RONA Ag said:
LOYAL AG said:
RONA Ag said:
I mean RFK stating that "there are no safe and effective vaccines" is probably the only thing that should be required to eliminate him from contention. Way too much copiom around here about some of these dog **** cabinet appointments
First I need your to prove that statement. He's spoken out against vaccines in some cases and said some controversial things buts he's on the record as having taken and given to his kids all the "normal" vaccines and has been clear he isn't anti-vaccine in general.
Second his understanding of his instructions from Trump were reported by BBC as "Speaking in an NPR interview this week, Kennedy said Trump had given him three "instructions": to remove "corruption" from health agencies, to return these bodies to "evidence-based science and medicine", and "to end the chronic disease epidemic"."
The system is absolutely corrupt with the FDA being beholden to corporate food producers and Big Pharma. Can he change that in four years? I don't know. Are you aware of anyone else even willing to speak out in this manner and try?
The US is a fascist nation with the corporations having completely taken over and Trump is going to try and take it back by implementing a cadre of outsiders. They're going to get criticized by the establishment because those same corporations that own the food and drug companies own the media. For my part I don't trust any of them and I'm willing to support him fighting back.
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2023/12/15/exp-robert-kennedy-junior-rfk-2024-election-biden-trump-vaccines-121511aseg1-cnni-politics.cnn?cid=ios_app
He says it and then deflects it in the interview. I agree the FDA is corrupt and we need a shakeup. I do not think a career Enviromental lawyer who has a questionable past and low functioning morals would be the one to do it
I just watched this, and all I can say to you is WOW! You are a very troubled person if you cannot acknowledge what he was trying to say both in the hit job attempt from CNN as well as the original clip that she referred to and showed.
There was no attempt to deflect anything in his answer. The CNN reporter's original premise is misleading at best, and is more accurately described as a gross misrepresentation.
So let me break it down to you in the elementary terms that you apparently require in order to understand what RFK was saying:
The whole concept of live vaccines is that you are given a small dose of the live pathogen in order to introduce your body to the pathogen, where it can then develop antibodies to fight the pathogen. SO YOU ARE EXPOSING YOUR BODY TO THE PATHOGEN - albeit a small dose. And guess what, sometimes people overreact to the vaccine. But as RFK explicity said, the overall benefit outweighs the harm to a few folks as a whole, so he is not ANTI-vax.
Just as chemo or immunotherapy kills both healthy cells as well as the cancer. Sometimes the overall benefit outweighs the harm. But for my 91 year old father, chemo is counterproductive because it will kill him before the cancer will.
This is NOT hard. And by the way, provide some specific examples of "questionable past" and "low functioning morals". All I am seeing from you is continued pot shots from the cheap seats.
