MAP gatherings

12,201 Views | 184 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by oh no
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MAP = minor attracted person, aka pedo. I guess MAP gatherings are a thing now. First I've heard of it. And no, it's not some support group for those trying to recover. I saw the ad and it was sick..

How long until they are a protected class and it's no longer illegal?

TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
> MAP = minor attracted person

Doublespeak again.

And not all police need to be funded.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
police should set up MAP gathering honeypots just so they can arrest every single person that shows up.
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If residents don't like it they should quit electing the idiot officials that hire and staff these public jobs.

It's been said often, but you get what you elect.
Get Off My Lawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"tHeRE iS nO sLiPpErY slOPe!"
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I might be OK with labeling people as MAP in the same way we lable people with drug addictions, xtreme pyromaniacs, homicidal tendencies, or major schizophrenia problems. It is perfectly acceptable to diagnose people with a dangerous mental disease, help them seek treatment, and protect society from their choices.
normalhorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anyone that identifies as a "MAP" should be gathered up, legs anchored in a bucket of concrete and dumped over the side of a bridge into the deepest water possible

There is no justification for this behavior. At all. C'mon CM's, fight me over it….

IndividualFreedom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
When dads start whipping MAP arse, it is up to us to be at that court case demanding all charges are dropped.
Bondag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This was a South Park episode 20 years ago.
Muktheduck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We just want to make sure people feel safe getting together, no matter what they're getting together to do"

Bull****, if a bunch of straight white men met together to discuss pre-vat Catholicism they'd invite antifa into the building and hand out bike locks
Eso si, Que es
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusterAg said:

I might be OK with labeling people as MAP in the same way we lable people with drug addictions, xtreme pyromaniacs, homicidal tendencies, or major schizophrenia problems. It is perfectly acceptable to diagnose people with a dangerous mental disease, help them seek treatment, and protect society from their choices.
I agree that there is a distinct difference of having an urge and acting on the urge. While I could never understand this urge, I also couldn't understand the urge to use meth.

I just don't see a gathering helping these people. Send in project veritas and lets see if they are discussing how to help each other to deal with their urges or if they are teaching each other how to act on these urges while avoiding detection.
normalhorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If you were to make a list of any of these court proceedings, I'd show up and be more than happy to boogaloo
McInnis 03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Don't use their preferred term. That's a means of normalization. There is nothing normal about being a pedophile. They're using the long game to try and make it acceptable and you have to fend that off as much as possible.

Children are off limits sickos.
Fatboy Thaddeus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fast-tracking the MAP movement might just be the Trump team's October surprise. Stay tuned.
Sharpshooter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Fatboy Thaddeus said:

Fast-tracking the MAP movement might just be the Trump team's October surprise. Stay tuned.
If by "fast tracking" you mean "outing," I am with you.
Rocag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well don't these people, assuming they've committed no crimes, have the right to free speech and assembly?

Personally I don't think people pick who they're attracted to, so the idea that someone could naturally be attracted to people under the legal age seems plausible to me. Not that it would make any kind of sexual contact with them legal, just that attraction alone shouldn't be criminal.
Sharpshooter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rocag said:

Well don't these people, assuming they've committed no crimes, have the right to free speech and assembly?

Personally I don't think people pick who they're attracted to, so the idea that someone could naturally be attracted to people under the legal age seems plausible to me. Not that it would make any kind of sexual contact with them legal, just that attraction alone shouldn't be criminal.
In a word, NO. There are absolutes in life.
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Fatboy Thaddeus said:

Fast-tracking the MAP movement might just be the Trump team's October surprise. Stay tuned.



What the hell are you babbling about?
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Well don't these people, assuming they've committed no crimes, have the right to free speech and assembly?
sure they do.

but should we celebrate and encourage it? or should these people be chastised and made to understand they are sick people that need help?
Rocag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Interesting. So how do we decide which groups aren't entitled to free speech or freedom of assembly?
frenchtoast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rocag said:

Well don't these people, assuming they've committed no crimes, have the right to free speech and assembly?

Personally I don't think people pick who they're attracted to, so the idea that someone could naturally be attracted to people under the legal age seems plausible to me. Not that it would make any kind of sexual contact with them legal, just that attraction alone shouldn't be criminal.
Probably so, but if a mob showed up and beat the **** out of them, they'd be doing the world a favor.
Rocag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BMX Bandit said:

Quote:

Well don't these people, assuming they've committed no crimes, have the right to free speech and assembly?
sure they do.

but should we celebrate and encourage it? or should these people be chastised and made to understand they are sick people that need help?
I don't think that was what the clip in question showed. It seemed to me the City official was hoping to prevent any possible violence against the people attending the meeting, which is absolutely a legitimate goal.
Sharpshooter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rocag said:

Interesting. So how do we decide which groups aren't entitled to free speech or freedom of assembly?
If you can't differentiate between harming children and normal life, I pray for you.
Hubert J. Farnsworth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
None of us here have any sympathy or tolerance for pedophiles. You are picking the wrong hill to fight on.
CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rocag said:

Well don't these people, assuming they've committed no crimes, have the right to free speech and assembly?

Personally I don't think people pick who they're attracted to, so the idea that someone could naturally be attracted to people under the legal age seems plausible to me. Not that it would make any kind of sexual contact with them legal, just that attraction alone shouldn't be criminal.


And here we go.
hunter2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
you didn't answer the questions
Rocag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hubert J. Farnsworth said:

None of us here have any sympathy or tolerance for pedophiles. You are picking the wrong hill to fight on.
Well that's the thing about rights, isn't it? If they can just be stripped away from the people you have no sympathy or tolerance for, do they even exist in the first place?
GE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They should pass out pagers at the meeting to keep in touch…. We need to provide benefits to our marginalized groups.
Keller6Ag91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Eso si, Que es said:

BusterAg said:

I might be OK with labeling people as MAP in the same way we lable people with drug addictions, xtreme pyromaniacs, homicidal tendencies, or major schizophrenia problems. It is perfectly acceptable to diagnose people with a dangerous mental disease, help them seek treatment, and protect society from their choices.
I agree that there is a distinct difference of having an urge and acting on the urge. While I could never understand this urge, I also couldn't understand the urge to use meth.

I just don't see a gathering helping these people. Send in project veritas and lets see if they are discussing how to help each other to deal with their urges or if they are teaching each other how to act on these urges while avoiding detection.
What is the purpose of these groups? If the purpose is to make themselves feel "normal" and that they're thinking is "right", then we have a huge problem.

They are FOR SURE acting on it....through pornography which will ultimately lead to the real thing.
Gig'Em and God Bless,

JB'91
Old May Banker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They cannot be rehabilitated... take them out of the population.
stick95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
n/m
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I do I have some sympathy for those who have never acted upon the urges and do not want to. Many of them were probably abused themselves. It would be horrible to go through life with a desire to harm others, and have to constantly fight against yourself to not do it. At least they know it is wrong, but they should still be isolated from society until such time as a way is developed to fix their broken brains. If physical castration removes the urges, that's a completely acceptable solution, but it likely wouldn't for most.

As for anyone who has harmed a child, well hunter2012 already posted the correct punishment.

As for this meeting, as the OP noted, this is not a support group like AA where they're trying to prevent themselves from ever acting on the urges. This is them planning to try to legitimize their perversions and eventually push to legalize pedophilia and/or discussing how to avoid getting caught. It is a certainty that many if not all of them in attendance are already guilty of a crime.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Goaltending for pedos...
Aggies1322
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rocag said:

Well don't these people, assuming they've committed no crimes, have the right to free speech and assembly?

Personally I don't think people pick who they're attracted to, so the idea that someone could naturally be attracted to people under the legal age seems plausible to me. Not that it would make any kind of sexual contact with them legal, just that attraction alone shouldn't be criminal.

wtf
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.