Shots fired at Trump [Keep it factual -- Staff]

847,190 Views | 6497 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by gigemags-99
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Did the bullet that killed Crooks penetrate into the metal roof, and are there any more bullet holes in the roof?

Facilities should send somebody up to check that out with a can of flex-seal. They already got a big PR problem. Don't need water damaged equipment on top of that.
Texas velvet maestro
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Guitarsoup said:


The building was connected to the building Crooks was on. Windows didn't open, police inside looking out those windows.

Green is 2nd story area.

Red is where Crooks was


that's the side angle of buildings.
So police were standing above and behind Crooks, looking toward Trump/podium, out windows we know can't be opened? Ok.
I hadn't heard that. I guess that's why the police didn't put one in the lone shooters butthole. the window glass.
agracer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So either typical government incompetence or willful disregard for Trumps security bc they don't care if something bad happens. Probably a lot of both.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think it's difficult to conclude anything based on permanently closed windows in the adjacent structure. Typically, especially in a warehouse style steel metal building used for manufacturing, if those windows are sealed, I think it's unlikely there is even an office at that level. Fire codes usually require two ways out from an upstairs fire and there are codes around windows etc. for that.

They may have just been there for (interior) light, is my point. I think it's improbable cops were watching Crooks from those windows and just muttering 'shucks, wish we could open this window to take action.'
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Texas velvet maestro said:

Guitarsoup said:


The building was connected to the building Crooks was on. Windows didn't open, police inside looking out those windows.

Green is 2nd story area.

Red is where Crooks was


that's the side angle of buildings.
So police were standing above and behind Crooks, looking toward Trump/podium, out windows we know can't be opened? Ok.
I hadn't heard that. I guess that's why the police didn't put one in the lone shooters butthole. the window glass.



He wasn't in front of their windows.
TexasAggie_02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Texas velvet maestro said:

I don't care what the FBI says was on Crooks phone, or his former classmates, or a lady w mole
There was a window behind Crooks, and you don't have to set up on a the sill to shoot out of a window.
you could be on a tripod 6 feet back into the room.


shooter was on the right end of that building, not the left. Therefore, the windows were not directly behind him. the shooting angle in this diagram is completely wrong.
Texas velvet maestro
How long do you want to ignore this user?
yeah, it's difficult to conclude. we'll never know anything for sure except there was a kid on the roof with a gun and now he's dead. so, back to the kid's phone, and his possible connection w iran.
EDHEC Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guitarsoup said:

Texas velvet maestro said:

Was there a 2 story building with a window behind crooks? with a sight line to the podium? Is this true?


The building was connected to the building Crooks was on. Windows didn't open, police inside looking out those windows.

Green is 2nd story area.

Red is where Crooks was




Is that a roof access door, below the green x, from the 2nd floor of that building where the LE are supposed to be? If it is and they're there and hear reports of someone on that roof they could have gone out that and easily seen the shooter.
MRB10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I haven't read the whole thread but have we talked about the water tower yet?



Seems compelling if true but I have no idea if it's legit. If it's true, you have an assistant FBI director sitting behind Trump, not looking phased, who whips out her phone to film. A van registered to the Dept of Agriculture and a guy zip lining off a water tower with a good vantage point.

I figure those interested in figuring this out might want to go down the rabbit hole.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ripped from Hollywood script, we looking at a 'reverse Under Siege' scenario here.

Instead of former seal Steven Segal working as a cook and coming in to save the day, the Iranians somehow compromised a 20-year old cook from the local nursing home and had him shoot at Trump as a patsy.

That said, godspeed to Ericka Eleniak. VHS tape worn out at that spot.
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pepper Brooks said:

I haven't read the whole thread but have we talked about the water tower yet?



Seems compelling if true but I have no idea if it's legit. If it's true, you have an assistant FBI director sitting behind Trump, not looking phased, who whips out her phone to film. A van registered to the Dept of Agriculture and a guy zip lining off a water tower with a good vantage point.

I figure those interested in figuring this out might want to go down the rabbit hole.
A zipline from the water tower to the ground? That would be impressive. Did he stop and gather it up (lots of time involved) or leave it?
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
Definitely Not A Cop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pepper Brooks said:

I haven't read the whole thread but have we talked about the water tower yet?



Seems compelling if true but I have no idea if it's legit. If it's true, you have an assistant FBI director sitting behind Trump, not looking phased, who whips out her phone to film. A van registered to the Dept of Agriculture and a guy zip lining off a water tower with a good vantage point.

I figure those interested in figuring this out might want to go down the rabbit hole.



There is zero chance that there wouldn't be video of the zip line in the air in some of the footage already posted, right?
Madman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ziplines?

Why not a jetpack?
AnScAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I realize that the SS detail did its job after the shot(s) were fired, that the DHS/etc sent some under/unqualified people to act in the place of SS, and that a lot of the security was pushed off on local and state personnel that led to the fiasco we all saw on Saturday.

What I don't understand is with this obvious lack of security, why in the hell did the SS on the ground not put their foot down and either stop the event from going forward (I can imagine Trump would have thrown a **** fit), demanded a greater armed presence before continuing or call SS HQ and get them to send more agents before the speakers began. This situation is basically the same as the Rangers/Astros showing up for a weekend series and only the infielders flight got there in time so they hit up the local colleges, HS teams, travel ball clubs and rec leagues to fill out the rest of the roster for the game. It is doubtful Trump would have let them cancel the event, but if a half dozen or more kitted out commandos can rush the stage shortly after Trump and the others were hit, it seems logical that a few squads of active or reserve duty military guys could could have been set up at the fences and that in and around the unsecured buildings.

IMO this is more than just a security/intelligence failure it was willful disregard for the safety of Trump.
Texas velvet maestro
How long do you want to ignore this user?
... seen too much mission impossible. we know mixed up kids kill people sometimes. just one of those things.
StandUpforAmerica
How long do you want to ignore this user?
VP at Pierce and Pierce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So the water tower shooter missed? Then either got smoked by a different sniper and his body was not publicly recovered or he jumped down on a line of some sort and escape? The Crooks kid was just a decoy I guess. If we could find out if two snipers shot and where did they shoot as well as if Crooks actually got a round off.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pepper Brooks said:

I haven't read the whole thread but have we talked about the water tower yet?


Seems compelling if true but I have no idea if it's legit. If it's true, you have an assistant FBI director sitting behind Trump, not looking phased, who whips out her phone to film. A van registered to the Dept of Agriculture and a guy zip lining off a water tower with a good vantage point.

I figure those interested in figuring this out might want to go down the rabbit hole.

The zip line is stupid. Add in the Dept of Ag van and its special needs.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There is no possible way that water tower was left unsecured.

If the water tower was in fact left unsecured then it simply confirms what we already know.
AgGrad99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pepper Brooks said:

Seems compelling if true but I have no idea if it's legit. If it's true, you have an assistant FBI director sitting behind Trump, not looking phased, who whips out her phone to film. A van registered to the Dept of Agriculture and a guy zip lining off a water tower with a good vantage point.

I figure those interested in figuring this out might want to go down the rabbit hole.
There is no way someone zip lines down that tower without being seen. Where did the zipline/hardware go? That would be a lot of stuff to gather up and carry...and there would be attachment hardware left behind.

And that was not the Asst. FBI director behind Trump. That's been disproven.
William Foster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
VP at Pierce and Pierce said:

So the water tower shooter missed? Then either got smoked by a different sniper and his body was not publicly recovered or he jumped down on a line of some sort and escape? The Crooks kid was just a decoy I guess. If we could find out if two snipers shot and where did they shoot as well as if Crooks actually got a round off.
The perfectly placed head shot did not "miss". Trump just turned his head at the perfect time. It would have gone straight through the brain if not for that.

That being said, the water tower/zip line thing, being presented as fact up above, seems almost impossible.
Cepe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agracer said:

So either typical government incompetence or willful disregard for Trumps security bc they don't care if something bad happens. Probably a lot of both.
This is where I am on the whole thing.

I think Biden's cronies were F'ing with Trump and giving him minimal protection and the bottom of the rung trained people. They probably thought it would be funny (and probably advantageous) if someone took a pot-shot at him and maybe even eliminated their problem.

Guess what - it happened because they allowed it to happen.

The fact that no one has been fired, much less put on leave, during the investigation just goes to show those in charge have no issue with what went down. In fact, they've shifted into cover-up mode.

Nobody in this administration is held accountable for anything so why should this be any different.

These second shooter and other things are just nonsense IMO.
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgGrad99 said:

Pepper Brooks said:

Seems compelling if true but I have no idea if it's legit. If it's true, you have an assistant FBI director sitting behind Trump, not looking phased, who whips out her phone to film. A van registered to the Dept of Agriculture and a guy zip lining off a water tower with a good vantage point.

I figure those interested in figuring this out might want to go down the rabbit hole.
There is no way someone zip lines down that tower without being seen. Where did the zipline/hardware go? That would be a lot of stuff to gather up and carry...and there would be attachment hardware left behind.

And that was not the Asst. FBI director behind Trump. That's been disproven.
He used his wristwatch laser to cut the zipline, and then shot a bow-tie smoke bomb in the grass to cover his escape.
AgGrad99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That would have been hard to do from under his invisibility cloak.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stat Monitor Repairman said:

Stat Monitor Repairman said:


Quote:

Director Cheatle welcomes the opportunity to testify before the committee.
Ok then, it's settled. She accepted the subpoena and will testify on July 22.

Take solace in the fact that all of our questions will be answered in due course.

We've got the upmost confidence in this lady to reign all this back in and restore the public's faith in the democratic process.
One thing you'll notice about this Cheatle is that she tried to delay her congressional testimony saying in a letter that the July 22 date clashed with 'her travel and operational commitments."

What on earth could be more important than updating the American public as to why the former president and leading presidential candidate was shot on live tv?

What is more important than that?

Get all the big stuff out of the way at the hearing first, but somebody should ask that question.

What was on your schedule that would prevent you from testifying before the people's elected representatives?

What was it?
In light of recent developments,

Does Kim testify on Monday the 22nd?

Does this even go down as scheduled?

Y / N

What say you?
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Freaking Department of Agriculture van?????? I knew it!
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
TheCougarHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
William Foster said:

TxAg82 said:

I'm hearing rumors that the FBI lady had the moles added the day before to make sure she wasn't recognized when she was filming with her phone.
FBI lady DOES appear to have a similar left cheek mole that is covered by makeup if you zoom in tbh...but I agree it is not her. The lady in the crowd, while engaging in a very unusually calm and calculated response given the circumstances, is a COUG.

Even if she had devoted herself to getting in shape and getting an extreme makeover, no way she could make herself that attractive.


Go on….
VP at Pierce and Pierce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
William Foster said:

VP at Pierce and Pierce said:

So the water tower shooter missed? Then either got smoked by a different sniper and his body was not publicly recovered or he jumped down on a line of some sort and escape? The Crooks kid was just a decoy I guess. If we could find out if two snipers shot and where did they shoot as well as if Crooks actually got a round off.
The perfectly placed head shot did not "miss". Trump just turned his head at the perfect time. It would have gone straight through the brain if not for that.

That being said, the water tower/zip line thing, being presented as fact up above, seems almost impossible.
You are correct, the shot did not miss. Playing devil's advocate here, the shooter on the tower could have slide down a rope ala Ocean's Eleven and escaped on foot. Regarding someone finding the rope, I highly doubt they would encourage reporting the rope, who would even report finding it?. That would lead to more questions and more incompetence following the revelation that they all let some 20 year old wander around.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
She ain't testifying on the 22nd. She has a beach day planned.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sending random augmentees from DHS and particularly the DEA as fill-ins certainly raises some questions.

Why?

Because DEA is under the DOJ along with the FBI. USSS is under the umbrella of DHS.

So you sending people in to help out with Trump's security that ain't even in the same umbrella agency as the USSS.

Put this on the big board for Monday's episode of 'Questions with Kim'
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Augmenting Trump's security with random DHS and DEA people makes about as much sense as starting walk-ons in the college football playoff game.
MRB10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Didn't know it had been debunked. I haven't been paying that close of attention.
DTP02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pepper Brooks said:

I haven't read the whole thread but have we talked about the water tower yet?



Seems compelling if true but I have no idea if it's legit. If it's true, you have an assistant FBI director sitting behind Trump, not looking phased, who whips out her phone to film. A van registered to the Dept of Agriculture and a guy zip lining off a water tower with a good vantage point.

I figure those interested in figuring this out might want to go down the rabbit hole.


I heard if you blow up that pic of the water tower to full screen size on a big enough screen you can see the words gullible painted around the top .
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Personally I think a lot of these new crazy theories are purposefully being put out there so they can be easily discredited and paint anyone who questions anything as just a conspiracy nut.

The MAJOR item that needs to be addressed is why Trump was allowed up on the stage when they knew a suspicious person was unaccounted for and potentially seen on top of the roof with a rifle.

That needs to be the focus right now, who was responsible for allowing Trump on that stage and heads should roll from there.

Stop getting lost in the weeds of different theories that likely will never be proven. Focus on who put a former POTUS in jeopardy and fire them.
TxAg82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You can't prove that Dept. of Ag guy DIDN'T zipline down that tower into the getaway van driven by FBI director cougar. So it's still plausible.

Try and keep up.
First Page Last Page
Page 133 of 186
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.