Trump Suing NYT, CBS and Others for $10 Billion Alleging Defamation and PoliticalBias

6,050 Views | 85 Replies | Last: 9 days ago by e=mc2
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doubt it goes anywhere, but we shall see... I bet the discovery would be pretty interesting.

Charpie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
To prove this, he would have had to lose the election, no?

1st amendment be damned.
zephyr88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I hope he gets every single penny.
RikkiTikkaTagem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Charpie said:

To prove this, he would have had to lose the election, no?

1st amendment be damned.


Or I don't know, somebody maybe trying to kill him…twice
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Charpie said:

To prove this, he would have had to lose the election, no?

1st amendment be damned.


The 1st amendment is not in play here.
Charpie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RikkiTikkaTagem said:

Charpie said:

To prove this, he would have had to lose the election, no?

1st amendment be damned.


Or I don't know, somebody maybe trying to kill him…twice
That's on the media? Using your logic, all the crap being said about the other side would have the exact same merit.

This just feels like a really slippery slope, that's all.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He could be doing it to expose the belly of the beast. Public reaction could provide the kill shot.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Charpie said:

RikkiTikkaTagem said:

Charpie said:

To prove this, he would have had to lose the election, no?

1st amendment be damned.


Or I don't know, somebody maybe trying to kill him…twice
That's on the media? Using your logic, all the crap being said about the other side would have the exact same merit.

This just feels like a really slippery slope, that's all.


It's not slippery at all. Individuals sue other individuals and organizations all the time for libel and slander.
Jack Boyette
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Charpie said:

RikkiTikkaTagem said:

Charpie said:

To prove this, he would have had to lose the election, no?

1st amendment be damned.


Or I don't know, somebody maybe trying to kill him…twice
That's on the media? Using your logic, all the crap being said about the other side would have the exact same merit.

This just feels like a really slippery slope, that's all.


Except it doesn't "happen on both sides." These networks have knowingly lied, defamed, and attempted to ruin him for years, and were paid to do it.
bonfarr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Is his attorney filing the suit? The guy that was nominated for Asst AG? I would think that would be problematic if he gets confirmed.
Disclaimer: Views expressed in this post reflect the opinions of Texags user bonfarr and are not to be accepted as facts or to be accepted at face value.
Get Off My Lawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Charpie said:

To prove this, he would have had to lose the election, no?

1st amendment be damned.
Damages could be campaign expenses needed to counter their lies, down ballot losses that impact his ability to get legislation passed, etc.
IDaggie06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
My assumption is he is doing this to put them on notice in hopes it will help reduce their bias and propaganda lies while he is president. They will need to think twice before they do more Russia Russia Russia type lies as it will only help Trumps chances to win this.
DTP02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't see the point in this. It's next to impossible to win these suits for someone like Trump.
Change Detection
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It seems as the MSM was constantly lying, you see that on the View everyday. I really don't think Fox or the right leaning news outlets kept pushing what everybody knows to be false. The whole Russia narrative was untrue and most folks knew that, yet they kept pushing that false story.

I really hope something goes forward and the "Yellow Journalism" crap just gets cleaned up. Free speech is one thing, Telling the while country a lie via a platform needs to be assessed.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DTP02 said:

I don't see the point in this. It's next to impossible to win these suits for someone like Trump.


You assume he's doing it to win it.
Get Off My Lawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DTP02 said:

I don't see the point in this. It's next to impossible to win these suits for someone like Trump.
Nah. It'd be easy. Just file it in Abilene.
Charpie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Makes sense
lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
IDaggie06 said:

My assumption is he is doing this to put them on notice in hopes it will help reduce their bias and propaganda lies while he is president. They will need to think twice before they do more Russia Russia Russia type lies as it will only help Trumps chances to win this.
Would Trump be able to use ongoing litigation against those media outlets to justify excluding them from the White House? And by extension the press briefings?
javajaws
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DTP02 said:

I don't see the point in this. It's next to impossible to win these suits for someone like Trump.


You don't win if you don't even try.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That motive would be hard to reconcile against a free speech initiative.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
the CBS lawsuit was filed last month.


not seeing an actual lawsuit on the others at this point. just a letter.
CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dumb Trump
fredfredunderscorefred
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Charpie said:

RikkiTikkaTagem said:

Charpie said:

To prove this, he would have had to lose the election, no?

1st amendment be damned.


Or I don't know, somebody maybe trying to kill him…twice
That's on the media? Using your logic, all the crap being said about the other side would have the exact same merit.

This just feels like a really slippery slope, that's all.


Alex jones gets sued for hurting feelings and is bankrupt now after a billion dollars awarded
Trump denies accusations from a certified loon making 40 year old allegations with no facts to back them up..sued for slander

Etc etc. all "1st amendment be damned"

The left has put more oil on this slippery slope than at a diddy freak off
geoag58
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Charpie said:

To prove this, he would have had to lose the election, no?

1st amendment be damned.


Who cares. I bet Trump would be extremely happy if the entire country, in a very public trial, gets to see this nest of marxist rats exposed.
Fight against the dictatorship of the federal bureaucracy!
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He'll have to get past a motion to dismiss first.
Jack Boyette
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CDUB98 said:

Dumb Trump


You're completely wrong.

If this exposes communications that show who pushed them, paid them, and how, it has a chance to reform the media. That's a huge deal.

Quit with the nice guy routine. That's over, thank God.
DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Make them play defense. Even if not successful, it's better to put them on their heels
JD Shellnut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Get Off My Lawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
lb3 said:

IDaggie06 said:

My assumption is he is doing this to put them on notice in hopes it will help reduce their bias and propaganda lies while he is president. They will need to think twice before they do more Russia Russia Russia type lies as it will only help Trumps chances to win this.
Would Trump be able to use ongoing litigation against those media outlets to justify excluding them from the White House? And by extension the press briefings?
I want them to eliminate the press pool entirely. During an (R) presidency they seek fame from gotcha questions and dishonest framing. During a (D) presidency they lob softballs for the appearance of accountability but the secretary dodges any question which demands a substantive answer. So it's a facade of a bygone era when the 4th estate had principles & only nostalgia and a relatively recent "tradition" make us think it should continue.

Instead the press secretary should give regular (daily / weekly) updates & schedule senior admin officials to long form interviews with media interviewers of numerous stripes. The Jim Acosta who flings a question from a pool of his peers would be very different in a 3 hour conversation with RFK Jr. that was being broadcast live* without edit on X, YouTube, Rumble, & CSPAN.
JD Shellnut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fredfredunderscorefred said:

Charpie said:

RikkiTikkaTagem said:

Charpie said:

To prove this, he would have had to lose the election, no?

1st amendment be damned.


Or I don't know, somebody maybe trying to kill him…twice
That's on the media? Using your logic, all the crap being said about the other side would have the exact same merit.

This just feels like a really slippery slope, that's all.


Alex jones gets sued for hurting feelings and is bankrupt now after a billion dollars awarded
Trump denies accusations from a certified loon making 40 year old allegations with no facts to back them up..sued for slander

Etc etc. all "1st amendment be damned"

The left has put more oil on this slippery slope than at a diddy freak off

rocky the dog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Elections are when people find out what politicians stand for, and politicians find out what people will fall for.
4stringAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hope he wins. The media needs to be brought to heel in some way. They are no longer reporting news but rather political opinions slanted heavily to one side disguised as news. 60 Minutes edited a clip of Kamala to make her look better to directly influence the election.
NTAS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Charpie said:

RikkiTikkaTagem said:

Charpie said:

To prove this, he would have had to lose the election, no?

1st amendment be damned.


Or I don't know, somebody maybe trying to kill him…twice
That's on the media? Using your logic, all the crap being said about the other side would have the exact same merit.

This just feels like a really slippery slope, that's all.
it does feel like a slippery slope that we have gone very far down. Maybe this lawsuit will stop the journalism rot in this country!
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Charpie said:

To prove this, he would have had to lose the election, no?

1st amendment be damned.
He's suing in his private capacity, which he is entitled to do.
This has nothing to do with the 1st amendment.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Charpie said:

RikkiTikkaTagem said:

Charpie said:

To prove this, he would have had to lose the election, no?

1st amendment be damned.


Or I don't know, somebody maybe trying to kill him…twice
That's on the media? Using your logic, all the crap being said about the other side would have the exact same merit.

This just feels like a really slippery slope, that's all.
How much has CBS et al claimed they've contributed to the Harris campaign? I mean, they're either claiming to be neutral or they made a massive contribution to her campaign.
Last Page
Page 1 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.