bobbranco said:
Captain Pablo said:
bobbranco said:
Captain Pablo said:
K2Ag97 said:
Captain Pablo said:
IndividualFreedom said:
Quote:
You know what, you're right. I repent. I have seen the light.
I want to embrace the vision of my small government conservative brethren and give the federal government the ability to strip away the rights not just of people who have been convicted of some crime but who are deemed guilty of harboring thoughts the government has declared to be deviant.
Let's create a federal watch list, just like we do for people with terrorist connections. I'm sure this will work out just fine. And these people will have to accept living under constant surveillance, without the ability to speak freely or assemble. Maybe we can even take away their right to buy firearms, how about that! And it doesn't matter that they might not have technically committed any crime, this is for the children. We have to err on the side of caution. So, by default, it's going to be a lot easier to get on the list than get off. Oh well. For the children.
And, while we're already taking away rights of people for having deviant thoughts, perhaps we can expand this just a bit. We've got precedent after all. I can think of some political beliefs I just don't like the look of. Let's add them to the list as well.
Hallelujah! My eyes have been opened!
Good! sarcasm or not.... Babies/Kids/Children........... that is a no go zone. Line in the sand. Hypocrisy be damned. Go look review the thread regarding the officer that shot and killed the potential pedo judge in Kentucky. Supposedly diddled his daughter and got dead for doing it. If proven the judge did this, I hope the court gives the officer community service and a medal.
In the same post you said "potential pedo" and "supposedly diddled"
You don't even know if the judge is guilty but you condone and celebrate his murder?
He said "If proven the judge did this", and you responded with "You don't even know if the judge is guilty but you condone and celebrate his murder?"
It seems like you aren't being intellectually honest.
Have a great day!
Supposedly it was a deputy sheriff that molested a prisoner, the sheriff was deposed, and the sheriff and judge got into an argument at the courthouse, and the sheriff shot the judge. Motive has not been determined
Was the lawsuit the cause of the argument or was the argument about the rape of the sheriff's daughter?
We don't know. It's all speculation.
Who the hell knows. But what I've see nothing of is any evidence the judge raped the sheriffs daughter
Have you?
By all accounts it was a deputy that did it, and he pleaded guilty
The argument, if I had to guess, was over a lawsuit that was subsequently filed, but who knows
So why is f16 cheering on the murder of this judge?
The deputy raped the sheriff's daughter???
Apologies - to clarify - allegedly molested a prisoner
The claim was made in the other thread that the judge molested the sheriff's daughter and the sheriff killed the judge. F16 erupted into thunderous applause
Turns out there is nothing to support this
What actually happened is a deputy supposedly molested a prisoner. A lawsuit was filed, the sheriff was deposed, the sheriff and judge got into an argument, and the sheriff killed the judge