🚨 BREAKING: Trump to sue DOJ for $100M over Mar-a-Lago raid, alleging 'political persecution'https://t.co/P6bURm9T5H
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) August 12, 2024
🚨 BREAKING: Trump to sue DOJ for $100M over Mar-a-Lago raid, alleging 'political persecution'https://t.co/P6bURm9T5H
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) August 12, 2024
The Biden White House—including his general counsel and chief of staff—colluded with NARA officials to first concoct a records destruction case then move to classified docs case after Trump produced 15 boxes to NARA in Jan 2022.
— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) August 12, 2024
Biden’s DOJ took it from there, advising NARA how… https://t.co/65kEavhMsE
One agent reached out to Morey and described the raid as Banana Republic style tactics: pic.twitter.com/U65YiuqzBG
— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) August 12, 2024
NEW: Trump's tort lawsuit notice for MAL raid discloses the former president has been forced to spend at least $60 million per year on legal fees since he left office.
— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) August 12, 2024
Sickening: pic.twitter.com/ksgoe2GCPM
🚨🚨 BREAKING: Jack Smith has just filed an appeal asking a federal court to reinstate the classified documents case against President Trump.
— JOSH DUNLAP (@JDunlap1974) August 26, 2024
Thoughts? pic.twitter.com/WUcSlXKFsp
Politics.jt2hunt said:🚨🚨 BREAKING: Jack Smith has just filed an appeal asking a federal court to reinstate the classified documents case against President Trump.
— JOSH DUNLAP (@JDunlap1974) August 26, 2024
Thoughts? pic.twitter.com/WUcSlXKFsp
jt2hunt said:🚨🚨 BREAKING: Jack Smith has just filed an appeal asking a federal court to reinstate the classified documents case against President Trump.
— JOSH DUNLAP (@JDunlap1974) August 26, 2024
Thoughts? pic.twitter.com/WUcSlXKFsp
will25u said:The Biden White House—including his general counsel and chief of staff—colluded with NARA officials to first concoct a records destruction case then move to classified docs case after Trump produced 15 boxes to NARA in Jan 2022.
— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) August 12, 2024
Biden’s DOJ took it from there, advising NARA how… https://t.co/65kEavhMsE
The guy in charge of NARA started the whole thing. He was about to retire when Trump left office and was watching the "transfer of power" and apparently saw Trump staff leaving the WH with boxes and decided that was not quite right and sent and email and it all fell out from that.Claverack said:will25u said:The Biden White House—including his general counsel and chief of staff—colluded with NARA officials to first concoct a records destruction case then move to classified docs case after Trump produced 15 boxes to NARA in Jan 2022.
— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) August 12, 2024
Biden’s DOJ took it from there, advising NARA how… https://t.co/65kEavhMsE
NARA is in for a world of hurt after this election.
That is not a good thing for a group who are supposed to collect and preserve our history in an impartial manner allowing others to make partisan assessments with the documentation. Their bread and butter has been service to both parties during and after their time in the White House. Choosing a side and colluding with them to create a crime is not a good look and will come with consequences with any level of Republican control after November.
Trump, if elected, needs to show no mercy to these bureaucrats. If not, then Republicans in Congress must give the National Archives and others the IRS/Lerner treatment. Cutting them off in funding is the only thing these folks will respect.
The John McClain of records administrators.Quote:
He was about to retire
Should have clarified I was going from memory. But I was sure he was about to retire, or change jobs or something.Stat Monitor Repairman said:The John McClain of records administrators.Quote:
He was about to retire
He probably at home right now posting photos of the meter reader on next-door.
A strong, shrewd amicus brief was filed yesterday in the appeal of Judge Cannon’s dismissal of US v Trump (MaL) for the AG’s alleged improper appt of Jack Smith. It urges reassignment to a new judge if the court reverses. I’ll encapsulate. ...
— Roger Parloff (@rparloff) September 4, 2024
1/18https://t.co/oxc4HLXeFX pic.twitter.com/uPTKpvb9qs
Seizing Trump's passport back in the news. .Quote:
Former President Trump should be forced to give up his passport to stop him from fleeing the country and avoiding prosecution if he loses the presidential election, according to ex-federal prosecutor Randall Eliason.
Stat Monitor Repairman said:
Aileen Cannon assigned Trump assassination case.
Ok, thank you drive through.
JUST IN - U.S. Department of Justice is evaluating how to wind down the two federal "criminal cases" against Trump — NBC
— Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) November 6, 2024
Now that Jack Smith's J6 case against Pres Trump is over, we will wait to see what DOJ does in FLA classified documents case.
— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) November 8, 2024
Smith currently is appealing Judge Cannon's July order dismissing the indictment based on Smith's unconstitutional appointment. If DOJ drops its appeal,… pic.twitter.com/ZUMtW6jAVs
BREAKING: Special counsel Jack Smith requests that the court throw out his appeal against Trump in Mar-a-Lago classified documents case
— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) November 13, 2024
Smith is expected to resign before Trump is inaugurated. pic.twitter.com/cyvaKZrIOM
will25u said:BREAKING: Special counsel Jack Smith requests that the court throw out his appeal against Trump in Mar-a-Lago classified documents case
— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) November 13, 2024
Smith is expected to resign before Trump is inaugurated. pic.twitter.com/cyvaKZrIOM
Let me explain what is actually happening here. Ifthe 11th Circuit rules in Jude Cannon's favor (and remember that Justice Thomas concurrence that could easily have started with, "Dear Judge Aileen Cannon, Jack Smith was not properly appointed and has no authority. HTH." it is likely they would so rule.Stat Monitor Repairman said:
The government filed a plea in abatement here. They simply is asking for more time to file a reply brief that already had a deadline. We'll have a better indication of what might happen here on December 2nd. So it's misleading to say that Smith is asking the court to 'throw out the appeal.' That's not what's happening here. We'll know in 3-weeks.