Trump indicted over classified documents

290,853 Views | 3683 Replies | Last: 7 days ago by richardag
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

One hundred and five page thread over basically yet another nothing burger. A lot of dumb takes in this thread.
Lots of people wanting to pin something, anything on DJT to justify their hate and full-fledged TDS.

They ignored the law, the US Constitution, the PRA, the role of NARA and then ignored the facts they didn't like.

Truly amazing to go through the first pages. To your credit Hawg, you based your take on the law and previous cases. Appreciate your input as always.

His biggest risk was also correctly pointed out by you and others would have been the "obstruction" charges, though if Jack Smith had focused on that I think we ultimately would have seen a SCOTUS case on whether you can be guilty of obstruction of justice for a case being investigated under false pretenses.

To me, that is something for Bondi to address down the road. Procedural crimes when the prosecutor cannot prove the underlying crime. Trump's NYC conviction gets at that a bit.
Muy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

One hundred and five page thread over basically yet another nothing burger. A lot of dumb takes in this thread.


Many a lib still repeat the same talking points about all the crimes Trump committed, they are cult members who can't be de-programmed.
Muy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not a bit, weren't they completely procedural crimes covering up non-crimes that none of us know about?
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Muy said:

Not a bit, weren't they completely procedural crimes covering up non-crimes that none of us know about?


Yes, i just was shy about being declaratory.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Truly amazing to go through the first pages. To your credit Hawg, you based your take on the law and previous cases. Appreciate your input as always.

His biggest risk was also correctly pointed out by you and others would have been the "obstruction" charges, though if Jack Smith had focused on that I think we ultimately would have seen a SCOTUS case on whether you can be guilty of obstruction of justice for a case being investigated under false pretenses.
As it has turned out, I was correct on a s*** ton of the legal lawfare over many years now. Those posters who attacked me and also frequently had me banned for simply laughing at them, have disappeared.

Sooo

Victory lap.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So so corrupt. Just to get one man.

flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Some folks knew this about 3-4 days after the "FBI raids Mar-a-Lago".

And it wasn't inside info, it was simple common sense, you know what I mean?
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
All of these people need to be imprisoned.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

All of these people need to be imprisoned.
How many have preemptive pardons?
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
First Page Refresh
Page 106 of 106
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.