PlaneCrashGuy said:74OA said:A professional interview includes Q&A and probing/challenging the responses, not just sitting there and listening to a nonstop history lecture--the accuracy of which has been repeatedly debunked in recent years.PlaneCrashGuy said:74OA said:Based on Tucker's minimal participation in it, a lecture?PlaneCrashGuy said:74OA said:
Putin laughs at Tucker after the "interview".
SOFTBALL
You put interview in quotes for some reason. I'm curious, what would you call it?
What were you expecting? Did you Think Tucker flew all the way to Moscow to listen to himself talk?
As the article points out, even Putin laughed at Tucker's passivity.
Agreed, but it's childish to try to say it wasn't an interview because it hurtz feelz.
I appreciated the lack of too many interruptions or questions from Tucker. So often, journalists, in the name of whatever bias they represent, don't allow interviewees to answer questions fully because they have a narrative to push.
Step outside that narrative means the reporter must immediately push back, according to western journos.
I wish many more interview were conducted in this way so that we could hear full responses and make our own decisions on the content