aTmAg said:
So is this correct?:
They needed 2/3rds of the vote for the first 2 ballots. Neither side got it, but Cook was ahead. Now they would only need 3/5ths, and the RINOs left to prevent a quorum?
If this remains the same, this third round of voting would require only 36 votes to win the endorsement — an easy feat for Cook if the Burrows contingent does not return.
— Brad Johnson (@bradj_TX) December 7, 2024
And it’s not looking likely they will. #txlege https://t.co/aG5T9jey2O
aTmAg said:
Are the GOP obligated to vote for Cook when the session actually starts now? Or is it possible for Burrows to make a deal with democrats and steal it?
TX_COWDOC said:
Can you post the names of those that didn't vote?
There were 62 in the room on the final vote. All pledged to support the caucus endorsed candidate. The group now says they’ll be reaching out to democrats to build from there.
— Brad Johnson (@bradj_TX) December 7, 2024
https://www.texaspolicyresearch.com/texas-house-speaker-selection-inside-the-process-and-republican-caucus-rules/Quote:
- Binding Agreement: In recent sessions, the Texas House Republican Caucus has implemented a rule that binds all caucus members to support the caucus-chosen nominee during the official House vote for Speaker. This agreement is intended to prevent division within the party and ensure a united front during the Speaker election.
“The speakers race is over. I have secured enough to be speaker this next session,” @Burrows4TX says, saying the bipartisan list will be released soon. pic.twitter.com/NV52nRzl6F
— Brad Johnson (@bradj_TX) December 7, 2024
chap said:“The speakers race is over. I have secured enough to be speaker this next session,” @Burrows4TX says, saying the bipartisan list will be released soon. pic.twitter.com/NV52nRzl6F
— Brad Johnson (@bradj_TX) December 7, 2024
We need names of the Rs that are committed to supporting this POS.chap said:“The speakers race is over. I have secured enough to be speaker this next session,” @Burrows4TX says, saying the bipartisan list will be released soon. pic.twitter.com/NV52nRzl6F
— Brad Johnson (@bradj_TX) December 7, 2024
SociallyConditionedAg said:TX_COWDOC said:
Can you post the names of those that didn't vote?
I'll see what I can find.
They are turncoats if they vote with him and should be treated as such when it comes to primary funding from the party. You break the caucus rules, you get no money next election should be the penalty.YouBet said:chap said:“The speakers race is over. I have secured enough to be speaker this next session,” @Burrows4TX says, saying the bipartisan list will be released soon. pic.twitter.com/NV52nRzl6F
— Brad Johnson (@bradj_TX) December 7, 2024
There is nothing bi-partisan about working with a Democrat. It's a guaranteed outcome of taking the leftist viewpoint.
I'm pretty sure Burrows (aka Dade Phelan 2.0) would chose where a bunch of that money goes.txags92 said:They are turncoats if they vote with him and should be treated as such when it comes to primary funding from the party. You break the caucus rules, you get no money next election should be the penalty.YouBet said:chap said:“The speakers race is over. I have secured enough to be speaker this next session,” @Burrows4TX says, saying the bipartisan list will be released soon. pic.twitter.com/NV52nRzl6F
— Brad Johnson (@bradj_TX) December 7, 2024
There is nothing bi-partisan about working with a Democrat. It's a guaranteed outcome of taking the leftist viewpoint.
TX_COWDOC said:
Can you post the names of those that didn't vote?
If so, the party needs to change that. Anybody choosing to break caucus rules to work with democrats and subvert the caucus' elected choice for speaker should not receive any party money.aTmAg said:I'm pretty sure Burrows (aka Dade Phelan 2.0) would chose where a bunch of that money goes.txags92 said:They are turncoats if they vote with him and should be treated as such when it comes to primary funding from the party. You break the caucus rules, you get no money next election should be the penalty.YouBet said:chap said:“The speakers race is over. I have secured enough to be speaker this next session,” @Burrows4TX says, saying the bipartisan list will be released soon. pic.twitter.com/NV52nRzl6F
— Brad Johnson (@bradj_TX) December 7, 2024
There is nothing bi-partisan about working with a Democrat. It's a guaranteed outcome of taking the leftist viewpoint.
SociallyConditionedAg said:TX_COWDOC said:
Can you post the names of those that didn't vote?
Keith Bell
Greg Bonnen
Brad Buckley
Dustin Burrows
Angie Chen Button
Gio
Darby
Dean
Gerdes
Geren
Harless
Cody Harris
Hefner
Hull
Ken King
Kitzmer
Lambert
Landgraff
Leach
Metcalfe
Morgan Meyer
Jared Patterson
Dade Phelan
Orr
Tepper
Van Deaver
Rapier108 said:
A lot of those "Republicans" are really Democrats who just run in the GOP primary because they'd never win the general as a Democrat.
TexAgs91 said:Rapier108 said:
A lot of those "Republicans" are really Democrats who just run in the GOP primary because they'd never win the general as a Democrat.
So not a red state.
Just Democrats gaming the system.TexAgs91 said:Rapier108 said:
A lot of those "Republicans" are really Democrats who just run in the GOP primary because they'd never win the general as a Democrat.
So not a red state.
Their constituents are red as hell. They just didn't pay attention to state races.TexAgs91 said:Rapier108 said:
A lot of those "Republicans" are really Democrats who just run in the GOP primary because they'd never win the general as a Democrat.
So not a red state.