CampSkunk said:

---

"She might be the reason we tie the knot".

I guess it is pro-family if you might get married after getting the live-in pregnant.

---

The only reason this didn't occur for many many many couples is simple dumb luck.

I'd venture to guess that over 90% of unmarried couples have had that "I'm late conversation"

CampSkunk said:

---

Of course. It is pro-family. It's just not the most pro-family it could have been.

---

True, I'll take what I can get these days though. I do like that it is pro-life...given that we are flooded with the opposite messaging from big companies and woke orgs these days.

Ag In Ok said:

---

Some would use a Time Machine to avoid mistakes in high school, make the first move on their crush, join the military, or buy a lotto ticket. I would take it back to day one with our oldest and do it all over again. Even if i had my soft heart as an older guy the whole time.

---

Same. I would not risk changing anything before she was born as even the tiniest changes in the past could have massive ripple effects and compromise my chance at meeting her. Hell, if we had had intercourse just a minute or two later, instead of the exact time we did, almost 100% chance It's some other kid and not the magical one I have right now. I'd still love them, I'm sure they'd be great, but I could never risk that. I'd go right back to the elevator ride up to the Labor and Delivery unit of Memorial City if you gave me a time machine.

False

Of course, for some of us less sensitive neanderthal brutes, this type of ad might work better:


FWIW, that's from Ford's F100 Pickup ad 'Scenes from Mr Majestyk,' the movie starring Charlie Bronson.

Nonregdrummer09 said:

---

Right in the wake of Jaguar's disaster of an ad, Volvo kills it with this 3:46 ad.

Watch out girl dads.

While Jaguar is pushing debauchery, Volvo just put out the most moving, pro-family, pro-life car ad of all time.

This is the way.

pic.twitter.com/kgjGa2oCJa

— Cabot Phillips (@cabot_phillips) November 21, 2024

---

And with a non-white family, but not going "WOKE!!!" while doing it.

This is definitely the way.

It is not hinted at all and he is completely wrong. At 2:22 the narrator says, "Who she adores..." and it clearly shows her in a romantic situation with a guy.

Slicer97 said:

---

That's nice.

Still have no desire to own or drive a Volvo.

---

I wish they had a better name.

CampSkunk said:

---

"She might be the reason we tie the knot".

I guess it is pro-family if you might get married after getting the live-in pregnant.

---

Was just about to point that out.

"We're having a baby, Mom! I might marry her, not sure yet"

Nonregdrummer09 said:

---

Nanomachines son said:

---

Ghost91 said:

---

Mixed race kiss at 2:25, I'm out.






{I keed, I keed}

---

That and a lesbian relationship for the daughter. This is basically an early subversive ad from the 1990s. The fact that people are glossing over that doesn't make it not subversive and you are still tacitly accepting this by giving the entire ad approval.

Outside of the above the ad is great and is a very good short film. There was no reason at all to include the above beyond subversion and demoralization.

---

Where is this hinted at?

---

It isn't since she is with a guy when the line is spoken.

If you look at his posting history, you'll understand he sees "subversion and demoralization" in everything.

They are Chinese…pass

CampSkunk said:

---

"She might be the reason we tie the knot".

I guess it is pro-family if you might get married after getting the live-in pregnant.

---

Yeah, that was one of the things I could never get behind when I lived in Australia.

We have a couple of kids so now we're going to get married.

If you weren't sure, why were you having the kids?

Not a real ad, but it should have been

If this is the second part of the Jaguar advertisement

It would go down as one of the greatest advert campaigns of all time

This would perfectly capture the energy in the room
pic.twitter.com/ZytL6DxWji

— RŌNIN (@ronin21btc) November 23, 2024

Ghost91 said:

---

Mixed race kiss at 2:25, I'm out.






{I keed, I keed}

---

You might be kidding but I'm not

Nanomachines son said:

---

Ghost91 said:

---

Mixed race kiss at 2:25, I'm out.






{I keed, I keed}

---

That and a interracial relationship for the daughter. This is basically an early subversive ad from the 1990s. The fact that people are glossing over that doesn't make it not subversive and you are still tacitly accepting this by giving the entire ad approval.

Outside of the above the ad is great and is a very good short film. There was no reason at all to include the above beyond subversion and demoralization.

---

zephyr88 said:

---

Tramp96 said:

---

Porsche knows how to advertise as well...

---

---

Yall are crazy people

Didnt Volvo get bought out by a Chinese company a while back?

Does super weird **** like this work on consumers?

CampSkunk said:

---

"She might be the reason we tie the knot".

I guess it is pro-family if you might get married after getting the live-in pregnant.

---

you don't celebrate the sin but you celebrate the life. If you truly believe God is the author of life then all life should be celebrated and protected regardless of the sinful act that created that life.

ABATTBQ11 said:

---

CampSkunk said:

---

"She might be the reason we tie the knot".

I guess it is pro-family if you might get married after getting the live-in pregnant.

---

The "For Life" when the car doesn't hit a pregnant woman and take out her unborn baby will probably explode some heads.

---

The next commercial will have the Volvo stopping a bank robbery, catching someone falling out of a plane, or performing life-saving surgery. And people will get something in their eyes or their allergies will flare up.

doubledog said:

---

I cannot speak for women and LGBT+++ and I am not a marketing guru (although I have watched Mad Men twice) and I can tell you that men buy an idea, a dream, a promise and/or a statement (thus the chick car and man mobile). If you want to sell to men do not pull a Bud-light or Jaguar... All I have to say.

---

This is the only Porsche I could ever afford. This was when the SO and I were married in July, 1973 in Grand Teton National Park. If the high powered, high priced Porsches were proportionally better in performance, I couldn't stand to own one. I would have killed myself. This thing was a blast to drive.

Ghost91 said:

---

Mixed race kiss at 2:25, I'm out.






{I keed, I keed}

---

GO WOKE MEANS GO BROKE

I bought a 1982 Volovo Turbo, new. Loved it. that back door from the trunk to hold my snow skis was great.

Fin to drive and feeling safe/

Then, I made a change because I was getting married to a man with two kids who were young not to have toddler seats. So I needed a four door.

Went with Acura Integra, 1986) four door, manual, and that was a rocket. Getting to a hundred MPH was easy. Damn great car.