*****Official Conspiracy Theory Thread*****

83,910 Views | 763 Replies | Last: 2 mo ago by donkeykick90
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I was lectured about being crazy to suspect the FBI was political early on in russia gate, eventually later with the "Mueller is coming" hilarity, then when I blasted Fauci as a fraud early in 2020, and this one is easier than either of those, imho.

Anyway, on that photo I put up, you can find it all over X at least this am. I'm not sure it's actually him or not.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

I don't think anyone would suspect Joe Biden of directing/ordering the conspiracy. He's not running a single damn thing in his condition. It would come from the intelligence community, to be frank, the folks most motivated and most dangerous toward DJT returning to the presidency.

Comey, Strzok, Clapper etc. were not lone actors the first time, and they knew Hillary's "Russia dossier" courtesy of Steele was bs well before Trump took the oath. The CIA even has a book out available for free as to how/why they hate him.

Oh, he used encrypted communications, how shocking.



It's amazing some of this all manages to tie back to Hunter and Burisma etc:



From one of your X links above:
Quote:

So I have some serious questions regarding how a 12 channel transmitter, which appears unavailable in common markets, came to be ordered by some teenager.

Much ado about that Chinese model not being available on Amazon. I bet it is available on Temu or one of the other ChiCom Amazon-style sites.
Trump will fix it.
confucius_ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://vigilantnews.com/post/the-building-where-trump-shooter-sniped-from-was-sold-four-months-ago/
"Me not know, me not tell, me push button and run like hell."
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


And there it is.

Of all the conspiracy theories so far, this one would explain the motive, and would simultaneously be something the media and current administration would want to cover up.
Trump will fix it.
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Chufarri is not a fan of Cheattle.



Will be curious if Garland somehow shuts him down on this.
Dr. Mephisto
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sharpshooter said:

The roof was not protected because the roof was too steep (despite the fact the other sniper teams were on roofs more sloped.
This by itself is enough to can the Cheetos lady.
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
techno-ag said:



And there it is.

Of all the conspiracy theories so far, this one would explain the motive, and would simultaneously be something the media and current administration would want to cover up.



The encryption proves he was working with or for someone. They found a stooge to do it, who happened to be in a black rock commercial.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I wouldn't go that far on the encryption side. I run an encrypted VPN at home, and I am not working for the CIA. Wait, or am I? That's exactly what a fed would say.
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

I wouldn't go that far on the encryption side. I run an encrypted VPN at home, and I am not working for the CIA. Wait, or am I? That's exactly what a fed would say.



Ok, I might have jumped the gun. Home is fine. On a dangerous sloped roof to shoot at trump after being in a black rock commercial might deserve some extra scrutiny.
NPH-
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
as we are not specifically identifying which conspiracy theory in the title, were the moon landings fake or real? why haven't we gone back? where is the blast zone/crater? how did we get through the van allen radiation belt? did that tinfoil lander really make it down and back up off the moon? how was the orbiter able to catch the lander on the very first try (we can't even do that today)? have you seen the videos of astronauts on the moon appearing to be "lifted" up when they fall down? apparently the actual amount of fuel needed to get to moon & back is 10x what they supposedly used, how is this possible? why are none of the original videos, plans, technology, etc. that were used in the first missions still around today? what happened to them? have you seen the multiple light source theory regarding different shadow angles of photos on the moon? how, in today's technologically superior landscape, have we not sent a single person back to the moon since then? because it's technically impossible? how if they landed on the "face" of the moon, do we have pictures of the horizon of the moon with the earth just off the horizon? wouldn't it be directly above if they landed on the face? my phone can't sit 5 minutes in the heat of the sun without overheating, yet the cameras, radios and other technology of the late 60s made it all the way through with no issues in the extreme heat & cold of the moon's surface? in speaking about phones, my phone has more technology & computing power packed into a 6.1" device that the entirety of the space program's computing power, yet with just that much we were able to go there and back multiple times? again, why haven't we gone back if we have infinitely superior technology?
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I probably should note that this is not dispositive at all yet but a valid question. Apologies for not putting this one on this thread instead of the other this am, intent wasn't to get folks upset:



It's still plausible, and it would be nice if his folks came out and at least released a public statement, though I realize they must be concerned about their own liability in any ongoing 'investigation' where the FBI et al. Are clearly motivated to point the finger at Crooks and his family, vs. anyone in the gov't etc.
Tailgate88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
degreedy said:

as we are not specifically identifying which conspiracy theory in the title, were the moon landings fake or real? why haven't we gone back? where is the blast zone/crater? how did we get through the van allen radiation belt? did that tinfoil lander really make it down and back up off the moon? how was the orbiter able to catch the lander on the very first try (we can't even do that today)? have you seen the videos of astronauts on the moon appearing to be "lifted" up when they fall down? apparently the actual amount of fuel needed to get to moon & back is 10x what they supposedly used, how is this possible? why are none of the original videos, plans, technology, etc. that were used in the first missions still around today? what happened to them? have you seen the multiple light source theory regarding different shadow angles of photos on the moon? how, in today's technologically superior landscape, have we not sent a single person back to the moon since then? because it's technically impossible? how if they landed on the "face" of the moon, do we have pictures of the horizon of the moon with the earth just off the horizon? wouldn't it be directly above if they landed on the face? my phone can't sit 5 minutes in the heat of the sun without overheating, yet the cameras, radios and other technology of the late 60s made it all the way through with no issues in the extreme heat & cold of the moon's surface? in speaking about phones, my phone has more technology & computing power packed into a 6.1" device that the entirety of the space program's computing power, yet with just that much we were able to go there and back multiple times? again, why haven't we gone back if we have infinitely superior technology?

Kunkle for Congress TX-34
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97 said:

I probably should note that this is not dispositive at all yet but a valid question. Apologies for not putting this one on this thread instead of the other this am, intent wasn't to get folks upset:



It's still plausible, and it would be nice if his folks came out and at least released a public statement, though I realize they must be concerned about their own liability in any ongoing 'investigation' where the FBI et al. Are clearly motivated to point the finger at Crooks and his family, vs. anyone in the gov't etc.
Do we not have confirmation on if this is him?
"Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself."
William Foster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
techno-ag said:



And there it is.

Of all the conspiracy theories so far, this one would explain the motive, and would simultaneously be something the media and current administration would want to cover up.
Whether that is him or not, I never understood why transies think Trump hates them so much.

B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
B-1 83 said:

What good is a conspiracy thread without conspirators?

Let's get a running tally of conspirators, useful idiots who worked together unknowingly but perfectly, or knew about the assassination plot that almost worked….


- shooter - he ain't talking
- Biden (not likely) or someone within his campaign (Jill?) would have to give the "OK"
- The SS head
- the SS team leader on the ground
- snipers who didn't shoot
- snipers who didn't show up
- SS team members in the nearby building that did nothing
- SS team members who failed to get Trump out of the way knowing there was a shooter
- SS security who let him in with a rangefinder
- the building owner
- Soros fund managers
- BlackRock managers
- the other 2 shooters in the tree's and on the water tower
- security that helped the guys in the trees and water tower

All these have appeared here as part of the plan. Feel free to add or delete if debunked
.
Forgot to add the photographer who happened to use the correct lens and speed to capture the bullet shot

No real guesses? Since this morning, we've "learned" the SS in the building the shooter was capped on took the shots. LOTS of more people to clam up.

Edit: We have the guys who didn't properly tag the "transmitter" before taking the picture.
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
MagnumLoad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FireAg said:

I believe there was an element within our government that needed a Hail Mary to keep him from winning…

This was it…

20yo kid never fired a shot…

I simply can't believe with any ounce of common sense that some 20yo kid walking around with a ladder, rifle, and range finder, for at least 30 min, out the open, and seen by everyone, is able to calmly climb up into a perfect sniper's roost, and which was on top of the LEO Command Post, mind you, and clip Donald Trump's ear with an AR15 using iron sights…

We have no detailed intel on the weapon, no shot count from the "shooter" vs counter sniper teams, no shell casings discussed as being found on the roof with the 20yo…nothing…

Shooter was behind the kid, much further away, and Trump's head tilt alone saved him…


Travel time of a 5.56 round from 400 feet is 0.13 seconds. Travel time from farther increases more than linearly because of speed decrease with distance. 0.13 seconds is enough time to rotate or tilt head 30 degrees to the left, which made the difference between the round going into the right eye or clipping the top of the right ear.
Dirt 05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think this is a symptom of having an incompetent president and executive branch of government that is enabled by a congress that does not hold them accountable.

Mayorkas is the head of DHS which Secret Service falls under. Mayorkas has been an complete failure for the United States of America, allowing and transporting in millions of illegal immigrants. Congress failed to impeach that sorry POS for failing Americans. That Cheatle is still the head of Secret Service today tells you there is no accountability in DHS. That none of the agents on site decided to do their job of protecting the former president and current presidential candidate until after shooting started, probably has something to do with incompetent Cheatle training them as head of the SS training center in her last role.

State Department - Anthony Blinken - Iran is actively putting together a nuclear weapon, fired massive missile barrage at Israel and has choked the Red Sea through Houthi proxies. US response - fund Israel to fight Hamas, and supply Gaza to resist Israel. Perma War in Ukraine greenlighted by incompetence of this department in 2021-2022 pre invasion.

Treasury - Janet Yellen - If you haven't dealt with the IRS, it's probably because you are still waiting on hold. Debt will probably be $35 trillion before I finish typing this post.

Defense - Lloyd Austin AKA "The Black Man" by POTUS- Afghanistan withdrawal debacle, a Navy that can't build ships, the Army after watching the Ukraine war for two years decides it's time to replace its rifle with a different caliber because drones - who needs those?

Interior-Deb Haaland- Is focused on climate change and DEI instead of managing federal lands.

Agriculture-Tom Vilsack-Why do we even call it the department of agriculture when 70% of its budget is for food stamps and school lunches? Past four years have seen huge amounts of productive arable land converted to low reliability heavy metal leaching solar panels.

Justice-Merrick Garland-Can't even use incompetent FBI agents to plant sufficient evidence to imprison Donald Trump, which seems to be their singular focus. The ATF still exists to infringe on 2nd, 4th, 10th, and 21st amendments.

Veteran Affairs-Denis McDonough-Just talk to a veteran, it's shameful how the government treats them.

HHS-Xavier Becerra-$1.8 T budget. My experience in hospital finance tells me you could reduce this budget by 30% with the only effort required - refusing to pay blatant fraud.

HUD-Marcia Fudge-$62B budget - I guess they are using this to set up tent shanty towns in every major city?

Transportation-Pete Buttigieg-$145B amazing bang for the buck for citizens of Washington D.C. Also, look how great the FAA is doing with the 737-Max.

Education-Miguel Cardona-$80B - the more the Feds spend, the dumber our kids get.

Energy-Jennifer Granholm-$46B - Are we getting more nuclear baseload? NO! Intermittent wind & solar.

Labor-Julie Su-Apparently it takes $98B and 15,000 employees to come up with the B.S. inflation numbers.

Commerce-Gina Raimondo-$16B budget and 41,000 employees. For some reason NOAA is under this branch, I'm actually not going to gripe about them.

Even the shooter was incompetent. There is no reason for a 20 yo male in America to miss a target with an AR15 from that distance.

Let's face it, there isn't a function under the executive branch that isn't negligently incompetent at this point unless your viewpoint is from someone suckling at the teat of a government contract.

TLDR - We'd be better off having a Girl Scout troop who have completed their leadership and budgeting badges run every federal branch of government.

techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Latest: FBI power washed the roof to eliminate evidence.

Trump will fix it.
J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
techno-ag said:

Latest: FBI power washed the roof to eliminate evidence.




When was that photo taken?
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We gotta stay on track here I realize but the context of the suspicion about Crooks should be documented:







This will inevitably be an ongoing discussion with little more public information by the time JFK's assassination anniversary rolls around in a few months.
ABATTBQ87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
techno-ag said:

Latest: FBI power washed the roof to eliminate evidence.


How is that guy able to stand on the roof without sliding off?
SeMgCo87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
techno-ag said:

Latest: FBI power washed the roof to eliminate evidence.


Lessee...power wash blood stains...whose blood? Crooks'? Yearick's?

Yearick's more likely...blood evidence of Yearick would contradict Crooks as the shooter...

"You are being watched..."
J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The hosing thing is one of the more hilarious "omg look at this completely innocuous activity, let's blow it up as if it's a part of a giant conspiracy" examples from this week so far. Do people really believe "they" are smart enough to pull off a giant multilevel conspiracy but also dumb enough to get caught hosing down important evidence of that conspiracy in broad daylight? Crime scenes get processed and then cleaned up. Not like 3 day old brains from the shooter would be of much value.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Who is Yearick? Have seen the name but not the context. TIA.
SeMgCo87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
J. Walter Weatherman said:

The hosing thing is one of the more hilarious "omg look at this completely innocuous activity, let's blow it up as if it's a part of a giant conspiracy" examples from this week so far. Do people really believe "they" are smart enough to pull off a giant multilevel conspiracy but also dumb enough to get caught hosing down important evidence of that conspiracy in broad daylight? Crime scenes get processed and then cleaned up. Not like 3 day old brains from the shooter would be of much value.
You are correct, if we can date that photo to days after the efent...it has been so easy on SM to include a photo or video that is really weeks, months or even years...again, when was it taken? I'm just tying it to a photo of someone laying up there with their head blown open...the head shape of that corpse is closer to Yearick, in my opinion...I'll see if I can pull up that pic...

"You are being watched..."
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't. I think it was SOP.

It's a funny optic though after the SS director cited the danger of the roof slant.

And Yearick is an alternate theory as to who did it that also doesn't make much sense, imho. Crooks was up there...until he stopped respirating.

Crooks social media included apparently a search history into major depression.



His mental state is relevant no matter how one feels about the probability as to CIA/intelligence community involvement with his actions. It may have been on the other thread but rumor he apparently had a burner phone as well with 27 contacts.

Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Madman said:

NicosMachine said:

Illustrate conspiracy theory:


That so reminds me of the tsip artist that always drew Aggie stick figures wearing overalls and carrying a hoe. And the Sooners always had a bag of, well, things.

So in that spirit somebody needs to add the bag next to the USSS.

Thujone.
IndividualFreedom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

1. The real shooter was in a tree and Crooks never shot, he was just there for the USSS to shoot.
Posting this question again:

Where are the shell casings from the shooter's rifle? How many casings were on the roof?
Monkeypoxfighter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DamnGood86 said:

B-1 83 said:

What good is a conspiracy thread without conspirators?

Let's get a running tally of conspirators, useful idiots who worked together unknowingly but perfectly, or knew about the assassination plot that almost worked….


- shooter - he ain't talking
- Biden (not likely) or someone within his campaign (Jill?) would have to give the "OK"
- The SS head
- the SS team leader on the ground
- snipers who didn't shoot
- snipers who didn't show up
- SS team members in the nearby building that did nothing
- SS team members who failed to get Trump out of the way knowing there was a shooter
- SS security who let him in with a rangefinder
- the building owner
- Soros fund managers
- BlackRock managers
- the other 2 shooters in the tree's and on the water tower
- security that helped the guys in the trees and water tower

All these have appeared here as part of the plan. Feel free to add or delete if debunked

One persuasive person on advance team to convince group to exclude said building building from SS/federal primary perimeter. Same person, or another, to continue to downplay significance of that rooftop (too sloped, too hot, whatever). Same person could influence comms, or not.

That's it. One key person and the rest just say OK, even though they may likely disagree. The rest is just typical fumbling/bumbling of putting disjointed personnel together for one day. Nobody really knows what to do or who to talk to.
Some of the theories discussed at length here would sure need more folks than that, or be seriously dependent on lots of loose parts to fall into place. The longer the thread gets and the more theories come out, especially with multiple shooters (including Secret Service doing the shooting at Trump), the more and more people it would seem would have to know. I'm almost leaning towards the little turd maybe wanting some sort of mass killing affair, especially with the explosives found. That's not what I expect a deep state plot to evolve into.
It only took me a year to figure out this place is nuts!
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
IndividualFreedom said:

Quote:

1. The real shooter was in a tree and Crooks never shot, he was just there for the USSS to shoot.
Posting this question again:

Where are the shell casings from the shooter's rifle? How many casings were on the roof?

So much video of this 20 yo kid getting into position, people shouting, yadda yadda…

Still no video of him squeezing off a single round…
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A ton of people don't need to be in the loop…just the right number of people with the right motivations to keep it under wraps…

Secrets aren't hard to keep if you have the right people keeping them, or the people who can't be trusted with them stop breathing…

These things don't have to be like planning a 2 week trip to Disney with three generations of extended family…

Just a few people need to know, and then surround them with people who follow orders…
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Correct. It doesn't take many.

Wait, a new excuse/explanation/claim?



I'm sure NATO's leadership ain't real excited about Trump's second term, of course.
SeMgCo87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Who is Yearick? Have seen the name but not the context. TIA.
Rooftop shot...

Note blood runs...

"You are being watched..."
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Each American has to accept one of two scenarios:

1. USSS is extremely incompetent and let a sniper known to many on the ground (both LEO and casual bystanders taking videos and phoning things into 911) take 30 minutes, in full view, to climb into an obvious and excellent sniper's nest on a flat roof, under the eyes and scope of USSS counter sniper teams, and squeeze off multiple shots on the former POTUS, including one round that connected, before a counter sniper ended the threat…

Or…

2. This was a set up by shadow forces within our own government out to silence a political threat that they have been unable to silence with fake crimes, fake convictions, impeachments, and the threat of prison time…. Biden's goose was cooked, they know Harris is the next, most plausible option, and she's a loser too against Trump, so their last hope to eliminate Trump…

One of those options gets people fired…the other options sends people in front of firing squads…

Which narrative makes the most sense to push if a couple of the agencies who have been trying to rid the ballot of Trump through "legal" (tongue-in-cheek) means are now the entities "investigating" the attempted assassination? This isn't hard to figure out…
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.