Burdizzo said:

---

Dude, I get it. You like hookers. You don't have to keep explaining it.

---

95% of this thread is "what am I going to do without my hookers and porn"

Dies Irae said:

---

Burdizzo said:

---

Dude, I get it. You like hookers. You don't have to keep explaining it.

---

95% of this thread is "what am I going to do without my hookers and porn"

---

Yeah, I accidentally dug up this post's grave only for it to get even more off topic lol

fka ftc said:

---

nai06 said:

---

AGC said:

---

Ag with kids said:

---

AGC said:

---

fka ftc said:

---

Ol_Ag_02 said:

---

Dies Irae said:

---

fka ftc said:

---

I typically find these takes come from folks who have struggled with porn addictions or who have otherwise been taught that shame and sexual activity go together.

How about you do you and keep porn out of your life and if you want to fight sex trafficking even better. But if you want to head down this path then I suspect you support bringing back criminal charges for marital infidelity and the like.

---

Fighting for the criminalization of pornography and increased penalties for prostitution are the best ways to track down on human trafficking possible.

---

I would argue that legalizing prostitution is the best method to combat human trafficking.

---

Correct. People generally do not "traffick" in legal things, certainly not at the same level.

Cocaine is more profitable than moonshine.

Prostitution is more profitable than titty dancing which is more profitable than burlesque shows.

---

Once again, you know nothing about trafficking. Third world women populate European brothels because they're desperate to escape their lives at home. Organized crime in Spain and Portugal, for instance, identifies women in central and South America and buys the airfare before keeping passports and saddling them with large debts to repay. They do it to the Africans who come over.

The supply of prostitutes has to be created - women don't wake up at age 11 and decide to spend 10 hours a day screwing randos with kinks for the rest of their life. It's not a thing.

---

We're talking about online access to porn here.

Stay focused.

And PLEASE do not go off on the horse ****ing tangent. That was too weird.

---

You've lost the thread. Porn is linked to trafficking and prostitution, as I already said. It's what Johns consume on their way to buy and want to act out. It's the only commonality they have.

Also porn incentivizes trafficking - traffickers film these women having sex and upload it. Most people (like you) don't even realize that's a lot of what you're watching. Because again, women are groomed or forced into the life.

So decreasing easy access and consumption helps other societal problems. Addressing porn has a multiplicative effect.

---

The thread is supposed to be about HB 1181 which seess to restrict minors' access to online pornography. It's got nothing to do with trafficking, prostitution, or pornography addiction.


Yet here we are.

---

And horses, please do not forget about the nonconsensual equine assaults.

---

This thread gave a WHOLE new meaning to "riding horses"...

If you think it's bad, then don't watch it or let your kids watch it

Exactly. That's why we're going to ban it by default and make perverts show their ID to get it.

If you think allowing porn to freely permeate the Internet is okay, then you are worse than the parents bringing their kids to drag shows.

There is some Common ground in making content filters more available and user friendly. As the owner of my home and the person responsible on the ISP account, then I should easily be able to say what material is allowed.

I understand fully can be done, but it is not user friendly and very difficult to manage across devices. Which should also be easily configurable.

That would make sense though. And completely defeat the point of the nanny state liberals AND "conservatives" want. If it doesn't involve the .gov telling you what to do, it's clearly evil.

The Supreme Court takes up four new cases (counting the consolidated cases as one). Among them: A First Amendment challenge to the Texas law that requires porn websites to verify users' age. https://t.co/bhFuTBv3ug pic.twitter.com/MOXks8Ayru

— Mark Joseph Stern (@mjs_DC) July 2, 2024

SCOTUS agrees to take up the case. We'll see if the Fifth Circuit leads again as the circuit being reversed the most.