jamey said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Hopefully he took my advice. He was pretty clearly not seeking legitimate discussion.

---

I was looking for legitimate discussion and got one legitimate answer from the person who blames the uniparty. That's logical but others blaming the Ds, while the Rs can't do anything about it but whine, not so much.

Another person saying the Ds look to win while Rs look to do their jobs may have a point but would need a better explanation

---

You're not looking for anything. You made a statement based on a premise that you believe to be true and refuse to accept any evidence or explanation to the contrary. Your logical fallacy is called begging the question.

Lol what a clown thread, OP.

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

The Lisa Page and Peter Strzok texts are proof that there was a conspiracy. The fact that no one has been prosecuted is proof there still is one and that it's big.

---

Who is going to prosecute the Russian hoax and/or laptop election interference by the intelligence community? The DOJ?

They've shown they are more than willing to go after one side in the early hours of the morning after calling CNN to get it on the 8AM news while outright ignoring fraud from the other side.

When a vast group of one column of government is that corrupt and the "fourth column" is in on it (or at least aligned with it), justice gets thrown to the side and curbed stomped.

"A vast right-wing conspiracy..."

Always projection.

here is why stupid people believe in conspiracy theories, and why intelligent people tend to believe in any conspiracy which makes the "other" side look bad

Why do smart people believe dumb things—like JFK’s assassination being the result of a vast, nefarious conspiracy?@SAPinker: “In general, smart people tend to be more resistant to cognitive illusions, fallacies, and biases. One exception being the myside bias…

The question… pic.twitter.com/qBuEuG5fcE

— Honestly with Bari Weiss (@thehonestlypod) June 18, 2024