Gigem314 said:AggieT said:
Recruiting numbers must be garbage. I wonder why.
Maybe the people who indirectly voted for drag queen story hour in the military should be sending their kids and grandkids.
Gigem314 said:AggieT said:
Recruiting numbers must be garbage. I wonder why.
Rossticus said:geoag58 said:Rossticus said:Tango.Mike said:Rossticus said:
Like John Wayne said, "Sure I wave the American flag. Do you know a better flag to wave? Sure I love my country with all her faults. I'm not ashamed of that, never have been, never will be."
If you wouldn't be willing to defend the US if it were attacked (which is the only conceivable scenario under which a draft would occur despite the lamentation of the pearl clutching alarmists) then you should identify one that you would, and move there. And if there is no country on the face of the earth you'd prefer to live in than the US and you'd still not fight, then there may be another problem. IMHO, of course.
Pretty ironic flex, since John Wayne was a draft dodger
Not a flex. Intentional to see how many of the folks sprinting to brag about how they'd dodge a draft would be critical out of the other side of their mouth. Wayne's chicken **** decision to avoid the war aside, what he said isn't any less reflective of my sentiments on the matter.
The US has myriad faults. Folks who wouldn't be willing to defend the country of their birth, where they choose to live, against an imminent threat should point out another country they'd prefer to live in and then elucidate why they're not there.
You need to quit posting and get ready to deploy biden boy
Have never voted DemocRAT in my life. This election will make my third straight for Trump. I'd like to tell you to do better but with an effort that lazy I'm not certain you're capable.
Artorias said:
My kids will never be reporting for a draft for a war that isn't a direct imminent threat to the homeland
jamey said:Hubert J. Farnsworth said:jamey said:Hubert J. Farnsworth said:jamey said:Hubert J. Farnsworth said:jamey said:Hubert J. Farnsworth said:jamey said:Artorias said:
My kids will never be reporting for a draft for a war that isn't a direct imminent threat to the homeland
Is that code for Russia is no threat and they have sweet shopping carts according to Tucker Carlson
Who the hell are you? Such a stupid post. Just another fly by premium poster I guess.
What else could that post mean?
It's at best only pro American if some agreed upon variable is met.
So whats the variable?
You were obviously mocking someone that doesn't want their kids fighting a war for our worthless government that has proven to have no interest in winning wars.
I'm looking for clarification from someone I suspect does not respect the worlds largest nuclear arsenal and doesn't consider it a threat despite it being controlled by a psychopath
It's a current fad
We have nukes too. Once those things start flying, we are all done for. Your mistake is thinking that Russia is the enemy. Our government has proven that they have zero interest in winning wars. They handcuff our soldiers with ridiculous ROE's while the enemy doesn't have to play by those rules. The last 20 years has proven that our government never wanted to win the war. I don't blame a soul for not wanting to fight for our government.
You make the mistake of thinking Russia is rational, much less not run by an evil authoritarian sitting on the words largest nuclear arsenal. Not a threat, you're naive
You aren't even talking Russia. You're mad at the US gov and saying Russia is OK because of it
Would you send your son to go fight for a government that had no intention of winning a war?
My daughter you mean and yes. I believe in America even if I'm not a fan of our politicians, both D and R.
It's not about our government, it's about the spread of evil that exists in the world, like Russia. You want to pretend Russia is not a threat becauseyou'ree mad at our government? Evil sociopath controls words largest nuclear arsenal is not a threat? Com'on
As messed up as many of our politicians are, most are not so far gone as to excuse Russia as not an enemy. At least not yet.
Would be nice if we could conduct a ground war right here against the illegal men invading, but we reward the illegal men rather than oppose them so don't need a single draftee.TAMU1990 said:one safe place said:
Draft? Just where is the ground war going to be?
Right here with the 20+ million illegal men Biden let in.
I am guessing you mean 50+ years ago, the draft ended 1973. Those draftees called up back then were needed in Europe and the Pacific and later Vietnam. We have no need for a draft, we are in no ground wars and should not be.B-1 83 said:I guess the same place it was 40+ years ago when registration began (again) and all those draftees were called up.one safe place said:
Draft? Just where is the ground war going to be?
When I went in for my physical prior to being drafted (but the draft ended), a lot of that was happening. I lived in a small town so we met at the county courthouse and they took boys from my small town and surrounding small towns into Houston. Many of the guys, most in fact, had notes from their family doctor that they had dizzy spells, or fainted due to this or that, and they were disqualified from the draft based on that alone. Again, this was toward the end of the draft and I guess they were pretty lax about it.chris1515 said:clarythedrill said:
For those of you who say you will never allow your kid to be drafted, what exactly are you going to do IF we have a draft and they are indeed drafted?
Payoff a podiatrist to say they have heel spurs?
I think you missed the word "again". It was stopped in about 1973 and then registration reintroduced in about 1979 when I registered. Nobody has been "called up" after the 1979 registration for any ground war.one safe place said:I am guessing you mean 50+ years ago, the draft ended 1973. Those draftees called up back then were needed in Europe and the Pacific and later Vietnam. We have no need for a draft, we are in no ground wars and should not be.B-1 83 said:I guess the same place it was 40+ years ago when registration began (again) and all those draftees were called up.one safe place said:
Draft? Just where is the ground war going to be?
Got you, thanks. I was just wondering if switching divisions was a thing. My Dad switched companies after Tarawa but still the same division. Iwo Jima was a ***** of places to be. My respect to your Dad for having been there.jja79 said:
My mistake. Guam and Iwo Jima.
In addition to the draft, as a layer in between civilian and draft, they introduced the Inactive Ready Reserve. All who had prior military service with time still left in their contract were recalled. If those troops ran out then they would institute a draft.B-1 83 said:I think you missed the word "again". It was stopped in about 1973 and then registration reintroduced in about 1979 when I registered. Nobody has been "called up" after the 1979 registration for any ground war.one safe place said:I am guessing you mean 50+ years ago, the draft ended 1973. Those draftees called up back then were needed in Europe and the Pacific and later Vietnam. We have no need for a draft, we are in no ground wars and should not be.B-1 83 said:I guess the same place it was 40+ years ago when registration began (again) and all those draftees were called up.one safe place said:
Draft? Just where is the ground war going to be?
HowdyTexasAggies said:jamey said:Hubert J. Farnsworth said:jamey said:Hubert J. Farnsworth said:jamey said:Hubert J. Farnsworth said:jamey said:Hubert J. Farnsworth said:jamey said:Artorias said:
My kids will never be reporting for a draft for a war that isn't a direct imminent threat to the homeland
Is that code for Russia is no threat and they have sweet shopping carts according to Tucker Carlson
Who the hell are you? Such a stupid post. Just another fly by premium poster I guess.
What else could that post mean?
It's at best only pro American if some agreed upon variable is met.
So whats the variable?
You were obviously mocking someone that doesn't want their kids fighting a war for our worthless government that has proven to have no interest in winning wars.
I'm looking for clarification from someone I suspect does not respect the worlds largest nuclear arsenal and doesn't consider it a threat despite it being controlled by a psychopath
It's a current fad
We have nukes too. Once those things start flying, we are all done for. Your mistake is thinking that Russia is the enemy. Our government has proven that they have zero interest in winning wars. They handcuff our soldiers with ridiculous ROE's while the enemy doesn't have to play by those rules. The last 20 years has proven that our government never wanted to win the war. I don't blame a soul for not wanting to fight for our government.
You make the mistake of thinking Russia is rational, much less not run by an evil authoritarian sitting on the words largest nuclear arsenal. Not a threat, you're naive
You aren't even talking Russia. You're mad at the US gov and saying Russia is OK because of it
Would you send your son to go fight for a government that had no intention of winning a war?
My daughter you mean and yes. I believe in America even if I'm not a fan of our politicians, both D and R.
It's not about our government, it's about the spread of evil that exists in the world, like Russia. You want to pretend Russia is not a threat becauseyou'ree mad at our government? Evil sociopath controls words largest nuclear arsenal is not a threat? Com'on
As messed up as many of our politicians are, most are not so far gone as to excuse Russia as not an enemy. At least not yet.
You are free to let your daughter die for Biden, no way in hell I'm sacrificing my kids for Biden.
HowdyTexasAggies said:jamey said:Hubert J. Farnsworth said:jamey said:Hubert J. Farnsworth said:jamey said:Hubert J. Farnsworth said:jamey said:Hubert J. Farnsworth said:jamey said:Artorias said:
My kids will never be reporting for a draft for a war that isn't a direct imminent threat to the homeland
Is that code for Russia is no threat and they have sweet shopping carts according to Tucker Carlson
Who the hell are you? Such a stupid post. Just another fly by premium poster I guess.
What else could that post mean?
It's at best only pro American if some agreed upon variable is met.
So whats the variable?
You were obviously mocking someone that doesn't want their kids fighting a war for our worthless government that has proven to have no interest in winning wars.
I'm looking for clarification from someone I suspect does not respect the worlds largest nuclear arsenal and doesn't consider it a threat despite it being controlled by a psychopath
It's a current fad
We have nukes too. Once those things start flying, we are all done for. Your mistake is thinking that Russia is the enemy. Our government has proven that they have zero interest in winning wars. They handcuff our soldiers with ridiculous ROE's while the enemy doesn't have to play by those rules. The last 20 years has proven that our government never wanted to win the war. I don't blame a soul for not wanting to fight for our government.
You make the mistake of thinking Russia is rational, much less not run by an evil authoritarian sitting on the words largest nuclear arsenal. Not a threat, you're naive
You aren't even talking Russia. You're mad at the US gov and saying Russia is OK because of it
Would you send your son to go fight for a government that had no intention of winning a war?
My daughter you mean and yes. I believe in America even if I'm not a fan of our politicians, both D and R.
It's not about our government, it's about the spread of evil that exists in the world, like Russia. You want to pretend Russia is not a threat becauseyou'ree mad at our government? Evil sociopath controls words largest nuclear arsenal is not a threat? Com'on
As messed up as many of our politicians are, most are not so far gone as to excuse Russia as not an enemy. At least not yet.
You are free to let your daughter die for Biden, no way in hell I'm sacrificing my kids for Biden.
BoydCrowder13 said:
I do kind of wish there was a kind of national service you would be required to do (men and women) when you turned 18. For 2 years.
I've always thought Israel's conscription is worthwhile. Either serve in the army, reserves, academic reserve (training intelligence or R&D) or pilot school. Maybe throw in another few non-combat type roles.
A couple of years and you get public college paid for (as the trade off). That would give young people a purpose and skills right off the bat. Help with student loans. And instill some national pride that has basically faded away.
chris1515 said:clarythedrill said:
For those of you who say you will never allow your kid to be drafted, what exactly are you going to do IF we have a draft and they are indeed drafted?
Payoff a podiatrist to say they have heel spurs?
Quote:
He had his draft status changed to 2-A "Special Exemption" by having his studio convince the draft board that his propaganda value was too high to serve. Yes, his propaganda value of making movies. In private, he said his concern was losing his spot in the Hollywood hierarchy when the war ended. John Wayne was a coward and a draft dodger
...
Quote:
Enacted on September 16, 1940, the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940 established the nation's first peacetime draft. Encoded within the Act were provisions governing who would register, who would be called to serve, and who would be exempted from service. There were four broad classes:
Class I: Available for Military Service.
Class II: Deferred Because of Occupation.
Class III: Deferred Because of Dependency.
Class IV: Unacceptable for Any Military Service.
Within the classes are categories of service eligibility/exemption. The ones relevant to your question are:
Class II-A: Deferred in support of national health, safety, or interest.
Class II-A (F): Previously rejected for military service.
Class II-B: Deferred in war production.
Class II-C: Deferred in agriculture.
Class III-A: Deferred for dependency reasons.
Class III-B: Deferred both by reason of dependency and occupation essential to the war effort.
Class III-C: Deferred both by reason of dependency and agricultural occupation.
Class III-D: Deferred by reason of extreme hardship and privation to wife, child, or parent.
Class IV-A: Deferred by reason of age.
Class IV-B: Public official deferred by law.
Class IV-C: Enemy alien unacceptable to armed forces and certain neutral aliens.
Class IV- D: Minister of religion or divinity student.
Class IV-E: Conscientious objectors were covered in this category. Some were deemed eligible for civilian service,
others were exempted from any sort of service.
Class IV-F: Rejected for military service for physical, mental or moral reasons.
4the_Record said:Quote:
He had his draft status changed to 2-A "Special Exemption" by having his studio convince the draft board that his propaganda value was too high to serve. Yes, his propaganda value of making movies. In private, he said his concern was losing his spot in the Hollywood hierarchy when the war ended. John Wayne was a coward and a draft dodger
...
Do you have a citation because this statement contrary to known details about the WW2 draft. John Wayne was married from 1933 to 1945. He was classified as 3A - family deferment, as a married man.
Further, some sources say he tried to enlist but was prevented doing so by Republic pictures, who owned his contract.
]
jamey said:HowdyTexasAggies said:jamey said:Hubert J. Farnsworth said:jamey said:Hubert J. Farnsworth said:jamey said:Hubert J. Farnsworth said:jamey said:Hubert J. Farnsworth said:jamey said:Artorias said:
My kids will never be reporting for a draft for a war that isn't a direct imminent threat to the homeland
Is that code for Russia is no threat and they have sweet shopping carts according to Tucker Carlson
Who the hell are you? Such a stupid post. Just another fly by premium poster I guess.
What else could that post mean?
It's at best only pro American if some agreed upon variable is met.
So whats the variable?
You were obviously mocking someone that doesn't want their kids fighting a war for our worthless government that has proven to have no interest in winning wars.
I'm looking for clarification from someone I suspect does not respect the worlds largest nuclear arsenal and doesn't consider it a threat despite it being controlled by a psychopath
It's a current fad
We have nukes too. Once those things start flying, we are all done for. Your mistake is thinking that Russia is the enemy. Our government has proven that they have zero interest in winning wars. They handcuff our soldiers with ridiculous ROE's while the enemy doesn't have to play by those rules. The last 20 years has proven that our government never wanted to win the war. I don't blame a soul for not wanting to fight for our government.
You make the mistake of thinking Russia is rational, much less not run by an evil authoritarian sitting on the words largest nuclear arsenal. Not a threat, you're naive
You aren't even talking Russia. You're mad at the US gov and saying Russia is OK because of it
Would you send your son to go fight for a government that had no intention of winning a war?
My daughter you mean and yes. I believe in America even if I'm not a fan of our politicians, both D and R.
It's not about our government, it's about the spread of evil that exists in the world, like Russia. You want to pretend Russia is not a threat becauseyou'ree mad at our government? Evil sociopath controls words largest nuclear arsenal is not a threat? Com'on
As messed up as many of our politicians are, most are not so far gone as to excuse Russia as not an enemy. At least not yet.
You are free to let your daughter die for Biden, no way in hell I'm sacrificing my kids for Biden.
Biden is irrelevant to Russia being an evil authoritarian government with the world's largest nuclear arsenal
ExactlyLogos Stick said:HowdyTexasAggies said:jamey said:Hubert J. Farnsworth said:jamey said:Hubert J. Farnsworth said:jamey said:Hubert J. Farnsworth said:jamey said:Hubert J. Farnsworth said:jamey said:Artorias said:
My kids will never be reporting for a draft for a war that isn't a direct imminent threat to the homeland
Is that code for Russia is no threat and they have sweet shopping carts according to Tucker Carlson
Who the hell are you? Such a stupid post. Just another fly by premium poster I guess.
What else could that post mean?
It's at best only pro American if some agreed upon variable is met.
So whats the variable?
You were obviously mocking someone that doesn't want their kids fighting a war for our worthless government that has proven to have no interest in winning wars.
I'm looking for clarification from someone I suspect does not respect the worlds largest nuclear arsenal and doesn't consider it a threat despite it being controlled by a psychopath
It's a current fad
We have nukes too. Once those things start flying, we are all done for. Your mistake is thinking that Russia is the enemy. Our government has proven that they have zero interest in winning wars. They handcuff our soldiers with ridiculous ROE's while the enemy doesn't have to play by those rules. The last 20 years has proven that our government never wanted to win the war. I don't blame a soul for not wanting to fight for our government.
You make the mistake of thinking Russia is rational, much less not run by an evil authoritarian sitting on the words largest nuclear arsenal. Not a threat, you're naive
You aren't even talking Russia. You're mad at the US gov and saying Russia is OK because of it
Would you send your son to go fight for a government that had no intention of winning a war?
My daughter you mean and yes. I believe in America even if I'm not a fan of our politicians, both D and R.
It's not about our government, it's about the spread of evil that exists in the world, like Russia. You want to pretend Russia is not a threat becauseyou'ree mad at our government? Evil sociopath controls words largest nuclear arsenal is not a threat? Com'on
As messed up as many of our politicians are, most are not so far gone as to excuse Russia as not an enemy. At least not yet.
You are free to let your daughter die for Biden, no way in hell I'm sacrificing my kids for Biden.
Yep.
Send your kid to die in a war overseas while an 18 year old illegal alien - who doesn't give two cents about this country - freely crosses the border to replace them?! No thanks. Why would anybody willingly die for that?
No native American kid, especially a white conservative, should die to protect a country where at least half of it hates them nor a piece of land where millions of illegals are invading every few months.
We live in and occupy an economic zone now. There is no country.
I am sure you and your kids will do finejamey said:BoydCrowder13 said:
I do kind of wish there was a kind of national service you would be required to do (men and women) when you turned 18. For 2 years.
I've always thought Israel's conscription is worthwhile. Either serve in the army, reserves, academic reserve (training intelligence or R&D) or pilot school. Maybe throw in another few non-combat type roles.
A couple of years and you get public college paid for (as the trade off). That would give young people a purpose and skills right off the bat. Help with student loans. And instill some national pride that has basically faded away.
We're in trouble if we have a full scale war with today's youth. They are a soft generation
Hubert J. Farnsworth said:
Rossticus said:
Like John Wayne said, "Sure I wave the American flag. Do you know a better flag to wave? Sure I love my country with all her faults. I'm not ashamed of that, never have been, never will be."
If you wouldn't be willing to defend the US if it were attacked (which is the only conceivable scenario under which a draft would occur despite the lamentation of the pearl clutching alarmists) then you should identify one that you would, and move there. And if there is no country on the face of the earth you'd prefer to live in than the US and you'd still not fight, then there may be another problem. IMHO, of course.
jamey said:Hubert J. Farnsworth said:jamey said:Hubert J. Farnsworth said:jamey said:Artorias said:
My kids will never be reporting for a draft for a war that isn't a direct imminent threat to the homeland
Is that code for Russia is no threat and they have sweet shopping carts according to Tucker Carlson
Who the hell are you? Such a stupid post. Just another fly by premium poster I guess.
What else could that post mean?
It's at best only pro American if some agreed upon variable is met.
So whats the variable?
You were obviously mocking someone that doesn't want their kids fighting a war for our worthless government that has proven to have no interest in winning wars.
I'm looking for clarification from someone I suspect does not respect the worlds largest nuclear arsenal and doesn't consider it a threat despite it being controlled by a psychopath
It's a current fad
MouthBQ98 said:
Millions of Americans did this during WWII, Korea, Vietnam, and the GWOT. Fight political battles here to make sure our combat involvement in war is justified, but when it comes to war fighting, it's our duty to nation and each other to show up. I signed up on my 18th birthday like most of my peers. Fight for your nation, politically first, if what it does with the military concerns you. Quit claiming you will take your ball and go home….
then leave the country you hippieLogos Stick said:MouthBQ98 said:
Millions of Americans did this during WWII, Korea, Vietnam, and the GWOT. Fight political battles here to make sure our combat involvement in war is justified, but when it comes to war fighting, it's our duty to nation and each other to show up. I signed up on my 18th birthday like most of my peers. Fight for your nation, politically first, if what it does with the military concerns you. Quit claiming you will take your ball and go home….
No mouth, I'm not fighting for this, nor will my descendants if I can help it.
You go ahead and send your children if you want:
https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3467957