I'm surprised he's going that far out on a limb.
Muh Polls
785,469 Views |
5734 Replies |
Last: 9 hrs ago by ts5641
I'm not sure what he means by stalled
that like in the polymarketRockdoc said:
I'm not sure what he means by stalled
he had been advancing steadily, peaked and now the race is getting closer
In my immediate fam
3 T are banked
2 more T saved for Election Day
3 T are banked
2 more T saved for Election Day
LMCane said:that like in the polymarketRockdoc said:
I'm not sure what he means by stalled
he had been advancing steadily, peaked and now the race is getting closer
Well he says stalled, then he says "wrapped"
Rockdoc said:
I'm not sure what he means by stalled
And why do we care what lobbyists think? They aren't campaign and election experts.
This is why I hate twitter.
I read it as Trump's momentum had stalled and his reply is that the election is over and that Harris will win.
But what I think he means is that the democrats have shot their wad and it's going to be a Trump landslide
I read it as Trump's momentum had stalled and his reply is that the election is over and that Harris will win.
But what I think he means is that the democrats have shot their wad and it's going to be a Trump landslide
Mostly Foggy Recollection
Joined:
Oct 5, 2020
Posts:
7,774
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mark doesn't make predictions and he followed that up with a tweet saying as much. By stalled, he's saying Trump probably will have to stick to winning what he needs to win, because VA/NH isn't going to happen … ie "stalled"
Didn't he say yesterday that VA and NH were in real play?
That's 2 different Marks tweeting; not the same guy.
Mostly Foggy Recollection
Joined:
Oct 5, 2020
Posts:
7,774
How long do you want to ignore this user?
rathAG05 said:
Didn't he say yesterday that VA and NH were in real play?
Mark from Rasmussen said that. Mark Halperin did not.
Today SP&R releases its latest Nevada poll in the race for United States Senate showing GOP challenger S. Brown with a .8% lead over incumbent J. Rosen:
— SP&R (@SusquehannaPR) November 1, 2024
J. Rosen: 46.2%
S. Brown: 47.0%
Not Sure: 2%
Other: .5%
Refuse: 4.2%
Sample Size 400 LV
Field Dates 10/28-10/31
MoE: +/-4.9% pic.twitter.com/xAbapwZnsK
This is a horrible, trash poll. 400LV and a 4.9% MOE.
I'd love for Brown to win, but Rosen is going to beat him by at least 4pts and it is unfortunate to say, because he is a combat vet wounded in action, but his facial scars scare people.
I'd love for Brown to win, but Rosen is going to beat him by at least 4pts and it is unfortunate to say, because he is a combat vet wounded in action, but his facial scars scare people.
Two different Mark's tweeting there. One says he is stalled, the other says he is wrapped.Rockdoc said:LMCane said:that like in the polymarketRockdoc said:
I'm not sure what he means by stalled
he had been advancing steadily, peaked and now the race is getting closer
Well he says stalled, then he says "wrapped"
txags92 said:Two different Mark's tweeting there. One says he is stalled, the other says he is wrapped.Rockdoc said:LMCane said:that like in the polymarketRockdoc said:
I'm not sure what he means by stalled
he had been advancing steadily, peaked and now the race is getting closer
Well he says stalled, then he says "wrapped"
Which one should we believe?
FireAg said:txags92 said:Two different Mark's tweeting there. One says he is stalled, the other says he is wrapped.Rockdoc said:LMCane said:that like in the polymarketRockdoc said:
I'm not sure what he means by stalled
he had been advancing steadily, peaked and now the race is getting closer
Well he says stalled, then he says "wrapped"
Which one should we believe?
📊 MICHIGAN poll by Mitchell Research for Michigan News Source
— InteractivePolls (@IAPolls2022) October 31, 2024
🟥 Trump: 48%
🟦 Harris: 47%
——
MI Senate
🟥 Rogers: 49%
🟦 Slotkin: 47%
Last poll - 🔵 Slotkin 47-43%
——
#59 (2.4/3.0) | 10/28-29 | LV | ±2.46%https://t.co/YAwUqIWEZd pic.twitter.com/QAiek9hYD8
That's one helluva flip!
That's a nice one.
aggiehawg said:📊 MICHIGAN poll by Mitchell Research for Michigan News Source
— InteractivePolls (@IAPolls2022) October 31, 2024
🟥 Trump: 48%
🟦 Harris: 47%
——
MI Senate
🟥 Rogers: 49%
🟦 Slotkin: 47%
Last poll - 🔵 Slotkin 47-43%
——
#59 (2.4/3.0) | 10/28-29 | LV | ±2.46%https://t.co/YAwUqIWEZd pic.twitter.com/QAiek9hYD8
That's one helluva flip!
How is that even possible?
These wild swings are becoming bizarre…
The guy from Rasmussen. Halperin is too partisan and as we get closer to the election he shows it more and more. Why is his evening streams without Spicer have a tiny audience watching compared to the morning stream with Spicer. Morning has 12-15 thousand in the audience. Evening stream with Halperin never craced 2,000 last night.FireAg said:txags92 said:Two different Mark's tweeting there. One says he is stalled, the other says he is wrapped.Rockdoc said:LMCane said:that like in the polymarketRockdoc said:
I'm not sure what he means by stalled
he had been advancing steadily, peaked and now the race is getting closer
Well he says stalled, then he says "wrapped"
Which one should we believe?
FireAg said:txags92 said:Two different Mark's tweeting there. One says he is stalled, the other says he is wrapped.Rockdoc said:LMCane said:that like in the polymarketRockdoc said:
I'm not sure what he means by stalled
he had been advancing steadily, peaked and now the race is getting closer
Well he says stalled, then he says "wrapped"
Which one should we believe?
One way to get past the stall is to wrap. Some purists don't like it but that stall can really throw off the timing for your BBQ.
I choose to believe this poll telling me that Sam Brown has a chance to win. He's a beautiful human beingGaeilge said:
This is a horrible, trash poll. 400LV and a 4.9% MOE.
I'd love for Brown to win, but Rosen is going to beat him by at least 4pts and it is unfortunate to say, because he is a combat vet wounded in action, but his facial scars scare people.
Video at LINKQuote:
Data expert Nate Silver is known for making big calls on elections and at the poker table, and right now, those two worlds have converged as both presidential election polls and betting markets show momentum building for Donald Trump and declining for Kamala Harris with less than a week to go before Election Day.
Silver is on the record since last week as saying the odds favor Trump he laid out his call in a New York Times op-ed but he also described it as a "gut instinct" rather than more certain data science. In an interview with CNBC's "Closing Bell: Overtime" anchor Jon Fortt at the CNBC Technology Executive Council Summit in New York City on Tuesday, Silver laid out several big caveats about current polling and betting markets.
Silver told Fortt that his current model shows the odds favoring Trump, who holds a 55% to 45% win probability advantage over Harris.
But he also said for any anecdotal example he can offer as to why Trump's momentum is peaking, "there is a counter example."
Trump's momentum in the polls has narrowed or erased Harris's lead in some key swing states, but Silver says he thinks that after two cycles in a row in which the polls were "pretty bad" and plenty of criticism pointed at the polling industry ever since 2016, "a lot of pollsters are throwing up their hands."
"They're printing a tie," Silver said at the CNBC event, giving the example of a hypothetical pollster conversation: "'Harris is up 3%? Let's say 1%. Trump up by 4? Let's say 1.5%. There is what we call herding, where people are gravitating towards the consensus. They don't want opinions too out of line."
Another factor that could be skewing the polls is if Trump's voters are more "charged up and excited," which might lead them to partake in more polls than they have historically, and lead Harris-leaning voters to partake in polls less.
Political polling is never as precise as people expect, Silver said, noting that in most scenarios if you modeled a 52%-48% edge and it turned out to be the reverse, that would still be pretty close. But political polling is an exception, and it is getting even more difficult for the polls to get things right.
Election 2024: Trump +3 Over Harris in Final Poll
— Rasmussen Reports (@Rasmussen_Poll) November 1, 2024
Former President Donald Trump has a three-point lead over Vice President Kamala Harris in our final national poll of the 2024 presidential election.
More At Rasmussen Reports:https://t.co/w8140u5LAG pic.twitter.com/p8WKA83AhO
📊 Final Polling by YouGov/@thetimes
— InteractivePolls (@IAPolls2022) November 1, 2024
PENNSYLVANIA
🟦 Harris: 49% (+3)
🟥 Trump: 46%
—
WISCONSIN
🟦 Harris: 49% (+4)
🟥 Trump: 45%
—
MICHIGAN
🟦 Harris: 48% (+3)
🟥 Trump: 45%
—
NEVADA
🟦 Harris: 48% (+1)
🟥 Trump: 47%
—
ARIZONA
🟦 Harris: 48% (=)
🟥 Trump: 48%
—
GEORGIA
🟥… pic.twitter.com/VuC6YMzOyD
Only 1 working day left before the majority of the country votes:
Trump is in a good place per the polls.
Trump is in a good place per the polls.
Agreed but hundred is billions is at stake, I'll believe it when the final results are in, maybe the swearing in. Too much money is at risk for those in power. Ironic it took a billionaire to threaten their kleptocracy
I'm cautiously optimistic. I think there's enough people who will vote for Trump without telling anyone, pollsters included, to remove any margin of error we see in all polls. I refuse to believe a significant number of people outside of whacked out dems can't see the smear campaign against Trump for what it is. The Nazi, Hitler, Fascist rhetoric in my opinion will the the main factor in Trump winning.
I do think there is still a larger contingent of shy trump voters who will assuredly vote for him in the ballot box but is afraid to publicly state so
#New General election poll - Florida - Puerto Rican Voters
— Political Polls (@PpollingNumbers) November 1, 2024
🔵 Harris 85%
🔴 Trump 8%
UCF - 150 LV - 10/30
Yeesh…wish you hadn't fixed it..lol
It's meaningless
Quote:
To help cut through the noise and give a clearer picture of where things stand, I spoke with Mark Mitchell, the head pollster at Rasmussen Reports, for his read on the race in these final days.
He told me he's seeing an election comparable to 1980.
"I think this is Reagan/Carter," Mitchell told me. "I think there are very specific reasons."
He explained, "I thought this whole time that Trump would outperform my polling," largely because voter loyalty has shifted, and traditional party affiliation "means a lot less." To account for this, Mitchell adjusted Rasmussen's polling method to "weight by recall vote," which focuses on how voters cast their ballots in 2020, rather than relying solely on demographics like age, gender, or race.
LINKQuote:
Mitchell's polling has shown Trump with a consistent lead, even "up two points nationally," revealing a "mind change of about 6-7 points" from Biden to Trump from 2020 to 2024. He attributes this shift to "low propensity voters crawling over broken glass to vote Trump" while some Democrat-leaning voters stay "on the couch in traditional blue areas." Mitchell argues that the polling industry is still "a little bit left" of reality and underestimates the enthusiasm among Trump's base.
Featured Stories
See All
26:14
1h ago
590
LIVE: No. 20 Texas A&M vs. Oregon (Players Era Festival)
by Luke Evangelist
51:31
2h ago
1.2k
DannyDuberstein
Interesting comments about the defense from Elko
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
214
2nd Generation Ag
Interesting comments about the defense from Elko
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
103