I would vote for you.
Seriously, this is from
Leeham (admittedly a staunch critic of Boeing) 4 years ago about the situation. And Scott (as well as his wife) are far left politically (as in, greenpeace types who suffer from intense TDS). But the criticisms about the board's composition post-merger through to today are/were valid.
Excerpt (read the whole thing, fwiw/my two cents):
Quote:
Who the Board needs
The Board does not have a single person versed in aerospace engineering and safety.
Admirals Edmund Giambastiani and John Richardson are from the nuclear Navy. Certainly their experience in nuclear safety is nothing to sneeze at. But it's not aerospace.
The aerospace safety committee created by the Board in August and announced a month later consists Larry Kellner, the former CEO of Continental Airlines, Giambastiani, Richardson and Lynn Good, CEO of an energy company.
These four may know how to navigate among safety regulations, but they aren't aerospace engineers or aviation safety experts. (During Kellner's five years as CEO, there were only one fatal accident at Continental. One involved a ground mechanic being sucked into an engine. One other accident involved a 737 skidding off the runway and catching fire. Nobody died.)
Eight of the 13 Boeing Board members were on the Board when the MAX program was launched in July 2011 by then-CEO Jim McNerney. Calhoun was named to the Board in 2009. One Board member was named in 2007 and another in 2004. Everyone one of these Board members were in place when Dennis Muilenburg was named chairman, president and CEO. Lynn Good also falls into the latter action.
And hiring a
KPMG consultant (and Schwab/collins stepping down) and earlier replacing Nikki Haley (Rino) did not…change the board, net, for the positive, imho. It's…a **** show, still, of PC non-aviation low-IQ morons.
Frankly, since this is F16, I think Nikki should still be grilled about her time as a Boeing board member since she clearly, imho, failed to help the company in many ways in this job.