Or AGENT FUPAcheeky said:Probably more accurately referred to as "Pat"BadMoonRisin said:
so now we are arguing over fat secret service barbie?
Or AGENT FUPAcheeky said:Probably more accurately referred to as "Pat"BadMoonRisin said:
so now we are arguing over fat secret service barbie?
Quote:
Of note I saw a pic today of the shooters backpack next to his bike
OldArmy71 said:Quote:
Of note I saw a pic today of the shooters backpack next to his bike
I have read every word of this thread as well as other sources (NYT especially) and I recall that the bike was not his. Also, he drove himself to the site. And finally, the backpack was with him up on the roof. (I guess he could have had two backpacks, one with the rifle, one with the rangefinder, etc.)
Is any of that incorrect?
OldArmy71 said:Quote:
Of note I saw a pic today of the shooters backpack next to his bike
I have read every word of this thread as well as other sources (NYT especially) and I recall that the bike was not his. Also, he drove himself to the site. And finally, the backpack was with him up on the roof. (I guess he could have had two backpacks, one with the rifle, one with the rangefinder, etc.)
Is any of that incorrect?
Pretty simple to do a touch DNA test on the bike to determine that. FBI does that all of the time.MarkTwain said:OldArmy71 said:Quote:
Of note I saw a pic today of the shooters backpack next to his bike
I have read every word of this thread as well as other sources (NYT especially) and I recall that the bike was not his. Also, he drove himself to the site. And finally, the backpack was with him up on the roof. (I guess he could have had two backpacks, one with the rifle, one with the rangefinder, etc.)
Is any of that incorrect?
The BCSO After Action Report tagged it as his and the FBI indicated that they thought it was his, so I'm leaning to a "No" to your question
aggiehawg said:Pretty simple to do a touch DNA test on the bike to determine that. FBI does that all of the time.MarkTwain said:OldArmy71 said:Quote:
Of note I saw a pic today of the shooters backpack next to his bike
I have read every word of this thread as well as other sources (NYT especially) and I recall that the bike was not his. Also, he drove himself to the site. And finally, the backpack was with him up on the roof. (I guess he could have had two backpacks, one with the rifle, one with the rangefinder, etc.)
Is any of that incorrect?
The BCSO After Action Report tagged it as his and the FBI indicated that they thought it was his, so I'm leaning to a "No" to your question
BoerneGator said:
Given that video exists of him walking up to the AGR complex (ostensibly from his car) it's doubtful the bike is his. Just another distraction.
How much did we know about the Boston bombers 3 weeks after the event? Crooks? He had some encrypted messages. Crack investigative work there.txags92 said:aggiehawg said:Pretty simple to do a touch DNA test on the bike to determine that. FBI does that all of the time.MarkTwain said:OldArmy71 said:Quote:
Of note I saw a pic today of the shooters backpack next to his bike
I have read every word of this thread as well as other sources (NYT especially) and I recall that the bike was not his. Also, he drove himself to the site. And finally, the backpack was with him up on the roof. (I guess he could have had two backpacks, one with the rifle, one with the rangefinder, etc.)
Is any of that incorrect?
The BCSO After Action Report tagged it as his and the FBI indicated that they thought it was his, so I'm leaning to a "No" to your question
Even easier to just ask his parents.
I never said they would tell us what the parents said. But it is an easiest and quicker way to find out than running DNA from a bike.Tony Franklins Other Shoe said:How much did we know about the Boston bombers 3 weeks after the event? Crooks? He had some encrypted messages. Crack investigative work there.txags92 said:aggiehawg said:Pretty simple to do a touch DNA test on the bike to determine that. FBI does that all of the time.MarkTwain said:OldArmy71 said:Quote:
Of note I saw a pic today of the shooters backpack next to his bike
I have read every word of this thread as well as other sources (NYT especially) and I recall that the bike was not his. Also, he drove himself to the site. And finally, the backpack was with him up on the roof. (I guess he could have had two backpacks, one with the rifle, one with the rangefinder, etc.)
Is any of that incorrect?
The BCSO After Action Report tagged it as his and the FBI indicated that they thought it was his, so I'm leaning to a "No" to your question
Even easier to just ask his parents.
Sorry, didn't mean to call out your response, I agree. It's just that a dead killer should have a lot more information out there about him by now. I can see why they are slow playing the investigation to the biggest **** up in SS history, but Crooks background should be laid open by now.txags92 said:I never said they would tell us what the parents said. But it is an easiest and quicker way to find out than running DNA from a bike.Tony Franklins Other Shoe said:How much did we know about the Boston bombers 3 weeks after the event? Crooks? He had some encrypted messages. Crack investigative work there.txags92 said:aggiehawg said:Pretty simple to do a touch DNA test on the bike to determine that. FBI does that all of the time.MarkTwain said:OldArmy71 said:Quote:
Of note I saw a pic today of the shooters backpack next to his bike
I have read every word of this thread as well as other sources (NYT especially) and I recall that the bike was not his. Also, he drove himself to the site. And finally, the backpack was with him up on the roof. (I guess he could have had two backpacks, one with the rifle, one with the rangefinder, etc.)
Is any of that incorrect?
The BCSO After Action Report tagged it as his and the FBI indicated that they thought it was his, so I'm leaning to a "No" to your question
Even easier to just ask his parents.
I am not hinting at a conspiracy in the shooting by saying this, but I am very confused by the lack of curiosity on the part of the MSM about his parents and his upbringing. I know given the biases in the MSM they want the story to go away, but not seeing anybody even trying to reach out and talk to them or research their backgrounds seems out of character for the media. That probably tells you everything you need to know about the shooter's politics. If they were rabid MAGA types, their entire lives would be up for discussion nightly.Tony Franklins Other Shoe said:Sorry, didn't mean to call out your response, I agree. It's just that a dead killer should have a lot more information out there about him by now. I can see why they are slow playing the investigation to the biggest **** up in SS history, but Crooks background should be laid open by now.txags92 said:I never said they would tell us what the parents said. But it is an easiest and quicker way to find out than running DNA from a bike.Tony Franklins Other Shoe said:How much did we know about the Boston bombers 3 weeks after the event? Crooks? He had some encrypted messages. Crack investigative work there.txags92 said:aggiehawg said:Pretty simple to do a touch DNA test on the bike to determine that. FBI does that all of the time.MarkTwain said:OldArmy71 said:Quote:
Of note I saw a pic today of the shooters backpack next to his bike
I have read every word of this thread as well as other sources (NYT especially) and I recall that the bike was not his. Also, he drove himself to the site. And finally, the backpack was with him up on the roof. (I guess he could have had two backpacks, one with the rifle, one with the rangefinder, etc.)
Is any of that incorrect?
The BCSO After Action Report tagged it as his and the FBI indicated that they thought it was his, so I'm leaning to a "No" to your question
Even easier to just ask his parents.
TexasRebel said:
wtf am I looking at?
Hercules Team 2 was on the barn roof partially obscured by the tree line, relative to Crooks rooftop position?MarkTwain said:TexasRebel said:
wtf am I looking at?
What is Hercules 2 USSS CST with a couple of MRAD .300 Win Mags on tripods Alex?
aggiehawg said:Hercules Team 2 was on the barn roof partially obscured by the tree line, relative to Crooks rooftop position?MarkTwain said:TexasRebel said:
wtf am I looking at?
What is Hercules 2 USSS CST with a couple of MRAD .300 Win Mags on tripods Alex?
I am an Ol' Dame. Cardinal directions are not my bailiwick absent a sunrise or a sunset.MarkTwain said:aggiehawg said:Hercules Team 2 was on the barn roof partially obscured by the tree line, relative to Crooks rooftop position?MarkTwain said:TexasRebel said:
wtf am I looking at?
What is Hercules 2 USSS CST with a couple of MRAD .300 Win Mags on tripods Alex?
Okay I thought team 1 was to the north and team 2 was to the south
BREAKING: @HawleyMO says @SecretService whistleblowers tell him that the lead agent on the Trump Butler job was NOT enforcing the normal security protocols that day and she wasn’t having ID’s checked that day. He describes it as a free-for-all and says as we speak, this lead… pic.twitter.com/g0bR55KPas
— Jesse Watters (@JesseBWatters) August 6, 2024
Anyone know where to go to watch the full documentary?Texas velvet maestro said:
TMZ putting out a free doc. Hopefully that will help keep the fed's failure in mind.
flakrat said:Anyone know where to go to watch the full documentary?Texas velvet maestro said:
TMZ putting out a free doc. Hopefully that will help keep the fed's failure in mind.