Do you believe Biden received 81 million votes?

Your post makes me think you believe Biden received 81 million votes.

Opalka said:

---

....most of you have him already found innocent before any evidence has been presented!

---

You realize that someone is innocent until PROVEN guilty, right?

And in the absence of proof (now), the only reasonable conclusion is that he's innocent.

This Bragg dude is one giant pos.

Opalka said:

---

Man, reading through this entire thread is like being in the audience of the Jerry Springer Show. So much innuendo, "what if's", presumptions, conspiracy theories and downright false information. "This person's second cousin, once sat next to Bragg's dog's vet's assistant". Good Lord. Worried that Trump won't get a fair trial?....most of you have him already found innocent before any evidence has been presented!

It's really simple. There will be a jury, and they will get to see and hear the evidence. They will decide if Trump's guilty or not. All of this brew-haha is just getting your blood pressure up. Relax. You have no say, and you can't control what the jury does.

---

No, he IS innocent until PROVEN guilty.

Opalka said:

---

Man, reading through this entire thread is like being in the audience of the Jerry Springer Show. So much innuendo, "what if's", presumptions, conspiracy theories and downright false information. "This person's second cousin, once sat next to Bragg's dog's vet's assistant". Good Lord. Worried that Trump won't get a fair trial?....most of you have him already found innocent before any evidence has been presented!

It's really simple. There will be a jury, and they will get to see and hear the evidence. They will decide if Trump's guilty or not. All of this brew-haha is just getting your blood pressure up. Relax. You have no say, and you can't control what the jury does.

---

Pelosi, is that you, glad to have you here on TexAgs!

So conspiracy to cover up a crime but Bragg cannot identify which crime was being covered up? That is even more stupid than some of the stuff Mueller invented.

Opalka said:

---

Man, reading through this entire thread is like being in the audience of the Jerry Springer Show. So much innuendo, "what if's", presumptions, conspiracy theories and downright false information. "This person's second cousin, once sat next to Bragg's dog's vet's assistant". Good Lord. Worried that Trump won't get a fair trial?....most of you have him already found innocent before any evidence has been presented!

It's really simple. There will be a jury, and they will get to see and hear the evidence. They will decide if Trump's guilty or not. All of this brew-haha is just getting your blood pressure up. Relax. You have no say, and you can't control what the jury does.

---

Isn't he innocent until proven guility?

aginlakeway said:

---

Opalka said:

---

Man, reading through this entire thread is like being in the audience of the Jerry Springer Show. So much innuendo, "what if's", presumptions, conspiracy theories and downright false information. "This person's second cousin, once sat next to Bragg's dog's vet's assistant". Good Lord. Worried that Trump won't get a fair trial?....most of you have him already found innocent before any evidence has been presented!

It's really simple. There will be a jury, and they will get to see and hear the evidence. They will decide if Trump's guilty or not. All of this brew-haha is just getting your blood pressure up. Relax. You have no say, and you can't control what the jury does.

---

Isn't he innocent until proven guility?

---

Yep.

And this is cognitive dissonance at its finest. You have a group of people who throw the presumption of innocence out the window because some mean tweets hurt their feelings. How are we expected to reasonably and rationally debate with these people?

Aggies2009 said:

---

Opalka said:

---

....most of you have him already found innocent before any evidence has been presented!

---

You realize that someone is innocent until PROVEN guilty, right?

And in the absence of proof (now), the only reasonable conclusion is that he's innocent.

---

Buddy, you're wasting your breath. This individual and the rest of his ilk do not understand the rule of law, the Constitution, or equal application of the law. Liberals are incapable of logic and reason so literally everything is reduced down to feelings and emotions. And because Trump upset Opalka's feelings, the natural recourse, in his mind, is jail time.

will25u said:

---

NY Statute of Limitations: cf: Other Felonies :: https://t.co/fI3EWxOAIE

— Zhuang Zhou’s Casual Sedition-if you know you know (@politicalwilli) April 4, 2023

---

Dude, these people are desperate to throw the presumption of innocence out the window. What makes you think they wouldn't do the same for the statute of limitations?

Opalka said:

---

Man, reading through this entire thread is like being in the audience of the Jerry Springer Show. So much innuendo, "what if's", presumptions, conspiracy theories and downright false information. "This person's second cousin, once sat next to Bragg's dog's vet's assistant". Good Lord. Worried that Trump won't get a fair trial?....most of you have him already found innocent before any evidence has been presented!

It's really simple. There will be a jury, and they will get to see and hear the evidence. They will decide if Trump's guilty or not. All of this brew-haha is just getting your blood pressure up. Relax. You have no say, and you can't control what the jury does.

---

People have Trump presumed innocent prior to the case and that's wrong? Tell me you do not understand the law, without telling me you do not understand the law

aggiehawg said:

---

So conspiracy to cover up a crime but Bragg cannot identify which crime was being covered up? That is even more stupid than some of the stuff Mueller invented.

---

Hawg, under lib justice you have to convict the criminal in order to find out the crime. Don't you remember how Pelosi and friends pass Obamacare and other bills? Same principle.

We just need to trust the process as Opalka suggested.

I don't think this should be analyzed like a typical criminal case, but should be looked at solely in terms of political considerations. If the first hearing on challenges to the merits isn't until December, any ruling, appeal, etc. puts you on the doorstep of the 2024 election and well into the primary. This was filed to affect the election, not to prosecute Trump with any meritorious charges.

Also, it appears the indictment is based on old evidence Bragg had at his disposal since he took office and the same evidence his predecessor used to consider charges. If that's correct, then why did he wait until now? In my opinion, it's to make this a campaign issue and no other reason.

Finally, there are still pending issues in Georgia and the classified documents case that will likely be piled on about the same time Trump gets the Republican nomination. Timing is likely not a coincidence and is probably all coordinated by Dem operatives.

jrdaustin said:

---

The Justice system is the entity on trial here, and THAT should concern you.

---

Its not even a proper charge under NY law, the statute of limitations has run out, and this now clearly violates right to a speedy trial as he has been indicted, arrested and formally charged without being told what the actual crime is.

Plain and simply unconstitutional and this should go straight to SCOTUS, tossed out and Bragg should be immediately removed from office.

Martial law should be imposed in NYC as their civilian courts are no longer effective.

will25u said:

---

Biden is giddy!

"Is the indictment of your predecessor politically divisive?"

BIDEN: *laughs* pic.twitter.com/YGDdBxE0iW

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) April 4, 2023

---

The fact that this corrupt piece of trash and his disgusting, criminal family are up there laughing at Trump while they skate free of ACTUAL crimes is just infuriating.