, the Texas House Republican Caucus has implemented a rule that binds all caucus members to support the caucus-chosen nominee during the official House vote for Speaker. This agreement is intended to prevent division within the party and ensure a united front during the Speaker election.

https://www.texaspolicyresearch.com/texas-house-speaker-selection-inside-the-process-and-republican-caucus-rules/

Enforcement of the rules is another matter, so we shall see on Jan. 14th.
aezmvp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well I have no idea how binding the agreement will be. The Dems have been released to vote for anyone but Cook. Burrows has a press conference that should be starting now. I don't have a link, I'm looking. More than enough traitorous GOP and Dems to vote for Burrows over Cook though.3
aezmvp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://house.texas.gov/videos

It might be here per Twitterati. We'll see.
chap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JFC. Republicans are f'ing *******.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Prior to this year, I haven't paid attention to local politics. Is this the same way that Phelan got the speakership? Or did he at least win the GOP caucus first?
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
chap said:




There is nothing bi-partisan about working with a Democrat. It's a guaranteed outcome of taking the leftist viewpoint.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
chap said:


We need names of the Rs that are committed to supporting this POS.
Tea Party
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Texas GOP is a joke.
Learn about the Texas Nationalist Movement
https://tnm.me
Bird Poo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SociallyConditionedAg said:

TX_COWDOC said:

Can you post the names of those that didn't vote?

I'll see what I can find.


Also interested. Thanks!
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

chap said:




There is nothing bi-partisan about working with a Democrat. It's a guaranteed outcome of taking the leftist viewpoint.
They are turncoats if they vote with him and should be treated as such when it comes to primary funding from the party. You break the caucus rules, you get no money next election should be the penalty.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
txags92 said:

YouBet said:

chap said:




There is nothing bi-partisan about working with a Democrat. It's a guaranteed outcome of taking the leftist viewpoint.
They are turncoats if they vote with him and should be treated as such when it comes to primary funding from the party. You break the caucus rules, you get no money next election should be the penalty.
I'm pretty sure Burrows (aka Dade Phelan 2.0) would chose where a bunch of that money goes.
SociallyConditionedAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TX_COWDOC said:

Can you post the names of those that didn't vote?


Keith Bell
Greg Bonnen
Brad Buckley
Dustin Burrows
Angie Chen Button
Gio
Darby
Dean
Gerdes
Geren
Harless
Cody Harris
Hefner
Hull
Ken King
Kitzmer
Lambert
Landgraff
Leach
Metcalfe
Morgan Meyer
Jared Patterson
Dade Phelan
Orr
Tepper
Van Deaver
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aTmAg said:

txags92 said:

YouBet said:

chap said:




There is nothing bi-partisan about working with a Democrat. It's a guaranteed outcome of taking the leftist viewpoint.
They are turncoats if they vote with him and should be treated as such when it comes to primary funding from the party. You break the caucus rules, you get no money next election should be the penalty.
I'm pretty sure Burrows (aka Dade Phelan 2.0) would chose where a bunch of that money goes.
If so, the party needs to change that. Anybody choosing to break caucus rules to work with democrats and subvert the caucus' elected choice for speaker should not receive any party money.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A lot of those "Republicans" are really Democrats who just run in the GOP primary because they'd never win the general as a Democrat.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SociallyConditionedAg said:

TX_COWDOC said:

Can you post the names of those that didn't vote?


Keith Bell
Greg Bonnen
Brad Buckley
Dustin Burrows
Angie Chen Button
Gio
Darby
Dean
Gerdes
Geren
Harless
Cody Harris
Hefner
Hull
Ken King
Kitzmer
Lambert
Landgraff
Leach
Metcalfe
Morgan Meyer
Jared Patterson
Dade Phelan
Orr
Tepper
Van Deaver


List of traitors.
SociallyConditionedAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The SREC just passed a resolution considering a vote for anyone but Cook a censurable act. They will also spend funds to educate voters on the resolution in the congressman's district, and encourage the Party not to accept the application to the Primary for 24 months after said vote.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

A lot of those "Republicans" are really Democrats who just run in the GOP primary because they'd never win the general as a Democrat.


So not a red state.
"Freedom is never more than one election away from extinction"
Fight! Fight! Fight!
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TexAgs91 said:

Rapier108 said:

A lot of those "Republicans" are really Democrats who just run in the GOP primary because they'd never win the general as a Democrat.


So not a red state.


Texas is a purple state and this is proof. Don't care what the POTUS results were.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexAgs91 said:

Rapier108 said:

A lot of those "Republicans" are really Democrats who just run in the GOP primary because they'd never win the general as a Democrat.


So not a red state.
Just Democrats gaming the system.

We need closed primaries and candidates cannot run in the primary unless party members for at least 5 years or longer.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TexAgs91 said:

Rapier108 said:

A lot of those "Republicans" are really Democrats who just run in the GOP primary because they'd never win the general as a Democrat.


So not a red state.
Their constituents are red as hell. They just didn't pay attention to state races.
Jock 07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hope the primary opponent against lacy hull this go round is a better candidate. She needs to be taken out.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.