I don't agree with this, for a few reasons. First, the FBI are utterly clueless, and generally morons. They don't plan things, they react. Sure, they are brownshirts as to investigations to support the Democrats/communists, but they didn't plan this hit. Second, the handler clearly gave him the intelligence data to pull off these shots.VP at Pierce and Pierce said:His handler.Raiderjay said:Appears to be new footage of sniper Thomas Matthew Crooks at the Butler rally before shooting President Trump pic.twitter.com/srmgVv81qr
— Jack Poso ๐บ๐ธ (@JackPosobiec) August 19, 2024
Who is he following in the blue shirt/sunglasses with a big "lump" in his left hip?
I saw a theory that makes a lot of sense for a few reasons. His handler coaxed him into going to the rally with a gun and some bombs in hopes of him being caught. The FBI could do what they do best, say they prevented another atrocity thus justifying more money, by preventing a shooting a bombing. The handler thought there was no way he would have actually been able to get anywhere near the president much less get a shot.
It is either that or behind the scenes the powers put in a skeleton crew knowing there was going to be a shooter and the rest is history.
It wasn't just about money/bombs but a belief he could be famous for it. Classic CIA/intelligence operation. Third, the 'in the know' group also made sure to have (a) CNN live streaming it, and (b) a cell-phone-only equipped team of snipers on site, without a pre site planning map/survey, or comms to local police etc. And suppressed/refused aerial surveillance (drones) or overwatch of the buildings in question.
I 'love and trust' the FBI as much as anyone here but they are only involved in the cover up, not the actual assassination attempt, imho.