Russia is occupying Ukraine.

How will Ukraine push Russia out of Ukraine when Ukraine is shrinking everyday?

Teslag said:

---

Has Russia won a major battle since the initial invasion? Bakhmut was taken by a PMC that no longer exists, so that doesn't counts. 2 miles and adviika is nothing like Kharkiv and Kherson.

So anything?

---

Bahkmut, Crimeria, Advekia, Mariupol.

John Armfield said:

---

Teslag said:

---

Has Russia won a major battle since the initial invasion? Bakhmut was taken by a PMC that no longer exists, so that doesn't counts. 2 miles and adviika is nothing like Kharkiv and Kherson.

So anything?

---

Bahkmut, Crimeria, Advekia, Mariupol.

---

Bakhmut was a PMC, not Russia. And it no longer exists

Crimea was taken before the initial invasion.

Adviika was not a major battle.

Mariupol was taken in the initial invasion.


Wanna try again?

Teslag said:

---

John Armfield said:

---

Teslag said:

---

Has Russia won a major battle since the initial invasion? Bakhmut was taken by a PMC that no longer exists, so that doesn't counts. 2 miles and adviika is nothing like Kharkiv and Kherson.

So anything?

---

Bahkmut, Crimeria, Advekia, Mariupol.

---

Bakhmut was a PMC, not Russia. And it no longer exists

Crimea was taken before the initial invasion.

Adviika was not a major battle.

Mariupol was taken in the initial invasion.


Wanna try again?

---

Bakhmut is in Russian hands no?

Why did UKE fight so hard for Adviika all analyst said was a crucial loss?

Mariupol so they still lost

UKE is getting its ass destroyed thanks for playing

This is not a "pro-Russia" "pro-Putin" endorsement

Teslag said:

---

John Armfield said:

---

Teslag said:

---

Has Russia won a major battle since the initial invasion? Bakhmut was taken by a PMC that no longer exists, so that doesn't counts. 2 miles and adviika is nothing like Kharkiv and Kherson.

So anything?

---

Bahkmut, Crimeria, Advekia, Mariupol.

---

Bakhmut was a PMC, not Russia. And it no longer exists

Crimea was taken before the initial invasion.

Adviika was not a major battle.

Mariupol was taken in the initial invasion.


Wanna try again?

---

Uh newsflash, Bakhmut still exists and is a part of Russia now

Donghorn said:

---

This is not a "pro-Russia" "pro-Putin" endorsement

---

No. Because none of that happened.

PlaneCrashGuy said:

---

Teslag said:

---

John Armfield said:

---

Teslag said:

---

Has Russia won a major battle since the initial invasion? Bakhmut was taken by a PMC that no longer exists, so that doesn't counts. 2 miles and adviika is nothing like Kharkiv and Kherson.

So anything?

---

Bahkmut, Crimeria, Advekia, Mariupol.

---

Bakhmut was a PMC, not Russia. And it no longer exists

Crimea was taken before the initial invasion.

Adviika was not a major battle.

Mariupol was taken in the initial invasion.


Wanna try again?

---

Uh newsflash, Bakhmut still exists and is a part of Russia now

---

Bakhmut was taken by a PMC that no longer exists and their leader was killed by…




Russia

Teslag said:

---

PlaneCrashGuy said:

---

Teslag said:

---

John Armfield said:

---

Teslag said:

---

Has Russia won a major battle since the initial invasion? Bakhmut was taken by a PMC that no longer exists, so that doesn't counts. 2 miles and adviika is nothing like Kharkiv and Kherson.

So anything?

---

Bahkmut, Crimeria, Advekia, Mariupol.

---

Bakhmut was a PMC, not Russia. And it no longer exists

Crimea was taken before the initial invasion.

Adviika was not a major battle.

Mariupol was taken in the initial invasion.


Wanna try again?

---

Uh newsflash, Bakhmut still exists and is a part of Russia now

---

Bakhmut was taken by a PMC that no longer exists and their leader was killed by…




Russia

---

so when can we expect Ukraine to recapture it? You could tell us the month and year, don't need the exact day.

Teslag said:

---

Donghorn said:

---

This is not a "pro-Russia" "pro-Putin" endorsement

---

No. Because none of that happened.

---

Buddy forgot to read, but he just admitted Russia did not invade unprovoked. Quite the slip.

Gotta admit, I am starting to worry the next Trump impeachment attempt/fraud will revolve around ending this insane war;

⚡️Orban: Trump is 'man of peace.'

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban said that Trump's plans for an end to the war "are quite detailed" and align with Hungary's national interests.https://t.co/WcK1EupkJP

— The Kyiv Independent (@KyivIndependent) March 10, 2024

Donghorn said:

---

This is not a "pro-Russia" "pro-Putin" endorsement

---

I'll take "Things that are absolute bull****" for $1000, Alex.

PlaneCrashGuy said:

---

Teslag said:

---

John Armfield said:

---

Teslag said:

---

Has Russia won a major battle since the initial invasion? Bakhmut was taken by a PMC that no longer exists, so that doesn't counts. 2 miles and adviika is nothing like Kharkiv and Kherson.

So anything?

---

Bahkmut, Crimeria, Advekia, Mariupol.

---

Bakhmut was a PMC, not Russia. And it no longer exists

Crimea was taken before the initial invasion.

Adviika was not a major battle.

Mariupol was taken in the initial invasion.


Wanna try again?

---

Uh newsflash, Bakhmut still exists and is a part of Russia now

---

And Russia didn't win a major battle to take it because they weren't involved in the battle. They just came in afterwards.

Ag with kids said:

---

PlaneCrashGuy said:

---

Teslag said:

---

John Armfield said:

---

Teslag said:

---

Has Russia won a major battle since the initial invasion? Bakhmut was taken by a PMC that no longer exists, so that doesn't counts. 2 miles and adviika is nothing like Kharkiv and Kherson.

So anything?

---

Bahkmut, Crimeria, Advekia, Mariupol.

---

Bakhmut was a PMC, not Russia. And it no longer exists

Crimea was taken before the initial invasion.

Adviika was not a major battle.

Mariupol was taken in the initial invasion.


Wanna try again?

---

Uh newsflash, Bakhmut still exists and is a part of Russia now

---

And Russia didn't win a major battle to take it because they weren't involved in the battle. They just came in afterwards.

---

This is a hilarious take PMC was acting on behalf of Russia you guys are arguing semantics and chalking it up as some sort of moral victory.

John Armfield said:

---

Ag with kids said:

---

PlaneCrashGuy said:

---

Teslag said:

---

John Armfield said:

---

Teslag said:

---

Has Russia won a major battle since the initial invasion? Bakhmut was taken by a PMC that no longer exists, so that doesn't counts. 2 miles and adviika is nothing like Kharkiv and Kherson.

So anything?

---

Bahkmut, Crimeria, Advekia, Mariupol.

---

Bakhmut was a PMC, not Russia. And it no longer exists

Crimea was taken before the initial invasion.

Adviika was not a major battle.

Mariupol was taken in the initial invasion.


Wanna try again?

---

Uh newsflash, Bakhmut still exists and is a part of Russia now

---

And Russia didn't win a major battle to take it because they weren't involved in the battle. They just came in afterwards.

---

This is a hilarious take PMC was acting on behalf of Russia you guys are arguing semantics and chalking it up as some sort of moral victory.

---

The PMC that did that doesn't exist anymore. And it wasn't RUSSIA that did it. In fact, the PMC was actually more effective than the Russians...

John Armfield said:

---

Ag with kids said:

---

PlaneCrashGuy said:

---

Teslag said:

---

John Armfield said:

---

Teslag said:

---

Has Russia won a major battle since the initial invasion? Bakhmut was taken by a PMC that no longer exists, so that doesn't counts. 2 miles and adviika is nothing like Kharkiv and Kherson.

So anything?

---

Bahkmut, Crimeria, Advekia, Mariupol.

---

Bakhmut was a PMC, not Russia. And it no longer exists

Crimea was taken before the initial invasion.

Adviika was not a major battle.

Mariupol was taken in the initial invasion.


Wanna try again?

---

Uh newsflash, Bakhmut still exists and is a part of Russia now

---

And Russia didn't win a major battle to take it because they weren't involved in the battle. They just came in afterwards.

---

This is a hilarious take PMC was acting on behalf of Russia you guys are arguing semantics and chalking it up as some sort of moral victory.

---

Just let them cope, no matter how pathetic. You know it. I know it. They know it.

"Putin is solely responsible for every death*"

*Bakhmut not included. That was a PMC.

PlaneCrashGuy said:

---

"Putin is solely responsible for every death*"

*Bakhmut not included. That was a PMC.

---

The same Putin the emphatically stated over and over again during the past decade that Wagner is in no way affiliated at all with Russia? That Putin?

Teslag said:

---

PlaneCrashGuy said:

---

"Putin is solely responsible for every death*"

*Bakhmut not included. That was a PMC.

---

The same Putin the emphatically stated over and over again during the past decade that Wagner is in no way affiliated at all with Russia? That Putin?

---

Is Putin responsible for every death or every death except Wagner kills? You need to pick one and stop contradicting yourself.

British mercenary Harry Gregg hanged himself after returning home from Ukraine

He was inspired to fight Russia by former UK Prime Minister Liz Truss pic.twitter.com/v5XuvjT8qz

— What the media hides. (@narrative_hole) March 10, 2024

John Armfield said:

---

Teslag said:

---

Has Russia won a major battle since the initial invasion? Bakhmut was taken by a PMC that no longer exists, so that doesn't counts. 2 miles and adviika is nothing like Kharkiv and Kherson.

So anything?

---

Bahkmut, Crimeria, Advekia, Mariupol.

---

I forgot about the battles for Crimeria and Advekia. You seem well informed.

2 good speculative posts;

ANALYSIS HOW WILL THE WAR END, MARCH 11 2024
Part 2/2

A resounding Russian defeat of Ukrainian will have resounding consequences. It doesn't matter if it takes two or five to six years. What will happen to Ukraine?
One thing is sure, the entire Ukraine will not disappear and… pic.twitter.com/ku8wk6qN2g

— Mikael Valtersson (@MikaelValterss1) March 11, 2024

🇭🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇷🇺🚨‼️ If Trump comes to power again, “will not give a penny” to Ukraine.

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban said this after a meeting with Trump in the United States.

“If the Americans don’t give weapons and money, and the Europeans follow them, then the conflict (in… pic.twitter.com/FbW1mPyocH

— Lord Bebo (@MyLordBebo) March 11, 2024

Opposition party leaders in France, from Right to Left-wing, all seem to agree that Macron is disturbingly serious about sending ground forces into Ukraine pic.twitter.com/BRtLmz6ETE

— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) March 10, 2024

NEW: President Biden has now deployed US troops to Haiti. The US has troops in Gaza, Ukraine, Syria, Jordan, and Iraq... Which countries am I missing? https://t.co/m5q2BR6k6J

— @amuse (@amuse) March 10, 2024

Will Trump not be briefed on Ukraine now or will it just be another setup for a faux impeachment scam?

With the new party line consolidating behind Brennan’s leak, we can see that Big Intel is setting up something nasty for this presidential election. https://t.co/mw8udJ0e2c

— J Michael Waller (@JMichaelWaller) March 11, 2024

Another explanation/take as to how the sanctions/war have benefited Russia (particularly their oligarchs/ruling class, aka Biden familia paymasters):

Link to the video on YouTube: https://t.co/12zbCUsbxf

— Arnaud Bertrand (@RnaudBertrand) March 11, 2024

These men have families who love them. Sacrificing them for a PR stunt, a failed one at that, is reprehensible.

— Anatomy of Truth 🇨🇦 (@e_l_g_c_a) March 10, 2024

Good question. Couple theories others have posited:

1. Russian MOD is just now releasing saved up footage from the past year for whatever reason (perhaps to up the propaganda pressure on crumbling AFU)

2. AFU is getting desperate because their lines are breaking on every front,… https://t.co/U0fHf4bvns

— SIMPLICIUS Ѱ (@simpatico771) March 10, 2024

Quote:

---

US President Joe Biden's recent blunder in which he mixed up Ukraine and the Middle East sums up his poor mental state, former Russian leader Dmitry Medvedev has claimed.

Biden's gaffe came in an interview with MSNBC on Saturday, as he discussed the Israeli military campaign in Gaza with host Jonathan Capehart. The US leader said West Jerusalem should not repeat the mistakes that Washington made following the September 2001 terrorist attacks.

"America made a mistake. We went after Osama bin Laden until we got him, but we shouldn't have gone into Ukraine," Biden stated. He then corrected himself, saying he meant "the whole thing in Iraq and Afghanistan," referring to the US invasions and occupation of the two Middle Eastern nations. Confusing places and people has been a recurring issue for the 81-year-old president.

Medvedev, who serves as deputy chair of the Russian Security Council, posted a short clip of the gaffe on Sunday on social media, adding: "A rare kind of idiot."

'We shouldn't have gone into Ukraine' Biden
[url=https://www.rt.com/news/594019-biden-ukraine-iraq-israel/][/url]
Some Russian officials have suggested that Biden's slip of the tongue was Freudian.
"He didn't mix it up. He can no longer keep to himself what everyone understands the US has disgraced itself in the bloodiest manner with the whole Ukrainian project," Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said.

Moscow perceives the Ukraine conflict as a US-led proxy war against Russia, in which Ukrainian soldiers serve as 'cannon fodder'. The Russian military estimated that by the end of February, Kiev's military losses had reached 444,000.

In the nine-minute interview with MSNBC, Biden mentioned Ukraine once, calling out former President Donald Trump for his skeptical attitude towards NATO. The incumbent leader described the organization as "critical to our national defense." Moscow has cited the expansion of the military bloc in Europe as a key cause of the hostilities with Ukraine.

---

Absolutely right. Forever proxy war, comrades!

Quote:

---

Venture capitalist David Sacks said Sunday on the Breaking Points podcast that President Joe Biden's "big backfire" is Ukraine.

Sacks said, "The whole mainstream media stampeding us into this policy and um the sort of the taboo they're trying to create around it where you know, it's a lot like the Iraq War where anyone who opposed it was considered unpatriotic or sort of treasonous."

He continued, "I guess I wouldn't speak out as much about it if I thought that the issue was being covered accurately and it is such an important issue. This could lead to World War III or what I call Woke War III if we're not careful."

He added, "I call this Biden's big backfire. If you look at all of his claims at the beginning of the war, they've all come true in reverse. He said that we would weaken Russia in order to prevent them from waging uh this type of War again. In fact, we've made the Russian military stronger it's larger than it was before. It's produced, uh, far more weapons the industrial base is ramped up, plus it's now a battle-tested battle-harden, especially against Western weapons. It's a much more formidable military Biden has created on the part of the Russians than when we started.

Meanwhile, it's the United States that has seen its stockpiles depleted and hollowed out. Then you look at the economic claims that Biden made, he said that sanctions would crush the Russian economy. In fact, the Russian economy is growing faster than any of the G7 economies."

---

I’m an American. Ukraine is not our war. And if we had stayed out of it, there would have been no war.

— David Sacks (@DavidSacks) March 10, 2024

nortex97 said:

---

Quote:

---

Venture capitalist David Sacks said Sunday on the Breaking Points podcast that President Joe Biden's "big backfire" is Ukraine.

Sacks said, "The whole mainstream media stampeding us into this policy and um the sort of the taboo they're trying to create around it where you know, it's a lot like the Iraq War where anyone who opposed it was considered unpatriotic or sort of treasonous."

He continued, "I guess I wouldn't speak out as much about it if I thought that the issue was being covered accurately and it is such an important issue. This could lead to World War III or what I call Woke War III if we're not careful."

He added, "I call this Biden's big backfire. If you look at all of his claims at the beginning of the war, they've all come true in reverse. He said that we would weaken Russia in order to prevent them from waging uh this type of War again. In fact, we've made the Russian military stronger it's larger than it was before. It's produced, uh, far more weapons the industrial base is ramped up, plus it's now a battle-tested battle-harden, especially against Western weapons. It's a much more formidable military Biden has created on the part of the Russians than when we started.

Meanwhile, it's the United States that has seen its stockpiles depleted and hollowed out. Then you look at the economic claims that Biden made, he said that sanctions would crush the Russian economy. In fact, the Russian economy is growing faster than any of the G7 economies."

---

I’m an American. Ukraine is not our war. And if we had stayed out of it, there would have been no war.

— David Sacks (@DavidSacks) March 10, 2024

---

but but wE GeT tO sTACK RuSSIan BoDIES

nortex97 said:

---

Quote:

---

Venture capitalist David Sacks said Sunday on the Breaking Points podcast that President Joe Biden's "big backfire" is Ukraine.

Sacks said, "The whole mainstream media stampeding us into this policy and um the sort of the taboo they're trying to create around it where you know, it's a lot like the Iraq War where anyone who opposed it was considered unpatriotic or sort of treasonous."

He continued, "I guess I wouldn't speak out as much about it if I thought that the issue was being covered accurately and it is such an important issue. This could lead to World War III or what I call Woke War III if we're not careful."

He added, "I call this Biden's big backfire. If you look at all of his claims at the beginning of the war, they've all come true in reverse. He said that we would weaken Russia in order to prevent them from waging uh this type of War again. In fact, we've made the Russian military stronger it's larger than it was before. It's produced, uh, far more weapons the industrial base is ramped up, plus it's now a battle-tested battle-harden, especially against Western weapons. It's a much more formidable military Biden has created on the part of the Russians than when we started.

Meanwhile, it's the United States that has seen its stockpiles depleted and hollowed out. Then you look at the economic claims that Biden made, he said that sanctions would crush the Russian economy. In fact, the Russian economy is growing faster than any of the G7 economies."

---

I’m an American. Ukraine is not our war. And if we had stayed out of it, there would have been no war.

— David Sacks (@DavidSacks) March 10, 2024

---

Well, if a venture capitalist says all that stuff, it must be true...

Russia is way stronger. They have twice the army and all of it is top of the line soldiers now.

They just had to kill off those useless soldiers and get rid of their old materiel so that they could finally start using their new stuff...which they will bring out anytime now.

Admittedly David sacks is no Texags expert.

I can just imagine Putin and his top generals sitting around in 2021 deciding how to make their country stronger. And then one them says "hey let's invade Ukraine and lose most of our front line units, most of our best weapons and tank crews, our fleet flagship, and then get stuck in a multi year quagmire"


And then in unison they all triumphantly agreed.

nortex97 said:

---

Admittedly David sacks is no Texags expert.

---

David Sacks knows just as much as Texags experts about what's actually happening over there (aka basically nothing). He just thinks he knows a lot more.

Why do y'all seem to be so excited about Ukraine losing? There's no scenario where them losing is in our best interests long-term.

Teslag said:

---

I can just imagine Putin and his top generals sitting around in 2021 deciding how to make their country stronger. And then one them says "hey let's invade Ukraine and lose most of our front line units, most of our best weapons and tank crews, our fleet flagship, and then get stuck in a multi year quagmire"


And then in unison they all triumphantly agreed.

---

wtmartinaggie said:

---

Why do y'all seem to be so excited about Ukraine losing? There's no scenario where them losing is in our best interests long-term.

---

Shhh. War mongers, I mean Russophiles, I mean "another perspective" people know that Russia winning is in our best interests

GAC06 said:

---

wtmartinaggie said:

---

Why do y'all seem to be so excited about Ukraine losing? There's no scenario where them losing is in our best interests long-term.

---

Shhh. War mongers, I mean Russophiles, I mean "another perspective" people know that Russia winning is in our best interests

---

Our best interest staying the fk out of it to begin with.

Ukraine is a steaming pile of foreign policy feces because western leaders used Ukraine for bribes, ignoring the corruption and human trafficking, or being complacent in both.

wtmartinaggie said:

---

Why do y'all seem to be so excited about Ukraine losing? There's no scenario where them losing is in our best interests long-term.

---

I am not 'excited' at all about the proxy war continuing. I am pretty disgusted by the blue and yellow flag social media types, excitement for Ukraine 'winning' (which is all just propaganda), and our role in provoking the conflict, as well as plans to dump a trillion plus dollars there into their coffers (via blackrock etc) as some sort of modern 'marshal plan' as though we have any vested interest in such a horrific waste. So, yes, Russia winning would have a very real cost savings for Americans, imho.

The war has triggered massive inflation/recession in Europe, cost hundreds of thousands of lives on both sides, and is used to hide graft and corruption involving our political leadership for over a decade. Happy to clarify my views, thx for asking. What is an absurdity is thinking we are 'helping' the Ukrainians in 'their' war against Russia, as though they didn't originally elect Zelensky on a peace and anti-corruption platform;

In 2023 a woman from #Kharkov made a video of one of the city's military cemeteries a year later she returned and found that it had grown exponentially. #Zelensky's claim of only 31K military losses easy to dispell. But how many more don't have a grave?#Ukraine pic.twitter.com/EsVdEIgmIj

— Arthur Morgan (@ArthurM40330824) March 12, 2024

🇩🇪🇺🇦🚨‼️ Scholz excludes the direct and indirect use of Taurus missiles!

He says German soldiers are needed to control the targeting, so that Ukraine doesn’t hit something that they’re not supposed to.

So basically he doesn’t trust Ukraine. pic.twitter.com/fZ0vCsATZq

— Lord Bebo (@MyLordBebo) March 12, 2024

It continues to amaze me that Euro-NATO country after Euro-NATO country has committed themselves into a financial black hole throwing money at Ukraine.

Are they expecting Uncle Sugar to bail them out? They do realize the US sees NATO as a way to save money on defense, right? https://t.co/V2i32gJOWo

— Armchair Warlord (@ArmchairW) March 12, 2024

You want to know the state of war planning in the US?

The most senior defense and intelligence officials in the Biden Administration are stating - at least publicly - that they can magic ammunition out of the supply chain with enough money.

They cannot and this has been proven. https://t.co/h9Q2SELq1t

— Armchair Warlord (@ArmchairW) March 12, 2024

Even comments about negotiating for a peace from the pope have been slandered as fearful surrender talk;

In case anyone missed the point: European colleagues point out that the Pope has legitimized the idea of a negotiated settlement. The Atlanticists are trying to neutralize his impact by falsely alleging that he called for Ukraine to surrender. But the transcript of his remarks… https://t.co/qaa40dnpxS

— David P. Goldman (@davidpgoldman) March 11, 2024

You'll notice in this thread alone when a commenter makes too many points he/she will be derided as 'ignorant' or 'he doesn't know anything' in vague terms because dissent is not something many are open to, and they can't rebut any of the actual points, which often are those I've been linking to/pointing out for months or over a year;

UPDATE: CNN catching up. pic.twitter.com/wECqFmndAA

— David Sacks (@DavidSacks) March 12, 2024

One man's 'freedom fighter' is another man's…

❗️🇺🇦🇷🇺 Odessa underground partisans speak out:

❗️"WE are Ukrainians living in the hero city of Odessa. Today we announce that the Third Front has been formed and is ready to fight for independence. We intend to avenge the murder in the House of Trade Unions, for 10 years of… pic.twitter.com/HFx52z5P7S

— SIMPLICIUS Ѱ (@simpatico771) March 11, 2024

🫤 They thought the French were going to fight for them… the French.

That’s how bad the situation is. pic.twitter.com/3OcrPGQe2Y

— ayden (@squatsons) March 11, 2024

And none of it would have happened it Putin didn't decide to invade a sovereign nation in a pure land grab.