I'm in favor if Dems lose

Disregard

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

"I don't think, despite all of the deniers, there is any doubt that he interfered in our election, or that he has interfered in many ways in the internal affairs of other countries, funding political parties, funding political candidates, buying off government officials in different places," she began.

---

As Sec of State, she woud know when the US caused coups and phony elections

---

That might be true if she actually did anything as SecOfState. In reality, it was her world fund raising tour for the Clinton foundation. The amount of work for the state department was minimal. That's why she had that private server. Not only did they not want anyone to know where and by whom she was getting money from, but they didn't want anyone to know who was actually doing State Department work that she wasn't.

I wouldn't be surprised if YOU did more for the State department than she did. In fact, I'd probably bet on it.

Rapier108 said:

---

It's not something, as you experienced firsthand, is not something we talk about a lot.

---

Ahahahahaha

Aggie4Life02 said:

---

The world will be a better place after she dies.

---

And hell will be a worse place with her passing.

Who is more unlikable than Hillary?

Hillary's existence is proof we live in a simulation.

I can't post today. I guess I'll see you next Tuesday.

Well, in her defense she did approve the sale of uranium to Russia ,,,…. ,,, ….. er um Not in her defense
NY Times: Hillary Clinton Approved Russian Uranium Deal After $2 Million Donation to Clinton Foundation
change that to indictment.

Oh wait, we can't indict since she is a Democrat. In the immortal words of Emily Litella, "never-mind".

fc2112 said:

---

Whenever I see or hear suggestions of "Russian interference" in the 2016 election, I ask 3 simple questions.

1. What specifically was the interference?

2. Why didn't the administration at the time do anything about it?

3. If it was successful, why didn't they do it again in 2020?

There is never a cogent answer provided to any of these.

---

The lie is the point.

Got to grease the cheating wheels before they start to turn.

When Joe easily beats Trump will she still say this?

Rapier108 said:

---

Quote:

---

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sat down with MSNBC's Jen Psaki for an interview that aired on Sunday and said that we should be talking about potential election interference leading up to 2024.

"He has indeed interfered in our elections in the past," Psaki said, referring to Russian President Vladimir Putin. "It's not something, as you experienced firsthand, is not something we talk about a lot. Do you fear that that is something that could be happening for 2024, do you think we should be talking about it more?"

Clinton said we should be talking about potential election interference more because she had "no doubt" he has done it before.

"I don't think, despite all of the deniers, there is any doubt that he interfered in our election, or that he has interfered in many ways in the internal affairs of other countries, funding political parties, funding political candidates, buying off government officials in different places," she began.

---

https://www.foxnews.com/media/hillary-clinton-warns-potential-election-interference-2024-hell-do-it-again

One would think the Democrats could come up with something new, but all they do is recycle the same old playbook over and over.

---

Whatever they say the opponent is doing that's what they are doing

Has the statute of limitations run out in whatever her crime was?

So Ukrainian aid is really just a frame job to keep Russia as our true enemy, while it's the Democrats destroying our country behind this cover.

The conflict creates the grift opportunity for many. You need sides to play against each other to exploit one or both by promising aid or influence.

Democrats/WEF are in perfect alignment.

Funny because it's true 😜 https://t.co/YBp1r5kZdp pic.twitter.com/xc8MkmZ6TY

— Ivor Cummins (@FatEmperor) September 25, 2023

ts5641 said:

---

When Joe easily beats Trump will she still say this?

---

Nope, she'll say Joe prevented the interference.

Sounds like she is in contact with her handlers again.

Rapier108 said:

---

Quote:

---

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sat down with MSNBC's Jen Psaki for an interview that aired on Sunday and said that we should be talking about potential election interference leading up to 2024.

"He has indeed interfered in our elections in the past," Psaki said, referring to Russian President Vladimir Putin. "It's not something, as you experienced firsthand, is not something we talk about a lot. Do you fear that that is something that could be happening for 2024, do you think we should be talking about it more?"

Clinton said we should be talking about potential election interference more because she had "no doubt" he has done it before.

"I don't think, despite all of the deniers, there is any doubt that he interfered in our election, or that he has interfered in many ways in the internal affairs of other countries, funding political parties, funding political candidates, buying off government officials in different places," she began.

---

---

Given that this kind of talk has proven to be seditious before, she should be sent to Gitmo for saying this.