Your New FBI Director is [Kash Patel]

17,223 Views | 167 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by nortex97
FobTies
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Day 1:
Declassify the full report on John Brennan and the "Russia Collusion" findings. Then replay all of his sworn testimony. Then charge and convict him of all the illegal lying and abuse of power. Let him bring down Comey and the rest of the kabal.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FobTies said:

Day 1:
Declassify the full report on John Brennan and the "Russia Collusion" findings. Then replay all of his sworn testimony. Then charge and convict him of all the illegal lying and abuse of power. Let him bring down Comey and the rest of the kabal.


I expect Biden to pardon everyone involved in the Russian hoax.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Logos Stick said:

FobTies said:

Day 1:
Declassify the full report on John Brennan and the "Russia Collusion" findings. Then replay all of his sworn testimony. Then charge and convict him of all the illegal lying and abuse of power. Let him bring down Comey and the rest of the kabal.


I expect Biden to pardon everyone involved in the Russian hoax.
No real need to do so. Statutes of Limitations have long passed.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Logos Stick said:

FobTies said:

Day 1:
Declassify the full report on John Brennan and the "Russia Collusion" findings. Then replay all of his sworn testimony. Then charge and convict him of all the illegal lying and abuse of power. Let him bring down Comey and the rest of the kabal.


I expect Biden to pardon everyone involved in the Russian hoax.
No real need to do so. Statutes of Limitations have long passed.
FobTies
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Declassify and let non-lagacy media convict Russia Collusion architects in court of public opinion.
Ghost of Andrew Eaton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:

His margin of victory in what counts was not very small

Also, nearly every county moved to the right.

No matter how much it pains you, Trump has a mandate!


Patel is going to be confirmed.


You suck at assumptions because I voted for Trump.
If you say you hate the state of politics in this nation and you don't get involved in it, you obviously don't hate the state of politics in this nation.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I assumed nothing! You WRONGLY claimed the election was close and there is no mandate!

So, again, sorry! There is a Trump mandate!

I'm Gipper
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

Im Gipper said:

His margin of victory in what counts was not very small

Also, nearly every county moved to the right.

No matter how much it pains you, Trump has a mandate!


Patel is going to be confirmed.


You suck at assumptions because I voted for Trump.

Of course you did.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tom Fox said:

LMCane said:

dreyOO said:

I love this. Kash is damn smart and more importantly, he is knowledgeable about the tactics that will be used.

He's our best shot at rooting out the evil MFers in our DOJ. I know he's over FBI, but there's a lot he can do from that seat.
this is likely why the Senate will not confirm him


If Trump with a mandate cannot get his guys because of Rinos. You spend all 4 years targeting them and send the message.

Dems never have this issue.


You have to cut their campaign money off. If you have the power to do that, you can move them.
Ghost of Andrew Eaton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:

I assumed nothing! You WRONGLY claimed the election was close and there is no mandate!

So, again, sorry! There is a Trump mandate!
The popular vote differential was 1.7%, correct? I think you are parroting what the talking heads want you to believe but never used the word mandate before this election.
If you say you hate the state of politics in this nation and you don't get involved in it, you obviously don't hate the state of politics in this nation.
agent-maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LOYAL AG said:

I feel sorry for whoever he sexually assaulted who now has to tell her traumatic story to the whole world.
How many front doors do y'all think she has on her house? I bet it's at least 3 or 4...
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

The popular vote differential was 1.7%, correct?


Wholly irrelevant in our Republic. Pick up a copy of the constitution.


Quote:

I think you are parroting what the talking heads want you to believe


Irony level 11!

Quote:

but never used the word mandate before this election.


It's not exactly a new word. It's used by lots of people before this election! Lol

I'm Gipper
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

Im Gipper said:

I assumed nothing! You WRONGLY claimed the election was close and there is no mandate!

So, again, sorry! There is a Trump mandate!
The popular vote differential was 1.7%, correct? I think you are parroting what the talking heads want you to believe but never used the word mandate before this election.


Perhaps you can define what the term mandate means in this context then? When would one have a mandate? Why is it based on popular vote when we don't use popular vote to elect the president?
Ghost of Andrew Eaton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Logos Stick said:

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

Im Gipper said:

I assumed nothing! You WRONGLY claimed the election was close and there is no mandate!

So, again, sorry! There is a Trump mandate!
The popular vote differential was 1.7%, correct? I think you are parroting what the talking heads want you to believe but never used the word mandate before this election.


Perhaps you can define what the term mandate means in this context then? When would one have a mandate? Why is it based on popular vote when we don't use popular vote to elect the president?


This whole childish escapade started when I asked why a poster was calling it a mandate. That turned into me apparently hating Trump.
If you say you hate the state of politics in this nation and you don't get involved in it, you obviously don't hate the state of politics in this nation.
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Squat 83 said:

TexasAggie81 said:

As a former, non-administrative employee of the Bureau, I approve this message.

I knew Wray would be a joke who did virtually nothing but protect his own. Of course, he's had the blessing of Merrick Garland (the worst AG in the history of the country, including John Mitchell). Noon on January 20th can't come quick enough.

The agents with whom I am still in contact despise what the Bureau has become. And, worse yet, they are furious and embarrassed after years of partisan gamesmanship and selective prosecutions.

Go scorched earth on at least the top 3 layers of the Bureau's administration. Trust me. The good guys and gals who work there will be relieved and ecstatic. Morale will quickly and dramatically improve, and they'll be able to do what the Bureau is supposed to do at lot quicker.



How can the bad actors be cleared out?

Could some sort of purity test be applied? I'm assuming there are leftists at every level mixed in with the good guys. Obviously we need to rebuild the thing with unbiased Patriots.
That's been the number one question I've had since the election. I knew there would be agents with myopia, like there has been since, at least, January 20th of 2009. I'm pretty sure the majority of these agents were slowly reviewed and hired by the Obama administration.

You don't have an agency that big and suddenly staff it with "partisan activists" in 1 or 2 years. In order to avoid, or add, the specific employees necessary to play on the dark side of the law, that's a 10-15 year process at all levels of the agency.

To answer you question as best I can, talk to all of the interviewers since the Obama administration.

I do remember reading a very small 3-4 paragraph article in the journal pertaining to unethical and possibly illegal questions being asked by DOJ/FBI interviewers in 2010-11. I've never read, or heard, of anyone discussing it in the media or read it in a book, but I remember it.

There's going to be a ton of information being spread around by the remaining saboteurs, which are likely well above 1000 employees. They'll spread the information everywhere, the media, their Dems acolytes, their deep state masters, etc.. It will be interesting to see is Bondi and Patel can find out who it is.
Jack Squat 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thanks, makes good sense.

I hope the former agent will chime in as well.
I don't think you know me.
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I suspect it will be a huge whack of the top tier and then it'll be a multi year mole hunt.
You do not have a soul. You are a soul that has a body.

We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgBQ-00 said:

I suspect it will be a huge whack of the top tier and then it'll be a multi year mole hunt.
I would agree.

I can't imagine another way of doing it without having a massive investigation which will easily take over 1 to 2 years. Once all of the gawd awful press information and negative news blankets the world for 24 months, it's highly likely we'll lose one of, if not both, houses.

So to do it properly, its going to have to be fast and brutal, which will sacrifice many damned good men and women. It's the only way I can see to move forward quickly.

And BTW, is there any way to 'revise' the civil service negotiations with the unions. Currently, employees in DC only have to physically show themselves in their offices in DC once a month. Naturally, these same employees arrive on the last day of the month and the very first business day of the month.

Supposedly, there are a great number of DC employees who live in other parts of the country so they can live in houses that are 2500 sq. ft but don't cost $4 million dollars like they do in northern Virginia and Maryland.

I can't say I wouldn't do the same thing. I wonder how many of these DC employees also have a self-employed business on the side or just have two jobs since they only have to show up in DC once every two months.
InfantryAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If he gets rid of the top management and large footprint in the Capital Region, that will do wonders. If the agency management starts to focus on actual crime, politics becomes pretty moot.

I have worked on a few cases with FBI agents and gotten assistance from the local office. Everything has been about the crimes being investigated and there has never been anything political.

The agency I came from, and the one I currently work for, the management in DC may as well be the king of england, they're so far removed from the field. More than anything they're a hindrance because their focus is on politics instead of fighting crime.

It's similar to the army insofar as much of the "leadership" in the army is political. The closer to DC, the more political. But field offices and agents are more like companies / platoons and their soldiers.

But as you stated, the problems started under obama, so that's 15 plus years of culture change; DEI has probably compounded it. I don't know specifically how that has affected the FBI, but in other agencies it hasn't manifested itself politically (excluding office politics), only in lazy employees and risk averse mangers.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
InfantryAg said:

If he gets rid of the top management and large footprint in the Capital Region, that will do wonders. If the agency management starts to focus on actual crime, politics becomes pretty moot.

I have worked on a few cases with FBI agents and gotten assistance from the local office. Everything has been about the crimes being investigated and there has never been anything political.

The agency I came from, and the one I currently work for, the management in DC may as well be the king of england, they're so far removed from the field. More than anything they're a hindrance because their focus is on politics instead of fighting crime.

It's similar to the army insofar as much of the "leadership" in the army is political. The closer to DC, the more political. But field offices and agents are more like companies / platoons and their soldiers.

But as you stated, the problems started under obama, so that's 15 plus years of culture change; DEI has probably compounded it. I don't know specifically how that has affected the FBI, but in other agencies it hasn't manifested itself politically (excluding office politics), only in lazy employees and risk averse mangers.
No surprise there. The fish rot from the head.

Well said.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:



That's gonna leave a mark, but at this point in the process I'd rather the folks that need to be confirmed be a little more subdued. It's gonna be hard enough as it is to line up all the R senators for a confirmation vote, especially when they're being bombastic. There's several R senators that just aren't gonna go along with anything. (Although I agree with everything he said)
FobTies
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kash forgot to mention Hunter hooking up with his underage niece. His therapist discussed her obligation to go to the police after learning that. The FBI killed this story.
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Looks like Patel has the votes now and the left is melting down
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MarkTwain said:

Looks like Patel has the votes now and the left is melting down

If true. Do a great job Kash.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:


He's saying nothing that hasn't been said ad nauseum on social media already.

Also, Hunter is not in the running for the job, so what's the point other than trying to get maga riled up for the likes?

More importantly, what does this have anything to do with the position he wants and the task he'd have at hand if he got it?
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We love it. Sorry
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jeez. Mike has cheap pillows for sale. Buy one. Grieve in silence.
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bobbranco said:

Jeez. Mike has cheap pillows for sale. Buy one. Grieve in silence.


Post of the day
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
Bird Poo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The point? LOL "no spin"

Anytime Kash can remind the public how the current regime has no credibility, is completely corrupt, and a two tier justice system exists, then why not?

You have a GOP senator saying "Wray's not that bad". I'm sure they have something on him. It's how they operate and stay in power.

Don't piss on our leg and tell us it's raining.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bird Poo said:

The point? LOL "no spin"

Anytime Kash can remind the public how the current regime has no credibility, is completely corrupt, and a two tier justice system exists, then why not?

You have a GOP senator saying "Wray's not that bad". I'm sure they have something on him. It's how they operate and stay in power.

Don't piss on our leg and tell us it's raining.
The current regime is gone next month.

So, again, the point of bringing Hunter, who is not the head of the FBI, is?
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rockdoc said:

We love it. Sorry
Now that I can respect, because it seems like that's all it was meant to do: get the likes.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
Bird Poo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No Spin Ag said:

Bird Poo said:

The point? LOL "no spin"

Anytime Kash can remind the public how the current regime has no credibility, is completely corrupt, and a two tier justice system exists, then why not?

You have a GOP senator saying "Wray's not that bad". I'm sure they have something on him. It's how they operate and stay in power.

Don't piss on our leg and tell us it's raining.
The current regime is gone next month.

So, again, the point of bringing Hunter, who is not the head of the FBI, is?


To garner support from fence sitting senators by having their constituents keep them accountable.

I shouldn't have to spell this out for you. I know it's hard for you to hear about Hunter's disgusting lifestyle.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No Spin Ag said:

Rockdoc said:

We love it. Sorry
Now that I can respect, because it seems like that's all it was meant to do: get the likes.

Yep. The pendulum is swinging back. If you're not careful it will strike you in the back of your head.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bird Poo said:

No Spin Ag said:

Bird Poo said:

The point? LOL "no spin"

Anytime Kash can remind the public how the current regime has no credibility, is completely corrupt, and a two tier justice system exists, then why not?

You have a GOP senator saying "Wray's not that bad". I'm sure they have something on him. It's how they operate and stay in power.

Don't piss on our leg and tell us it's raining.
The current regime is gone next month.

So, again, the point of bringing Hunter, who is not the head of the FBI, is?


To garner support from fence sitting senators by having their constituents keep them accountable.

I shouldn't have to spell this out for you. I know it's hard for you to hear about Hunter's disgusting lifestyle.
"Hard?" I find him as disgusting of a human being as there is. Feel free to provide a post where I supported or defended him. I'll wait.

Also, how does bringing up Hunter have constituents hold their senators accountable for Patel's position? Where's the direct connection?
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.