Trump Suing NYT, CBS and Others for $10 Billion Alleging Defamation and PoliticalBias

6,105 Views | 85 Replies | Last: 12 days ago by e=mc2
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FTAG 2000 said:

BMX Bandit said:

FTAG 2000 said:



Or as part of settlement, they all have to admit they lied to the American people.
let us know how that turns out.


There's prefeeent from the Sandman case. They don't have to say they lied but admitting their stories weren't rooted in fact would be enough.

Calling someone Hitler and then saying 'oh first amendment!' Is bull*****
not quite following you on the hitler thing. that is not what the actionable statement in the Sandmann case was. and we haven't seen this Trump lawsuit, but I guarantee you its not over calling him hitler.

where did you see the media admitted the stories weren't rooted in fact? everything I saw said it was confidential terms, and generally in a settlement neither side admits or denies liability

Get Off My Lawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HTownAg98 said:

FTAG 2000 said:

BMX Bandit said:

FTAG 2000 said:



Or as part of settlement, they all have to admit they lied to the American people.
let us know how that turns out.


There's prefeeent from the Sandman case. They don't have to say they lied but admitting their stories weren't rooted in fact would be enough.

Calling someone Hitler and then saying 'oh first amendment!' Is bull*****
It's not bull****, because calling someone Hitler is an opinion, and opinions are protected speech.
…theres also the wrinkle about broadcast licenses. The FCC has authority over the MSM that they don't have over independents, and they agree to abide by standards that are tighter than the 1st amendment. At a minimum their broadcast licenses should be called into question.

Now that I think of it… appoint Alex Jones as head of the FCC!!!
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This wouldn't fall under the purview of the FCC.
2023NCAggies
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump has single handily taken out the legacy MSM in 8 years. It has just been BRUTAL for them all since he announced.

CNN may be the first to collapse, so Fing glorious
DTP02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Right now most people recognize that the media had its thumb on the scale against Trump. If he loses this case, which he very likely will, it gives them some cover they didn't have.

Just like the half-arsed legal challenges to the 2020 election which failed obscured the very real circumstances with the Covid-excused mail-in ballot laxity from getting due attention.

The main thing that could reform the media is public opinion turning against it so heavily. We're already there.

AggiePops
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Need to widen the suit. EVERY media outlet from both sides of the fence is biased. As to defamation he needs to be careful what he wishes for since he did plenty of defaming himself.
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Science Denier said:

We are told that if the media lies, then sue them. Don't censor their lies.

Now, they outright lie and are caught. So, someone sues and it's dumb" and "slippery slope".

LMAO!!
And suddenly libs care about the 1st amendment
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BMX Bandit said:

FTAG 2000 said:

BMX Bandit said:

FTAG 2000 said:



Or as part of settlement, they all have to admit they lied to the American people.
let us know how that turns out.


There's prefeeent from the Sandman case. They don't have to say they lied but admitting their stories weren't rooted in fact would be enough.

Calling someone Hitler and then saying 'oh first amendment!' Is bull*****
not quite following you on the hitler thing. that is not what the actionable statement in the Sandmann case was. and we haven't seen this Trump lawsuit, but I guarantee you its not over calling him hitler.

where did you see the media admitted the stories weren't rooted in fact? everything I saw said it was confidential terms, and generally in a settlement neither side admits or denies liability



Hitler reference is in relation to Trump, not Sandman. But they tried to destroy that kid as a racist without any proof.

As I recall it, for the Sandman settlement they paid a confidential settlement and also went back and edited stories to include proper context.

richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BMX Bandit said:

FTAG 2000 said:

BMX Bandit said:

FTAG 2000 said:



Or as part of settlement, they all have to admit they lied to the American people.
let us know how that turns out.


There's prefeeent from the Sandman case. They don't have to say they lied but admitting their stories weren't rooted in fact would be enough.

Calling someone Hitler and then saying 'oh first amendment!' Is bull*****
not quite following you on the hitler thing. that is not what the actionable statement in the Sandmann case was. and we haven't seen this Trump lawsuit, but I guarantee you its not over calling him hitler.

where did you see the media admitted the stories weren't rooted in fact? everything I saw said it was confidential terms, and generally in a settlement neither side admits or denies liability
Your statement,"and we haven't seen this Trump lawsuit" is an important fact.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Charpie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No he had it right.
whoop1995
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
doubledog said:

Charpie said:

To prove this, he would have had to lose the election, no?

1st amendment be damned.
CBS will need to produce the entire unedited 60minutes puff piece on Harris. That alone will be worth the cost of a trial/investigation.


This ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^. All the bias is on the editing room floor. manufactured tapes of interviews is not reporting.
I collect ticket stubs! looking for a 1944 orange bowl and 1981 independence bowl ticket stub as well as Aggie vs tu stubs - 1926 and below, 1935-1937, 1939-1944, 1946-1948, 1950-1951, 1953, 1956-1957, 1959, 1960, 1963-1966, 1969-1970, 1972-1974, 1980, 1984, 1990, 2004, 2008, 2010
Danny Vermin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Honestly, he should file everything possible in Red areas with Red judges. Don lemons rant was about Elon filing things In Tarrant County. F them all.
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Charpie said:

No he had it right.
Great White Buffalo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It would not shock anyone if under the MSM tree roots the Clintons, Obamas, and Bidens were feeding these poisonous roots.

Just so they can continue to be invited to the white house for their dinners, booze, Hunter's cocaine, photos, pillow fights, sleep overs, and who knows what else they receive for spreading their false garb to the public viewing mice that will believe it.

I'm hoping their attitude will change from this exercise and their wings get clipped. Will be nice to see them go through the same countless hours and $$ Trump had to waste for being a threat to the swamp.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Charpie said:

To prove this, he would have had to lose the election, no?

Or get shot at
e=mc2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Danny Vermin said:

Honestly, he should file everything possible in Red areas with Red judges. Don lemons rant was about Elon filing things In Tarrant County. F them all.


I believe this is being filed in Amarillo.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.