Crowder says he has trans shooter manifesto

18,513 Views | 144 Replies | Last: 10 mo ago by The System
Robert L. Peters
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rocky Rider said:

Looks like his fire was stoked by the hatred he's been taught related to white privilege. Not surprised.


His? It's a chick. Let's not play the insanity game.
What you say, Paper Champion? I'm gonna beat you like a dog, a dog, you hear me!
American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm confused. So the shooter was a chick who pretended to be a boy, who hated the other boys and called them ******s because maybe they liked other boys but didn't want to pretend to be girls so he/she wanted to kill them because she was envious that they were getting other girls or maybe boys which maybe would have been okay if they would pretend to be girls and not just ******s?

Do I have that right? It is almost impossible to wrap your head around that derangement.
CoppellAg93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
American Hardwood said:

I'm confused. So the shooter was a chick who pretended to be a boy, who hated the other boys and called them ******s because maybe they liked other boys but didn't want to pretend to be girls so he/she wanted to kill them because she was envious that they were getting other girls or maybe boys which maybe would have been okay if they would pretend to be girls and not just ******s?

Do I have that right? It is almost impossible to wrap your head around that derangement.
It's impossible to wrap my head around that run-on sentence.
CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You lost me.
Pizza
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CoppellAg93 said:

American Hardwood said:

I'm confused. So the shooter was a chick who pretended to be a boy, who hated the other boys and called them ******s because maybe they liked other boys but didn't want to pretend to be girls so he/she wanted to kill them because she was envious that they were getting other girls or maybe boys which maybe would have been okay if they would pretend to be girls and not just ******s?

Do I have that right? It is almost impossible to wrap your head around that derangement.
It's impossible to wrap my head around that run-on sentence.
American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CDUB98 said:

You lost me.
You passed your sanity check today. Congratulations.
CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
American Hardwood said:

CDUB98 said:

You lost me.
You passed your sanity check today. Congratulations.
Miracles still happen!!
Pizza
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This female didn't get charged with a hate crime....yet she targeted people based on race per her sad little diatribe.

Wtf fbi?
Line Ate Member
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pluralizes Everythings said:

This female didn't get charged with a hate crime....yet she targeted people based on race per her sad little diatribe.

Wtf fbi?
Isn't the shooter dead?
pacecar02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The censoring of the images just bolsters its credibility

I'm going with its legit
Pizza
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Line Ate Member said:

Pluralizes Everythings said:

This female didn't get charged with a hate crime....yet she targeted people based on race per her sad little diatribe.

Wtf fbi?
Isn't the shooter dead?


Yes? Still throw something out there post mortem idgaf.

ETA: the fbi does not believe this was a hate crime according to some people. Need better source.
Rocky Rider
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Robert L. Peters said:

Rocky Rider said:

Looks like his fire was stoked by the hatred he's been taught related to white privilege. Not surprised.


His? It's a chick. Let's not play the insanity game.
Frankly I'd lost track of he/she/it... Not trying to make a political statement.
Actual Talking Thermos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hungry Ojos said:

you can't even look at handwriting samples anymore to draw any conclusions
Handwriting analysis is mostly bull**** anyway. Can semi-reliably tell you if the same person wrote two things, but all the psychological analysis type stuff might as well be palm reading.
Bocephus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CactusThomas said:

Rich white homo that hates rich white homos.


Kinda what I saw. He/she (I don't remember the gender at birth) was using words you're not supposed to use.
TAMU ‘98 Ole Miss ‘21
hph6203
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There's more, he just doesn't have it. You can see the ink/writing impressions through the paper.
.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
At least the **** is dead. Too bad she had to take so many innocent people with her.
Currently a happy listless vessel and deplorable. #FDEMS TRUMP 2024.
Fight Fight Fight.
MonkeyKnifeFighter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CDUB98 said:

The Fife said:

I feel like this is real because of how non-earth shattering it is. Sort of, "that's it?" where the truth is so much smaller than what was actually being concealed.

Sorry leftists, looks like this one really was one of your people.
Exactly.

This is the reason why it was suppressed.
Ace sums it up nicely

Quote:

Two things were determinative in the Regime's suppression of this document.

First, of course, the Regime will allow minority groups like Muslims and transgenders to openly demonize their enemies, calling for their eradication and spreading absurd claims about the "genocide" being inflicted on them. Both Muslims and transgenders are constantly crying about imaginary "genocides."

This rhetoric justifies all violence, because if someone is committing "genocide" against you, obviously you have the right to oppose that genocide with any violence within your means -- even slaughtering children, as both the transgender child killer and the Hamas child killers did.

The Regime allows this kind of incendiary, eliminationist rhetoric from its Client Groups, but ruthlessly deplatforms and debanks anyone who merely criticizes its Client Groups.

And The Regime considers it "too dangerous" for its Client Groups for the public to even read what members of its Client Groups write in their Murder Manifestos.

They're allowed to engage in eliminationist, terrorist rhetoric -- but then the Regime covers up this rhetoric to protect its Client Groups from "blowback" and "backlash."

Instead of telling its Client Groups to tamp down on its support for murdering children, it will just hide that support for murdering children.

They're allowed to say it -- you're just not allowed to report that they said it.
Two other words were the most critical in the Regime's decision to once again lie to the public. Those two words are "White privileges."

There is a Hate That Dare Not Speak Its Name, and that is anti-white bigotry, which the Regime alternately justifies or denies the existence of.

The Regime considers it to be acceptable collateral damage if some of the anti-white rhetoric it encourages in order to keep the leftwing coalition intact by hating a common enemy results in some white children being murdered.

And the Regime also insists that whites can never be the victims of hatred, only the perpetrators of it. The loudest members of one of its Client Groups, the black radicals, insist that there's no such thing as anti-white racism and also insist that if there is anti-white hate, it is deserved. And the Regime dare not contradict this utmost demand of the black radicals.

JJxvi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Probably the part that law enforcement finds so dangerous is the part where she says that she almost got caught last summer or something similar. There's probably some background where law enforcement knew or should have known but didn't do anything.
Muy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
texagbeliever said:

I'm not a marketing expert, but I wouldn't use my companies Brand to watermark trademark the manifesto of a mass murderer. Not the brand association I'd want.


What?!
hph6203
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
29 journals are on that list.
.
PigInABlanket
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rocky Rider said:

Robert L. Peters said:

Rocky Rider said:

Looks like his fire was stoked by the hatred he's been taught related to white privilege. Not surprised.


His? It's a chick. Let's not play the insanity game.
Frankly I'd lost track of he/she/it... Not trying to make a political statement.

I believe the correct pronouns are was/were
pdc093
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hph6203 said:

29 journals are on that list.
Most are probably years old and have nothing to do with the shooting. Some might even be from her childhood, given how some people keep journals from the time they're kids.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Muy said:

texagbeliever said:

I'm not a marketing expert, but I wouldn't use my companies Brand to watermark trademark the manifesto of a mass murderer. Not the brand association I'd want.


What?!
I just wouldn't want to associate my brand with an incident where kids were hunted for sport by a psycho. People associate brands based on the setting observed. It is why people think of bikinis and hot chicks when they think of beer (at least in the early 2000s). I get Crowder is wanting to make sure he gets credit for it, just not sure how short sighted that is.
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
pdc093 said:





So he's a lying pos?
Satellite of Love
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hungry Ojos said:

Yes. The first two pics don't even look like the same handwriting.

Plus, the language used (a gay person calling people the f word) doesn't square.

Finally, how does someone like Crowder get possession of this before anyone else?

Could be real, just skeptical.
You haven't spent much time around gay people have you? They can be ruthless and petty while using the same slurs straight people have used on them.
SockStilkings
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Satellite of Love said:

Hungry Ojos said:

Yes. The first two pics don't even look like the same handwriting.

Plus, the language used (a gay person calling people the f word) doesn't square.

Finally, how does someone like Crowder get possession of this before anyone else?

Could be real, just skeptical.
You haven't spent much time around gay people have you? They can be ruthless and petty while using the same slurs straight people have used on them.
Is it like when certain people of color use a forbidden word but people not of color cannot use word or their lives will be ruined?

Language is so tough these days. It does not matter how a word is used nor any other context. Certain words and phrases are not allowed if a certain person uses the word, regardless of audience or context, whilst others may freely use the word, even use it in context and with purpose that made the word / phrases abhorrent in the first place.
Pizza
How long do you want to ignore this user?
texagbeliever said:

Muy said:

texagbeliever said:

I'm not a marketing expert, but I wouldn't use my companies Brand to watermark trademark the manifesto of a mass murderer. Not the brand association I'd want.


What?!
I just wouldn't want to associate my brand with an incident where kids were hunted for sport by a psycho. People associate brands based on the setting observed. It is why people think of bikinis and hot chicks when they think of beer (at least in the early 2000s). I get Crowder is wanting to make sure he gets credit for it, just not sure how short sighted that is.


I agree, crowder is just trying to stay relevant. I liked what he was trying to do, but unless he has made changes, I'm not too interested in what he has to say.
schmellba99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hungry Ojos said:

Yes. The first two pics don't even look like the same handwriting.

Plus, the language used (a gay person calling people the f word) doesn't square.

Finally, how does someone like Crowder get possession of this before anyone else?

Could be real, just skeptical.
No different than black people calling each other the N word, white guys joking around calling each other cracker, mexicans calling one another the W word, etc. You thinking this is unusual is strange to me.
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yall are talking about a child killer as a normal person...
SockStilkings
How long do you want to ignore this user?
schmellba99 said:

Hungry Ojos said:

Yes. The first two pics don't even look like the same handwriting.

Plus, the language used (a gay person calling people the f word) doesn't square.

Finally, how does someone like Crowder get possession of this before anyone else?

Could be real, just skeptical.
No different than black people calling each other the N word, white guys joking around calling each other cracker, mexicans calling one another the W word, etc. You thinking this is unusual is strange to me.
Hold on a sec. How often do you hear a group of white guys sitting around calling each other cracker?

Regarding Mexicans, they will call each other names but it is often a spanish term and has nothing to do with the dampness of the upper posterior surfaces.

Gays calling others nicknames for cigarettes and Blacks using the "n" word are somewhat unique in their social pervasiveness.
SockStilkings
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MonkeyKnifeFighter said:

Just checked my notes.

When do we get the rest of it?

19 journals, 11 videos


More than anything, it seems this inventory of evidence is not going to bode well for the parents of the shooter in any civil matters that may arise. It would also seem that it should result in criminal charges against them.

Evidently this deranged individual left plenty of calling cards laying around and stuffed all over the house.
Actual Talking Thermos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Satellite of Love said:

Hungry Ojos said:

Yes. The first two pics don't even look like the same handwriting.

Plus, the language used (a gay person calling people the f word) doesn't square.

Finally, how does someone like Crowder get possession of this before anyone else?

Could be real, just skeptical.
You haven't spent much time around gay people have you? They can be ruthless and petty while using the same slurs straight people have used on them.
A hilarious hour of a very lefty podcast host with two very gay guests, who relentlessly mock Queer Eye and deride the stars for acting like "heinous f**gots."



It's less that these people get a pass from the left at large and more that these are patron saints of the "dirtbag left," basically socialists who have never subscribed to the PC sensitivity aspects of the American left and refuse to let the right have a monopoly on vulgarity and humor.
one safe place
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Never understood how a word or phrase can be hurtful. I think the feeling of "hurt" is fake. But then I have thick skin.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.