Hillary "Warns" That Russia Will Interfere in 2024 Election

4,963 Views | 53 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by rocky the dog
Rapier108
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:17p, 9/24/23
Quote:
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sat down with MSNBC's Jen Psaki for an interview that aired on Sunday and said that we should be talking about potential election interference leading up to 2024.

"He has indeed interfered in our elections in the past," Psaki said, referring to Russian President Vladimir Putin. "It's not something, as you experienced firsthand, is not something we talk about a lot. Do you fear that that is something that could be happening for 2024, do you think we should be talking about it more?"

Clinton said we should be talking about potential election interference more because she had "no doubt" he has done it before.

"I don't think, despite all of the deniers, there is any doubt that he interfered in our election, or that he has interfered in many ways in the internal affairs of other countries, funding political parties, funding political candidates, buying off government officials in different places," she began.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/hillary-clinton-warns-potential-election-interference-2024-hell-do-it-again

One would think the Democrats could come up with something new, but all they do is recycle the same old playbook over and over.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Reply Quote
32
Ag with kids
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:22p, 9/24/23
AG
It wasn't Russia, Hillary. It was YOU.
Reply Quote
191
Post removed:
by user
10:24p, 9/24/23
APHIS AG
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rapier108 • 10:24p, 9/24/23
Rapier108 said:
Quote:
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sat down with MSNBC's Jen Psaki for an interview that aired on Sunday and said that we should be talking about potential election interference leading up to 2024.

"He has indeed interfered in our elections in the past," Psaki said, referring to Russian President Vladimir Putin. "It's not something, as you experienced firsthand, is not something we talk about a lot. Do you fear that that is something that could be happening for 2024, do you think we should be talking about it more?"

Clinton said we should be talking about potential election interference more because she had "no doubt" he has done it before.

"I don't think, despite all of the deniers, there is any doubt that he interfered in our election, or that he has interfered in many ways in the internal affairs of other countries, funding political parties, funding political candidates, buying off government officials in different places," she began.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/hillary-clinton-warns-potential-election-interference-2024-hell-do-it-again

One would think the Democrats could come up with something new, but all they do is recycle the same old playbook over and over.
Well, you stick with whatever works and this has worked for the Democrats for a very long time.

That is why they are masters of the "big lie".
Reply Quote
16
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rapier108 • 10:26p, 9/24/23
AG
Quote:
"I don't think, despite all of the deniers, there is any doubt that he interfered in our election, or that he has interfered in many ways in the internal affairs of other countries, funding political parties, funding political candidates, buying off government officials in different places," she began.
As Sec of State, she woud know when the US caused coups and phony elections
Reply Quote
28
Viper16
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:30p, 9/24/23
AG
She misspelled DemocRat.
Lex Talionis.......Ordo Seclorum
Reply Quote
10
AggieMD95
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:31p, 9/24/23
AG
I'm in favor if Dems lose
Reply Quote
5
Viper16
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Viper16 • 10:31p, 9/24/23
AG
Disregard
Lex Talionis.......Ordo Seclorum
Reply Quote
2 edits
DD88
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:32p, 9/24/23
AG
She got another Steele Dossier in the works?
Reply Quote
30
Aggie4Life02
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:41p, 9/24/23
AG
The world will be a better place after she dies.
Reply Quote
47
91AggieLawyer
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 11:19p, 9/24/23
AG
aggiehawg said:
Quote:
"I don't think, despite all of the deniers, there is any doubt that he interfered in our election, or that he has interfered in many ways in the internal affairs of other countries, funding political parties, funding political candidates, buying off government officials in different places," she began.
As Sec of State, she woud know when the US caused coups and phony elections

That might be true if she actually did anything as SecOfState. In reality, it was her world fund raising tour for the Clinton foundation. The amount of work for the state department was minimal. That's why she had that private server. Not only did they not want anyone to know where and by whom she was getting money from, but they didn't want anyone to know who was actually doing State Department work that she wasn't.

I wouldn't be surprised if YOU did more for the State department than she did. In fact, I'd probably bet on it.
Reply Quote
6
captkirk
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:21p, 9/24/23
AG
Reply Quote
17
Phatbob
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rapier108 • 11:44p, 9/24/23
AG
Rapier108 said:

It's not something, as you experienced firsthand, is not something we talk about a lot.



Ahahahahaha
Reply Quote
2
YouBet
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:54p, 9/24/23
AG
She is such a pathetic hag. ***** was caught funding a coup against her own president, but still has the gall to whine about Putin putting bots on Facebook to try and tricksy some LIVs.
Reply Quote
29
rab79
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aggie4Life02 • 1:04a, 9/25/23
AG
Aggie4Life02 said:
The world will be a better place after she dies.
And hell will be a worse place with her passing.
Reply Quote
1
Stat Monitor Repairman
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:33a, 9/25/23
It's 2023 and we still listening to Bill Clinton's battle axe of a wife.

Lady rode the coat tails of her husband and made hay while the sun shined. I'll give her credit for that, but its 2023 and we still hearing about this crazy lady and what she thinks about the world.

Some sort of carpetbagger to New York and the people absolutely love her.

Maybe the most annoying lady of all time.

Half of what got Donald Trump elected is the fact that Hillary was absolutely insufferable.

So they traded that for mean tweets.
Reply Quote
17
2 edits
Stat Monitor Repairman
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:38a, 9/25/23
Who is more unlikable than Hillary?

Hillary's existence is proof we live in a simulation.
Reply Quote
4
e=mc2
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:43a, 9/25/23
AG
I can't post today. I guess I'll see you next Tuesday.
Reply Quote
6
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Stat Monitor Repairman • 3:58a, 9/25/23
AG
Granny cabbage farts wholly ignoring her own pee dossier she procured via Russian propagandists.

This couple fear mongering about Russia is particularly humorous to those of us who remember their 'work;'



Reply Quote
11
richardag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:30a, 9/25/23
Well, in her defense she did approve the sale of uranium to Russia ,,,…. ,,, ….. er um Not in her defense
NY Times: Hillary Clinton Approved Russian Uranium Deal After $2 Million Donation to Clinton Foundation
change that to indictment.

Oh wait, we can't indict since she is a Democrat. In the immortal words of Emily Litella, "never-mind".
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Reply Quote
7
fc2112
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:35a, 9/25/23
Whenever I see or hear suggestions of "Russian interference" in the 2016 election, I ask 3 simple questions.

1. What specifically was the interference?

2. Why didn't the administration at the time do anything about it?

3. If it was successful, why didn't they do it again in 2020?

There is never a cogent answer provided to any of these.
Reply Quote
19
1 edit
Aggie4Life02
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to fc2112 • 6:11a, 9/25/23
AG
fc2112 said:
Whenever I see or hear suggestions of "Russian interference" in the 2016 election, I ask 3 simple questions.

1. What specifically was the interference?

2. Why didn't the administration at the time do anything about it?

3. If it was successful, why didn't they do it again in 2020?

There is never a cogent answer provided to any of these.



The lie is the point.
Reply Quote
6
Smittyfubar
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:24a, 9/25/23
AG
Got to grease the cheating wheels before they start to turn.
Reply Quote
2
ts5641
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rapier108 • 6:25a, 9/25/23
When Joe easily beats Trump will she still say this?
Reply Quote
Daddy
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rapier108 • 6:36a, 9/25/23
AG
Rapier108 said:
Quote:
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sat down with MSNBC's Jen Psaki for an interview that aired on Sunday and said that we should be talking about potential election interference leading up to 2024.

"He has indeed interfered in our elections in the past," Psaki said, referring to Russian President Vladimir Putin. "It's not something, as you experienced firsthand, is not something we talk about a lot. Do you fear that that is something that could be happening for 2024, do you think we should be talking about it more?"

Clinton said we should be talking about potential election interference more because she had "no doubt" he has done it before.

"I don't think, despite all of the deniers, there is any doubt that he interfered in our election, or that he has interfered in many ways in the internal affairs of other countries, funding political parties, funding political candidates, buying off government officials in different places," she began.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/hillary-clinton-warns-potential-election-interference-2024-hell-do-it-again

One would think the Democrats could come up with something new, but all they do is recycle the same old playbook over and over.


Whatever they say the opponent is doing that's what they are doing

2024
The Orangeman Returns with Thunder
Reply Quote
2
jja79
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:42a, 9/25/23
AG
Has the statute of limitations run out in whatever her crime was?
Reply Quote
1
Funky Winkerbean
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:45a, 9/25/23
AG
So Ukrainian aid is really just a frame job to keep Russia as our true enemy, while it's the Democrats destroying our country behind this cover.
Reply Quote
3
MouthBQ98
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Funky Winkerbean • 6:49a, 9/25/23
AG
The conflict creates the grift opportunity for many. You need sides to play against each other to exploit one or both by promising aid or influence.
Reply Quote
3
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:00a, 9/25/23
AG
Democrats/WEF are in perfect alignment.



Reply Quote
6
LOYAL AG
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:04a, 9/25/23
AG
I'm significantly less worried about the Russians interfering in the election than I am the FBI interfering in it. Russian interference is nebulous and difficult to pin down but it's undeniable that the FBI acted in very specific ways in 2016 and 2020. In 2020 it worked. Our own government is a significantly bigger threat to election integrity than is some Russian bot farm.
A fearful society is a compliant society. That's why Democrats and criminals prefer their victims to be unarmed. Gun Control is not about guns, it's about control.
Reply Quote
11
Rapier108
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to ts5641 • 8:15a, 9/25/23
ts5641 said:
When Joe easily beats Trump will she still say this?
Nope, she'll say Joe prevented the interference.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Reply Quote
DallasAg 94
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:22a, 9/25/23
Reply Quote
5
1 edit
rocky the dog
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:51a, 9/25/23
AG

Elections are when people find out what politicians stand for, and politicians find out what people will fall for.
Reply Quote
4
TxTarpon
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rapier108 • 8:52a, 9/25/23
Sounds like she is in contact with her handlers again.

Reply Quote
5
TexAgs91
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rapier108 • 8:57a, 9/25/23
AG
Rapier108 said:
Quote:
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sat down with MSNBC's Jen Psaki for an interview that aired on Sunday and said that we should be talking about potential election interference leading up to 2024.

"He has indeed interfered in our elections in the past," Psaki said, referring to Russian President Vladimir Putin. "It's not something, as you experienced firsthand, is not something we talk about a lot. Do you fear that that is something that could be happening for 2024, do you think we should be talking about it more?"

Clinton said we should be talking about potential election interference more because she had "no doubt" he has done it before.

"I don't think, despite all of the deniers, there is any doubt that he interfered in our election, or that he has interfered in many ways in the internal affairs of other countries, funding political parties, funding political candidates, buying off government officials in different places," she began.
Given that this kind of talk has proven to be seditious before, she should be sent to Gitmo for saying this.
Reply Quote
1
Page 1 of 2 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.