Ag with kids said:I don't disagree the Biden being weak as **** led Putin to believe that invading would not result in a harsh response.PlaneCrashGuy said:
Absolutely.
I was thinking of his "minor incursion" comment. Biden's poor leadership was a major contributor. I know that level of nuance doesn't sound as good as "100% Putin" internet platitudes but anyone looking at it honestly can see Biden's corruption and mistakes leading up to this.
But, that doesn't mean that Putin suddenly got the idea to invade BECAUSE Biden was weak. It was just a good opportunity to do what he was always intending to do.
It was still 100% Putin's fault for invading. If a bully beats up a little kid because the little kid is a weakling it doesn't mean the little kid is in any way at fault for getting beat up.
I'm pretty sure you're contradicting yourself here, but the inarticulate use of a double negative makes this hard to understand.
Think of it like a 3 legged stool. It takes means, motive, and opportunity. If you are admitting Biden gave Putin the opportunity, then you've blown apart the "100% platitude" that so many ignorantly spout off. The 100% Putin trope is problematic because it attempts to remove all nuance.