Now the republicans need to be careful of falling victim to the same thing.
Yes sorry, I suck at writing4 said:2023NCAggies said:
I think I heard someone say there has been 80k purged due to DEI and Hegseth will offer them their full pay for amount of time out and resume status of where you were when pushed out.
If that number is correct, that is Fing ridiculous
That makes zero sense and is the opposite of everything Hegseth has ever said in regard to dei and the military.
Edit... I think you are trying to say that non dei employees were let go and will be brought back
Big_Time_Timmy_Jim said:
If you're unsure if you're on the list or not....you're on the list.
Always the worst takes. You're just so far off here that it isn't even worth trying to help you understand.BluHorseShu said:How exactly would one be confident they're not? Can the predict how they are perceived politically 100%? My guess is that anyone who wants to stay employed there likely has some anxiety. Certainly those who are overtly political at their job should be more anxious.Big_Time_Timmy_Jim said:
If you're unsure if you're on the list or not....you're on the list.
So I'm assuming they'll only fire those that are know to be more liberal leaning and vocal about it than those are are conservative but vocal about it.
I thought the whole purpose was to root out people who express political bias in there jobs, from either end. Otherwise its going to be a huge turnstile of new employees every time a new party is in the WH. That's common at the top levels but I'd think rather inefficient in the masses at the lower levels.
every idiot put into place by the apocryphal MilleyDallasAg 94 said:
That's what happens when you govern like the other side will never regain power.
Oopsie.
Why so many? U.S. had less than 20 four star generals in WW2.LMCane said:
there are now FORTY FOUR 4 Star Generals
In the Civil War with 620,000 dead Americans there were fewer!
I agree to as a matter of general principle, but if the "Republican" way of running the US armed forces is to have them retrench and focus on their core missions of killing people and breaking things in their respective air/land/sea/space arenas, that's not partisan. Turning the military into a social experiment was the aberration; correcting that isn't "partisan".rathAG05 said:
Now the republicans need to be careful of falling victim to the same thing.
There will be enough whistleblowers coming forward so that all those that are guilty in weakening our military will see "justice".1836er said:I'm choosing to hope that the Trump campaign was anticipating this and has already undertaken contingency measures to ensure that the relevant info has already been secured for future reference. (Need to do the same in DOJ/State as well)aggiehawg said:
I love the use of "we are archiving it." Saw that in Maricopa County right before the Cyber Ninja audit was ordered by a judge to start. Election data was "archived" and then an Ooopsie! we lost the archived files.
Even during WW II, we never had this many four star generals.LMCane said:
there are now FORTY FOUR 4 Star Generals
In the Civil War with 620,000 dead Americans there were fewer!
What about just general defense of the use and preventing our enemy's from attacking and mitigating threats or testing equipment that aid in the same? I'm pretty sure the DoD's mission is just a little bit more than "killing and destroying".American Hardwood said:
No, the purpose is not to fire people because of their political beliefs, it is to fire people who implement stupid ass programs that aren't a part of the military's primary function of killing the enemy and destroying their stuff.
Its okay if you don't have the ability to form a cogent response. You could save your time and just response with "I don't like your posts"....or maybe just not reply if you can't come up with something. No one would know that you don't. But when you keep replying with this, you let everyone know.redcrayon said:Always the worst takes. You're just so far off here that it isn't even worth trying to help you understand.BluHorseShu said:How exactly would one be confident they're not? Can the predict how they are perceived politically 100%? My guess is that anyone who wants to stay employed there likely has some anxiety. Certainly those who are overtly political at their job should be more anxious.Big_Time_Timmy_Jim said:
If you're unsure if you're on the list or not....you're on the list.
So I'm assuming they'll only fire those that are know to be more liberal leaning and vocal about it than those are are conservative but vocal about it.
I thought the whole purpose was to root out people who express political bias in there jobs, from either end. Otherwise its going to be a huge turnstile of new employees every time a new party is in the WH. That's common at the top levels but I'd think rather inefficient in the masses at the lower levels.
The Kraken said:
Why does Breitbart show a photo of Gen Milley? He's been retired for over a year now.