2200 year old Gazintap Castle destroyed:
Before:
After:
Before:
After:
Theres only a handful of places dumb enough to build big cities in the path of volcanos...you know places like Tacoma, WA.Brittmoore Car Club said:True, I guess in modern times we just see more cases of Earthquakes seriously jacking up major cities. Footage of molten lava flowing and raining down upon a city causing massive devastation would be absolutely horrific.aezmvp said:Then you haven't lived near a real volcano. Earthquakes are scary but literal mountain blowing up raining flaming meteors, clouds of ash and gas hot enough to burn you alive and rivers of molten rock... woof.Brittmoore Car Club said:
Geez how do you trust any remaining buildings within the general vicinity going fwd? Can't imagine how many homes and buildings are structurally unsound at this point. Earthquakes are the scariest and most "apocalyptic" feeling natural disaster imo.
aezmvp said:
Netflix. Good documentary. Good reminder that some of those parts of mother nature are amazing but dangerous.
aezmvp said:Then you haven't lived near a real volcano. Earthquakes are scary but literal mountain blowing up raining flaming meteors, clouds of ash and gas hot enough to burn you alive and rivers of molten rock... woof.Brittmoore Car Club said:
Geez how do you trust any remaining buildings within the general vicinity going fwd? Can't imagine how many homes and buildings are structurally unsound at this point. Earthquakes are the scariest and most "apocalyptic" feeling natural disaster imo.
Aggie95 said:
the videos and thoughts of massive earthquakes in poorly developed countries is just overwhelming to me...
the magnitude of human loss and suffering
where do you even start with SAR?
how do you remove and dispose of all that ruble?
even if money was available to help...do you send it to that region, knowing it would/could get into the wrong hands.
earthquakes ,probably more than any other natural disaster, get "the end of the world is near" vibes
MuchosPollos said:FbgTxAg said:
In before 40 Trillion in taxpayer money to Turkey.
We don't have to shoulder the burden that much but if there's ever a time we should be sending aid this is it.
These scenes are horrific.
bmks270 said:
I think it will be way more than 10,000
I think that's the biggest on record in the U.S. That one was actually offshore, IIRC, but the tsunami was brutal.AggiePops said:Alaska, 1964, was a 9.2. I worked with a guy who was a school kid up there during that.Smeghead4761 said:
I grew up in California, and even in a rich, industrialized country where earthquakes are common and planned for, like the U.S. West Coast or Japan, a 7.8 is big. Very big.
The Loma Prieta quake (the 1989 World Series earthquake, for those that remember) was a 6.9. The Northridge quake in 1994 was 6.7.
Since the Richter Scale is logarithmic (each whole number increase on the scale is 10x increase in magnitude), this quake is about 9x as powerful as Loma Prieta.
Even somewhere like California or Japan, with long established and well enforced building codes, the effects would be brutal. In a less wealthy country like Turkey, a big quake like that will be devastating.
schmellba99 said:Aggie95 said:
the videos and thoughts of massive earthquakes in poorly developed countries is just overwhelming to me...
the magnitude of human loss and suffering
where do you even start with SAR?
how do you remove and dispose of all that ruble?
even if money was available to help...do you send it to that region, knowing it would/could get into the wrong hands.
earthquakes ,probably more than any other natural disaster, get "the end of the world is near" vibes
Hatians are still waiting on their aid from the Clinton foundation....
Sooner or later there will be a ~M 7.5 #earthquake in this region (South-Central Turkey, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon). #deprem pic.twitter.com/6CcSnjJmCV
— Frank Hoogerbeets (@hogrbe) February 3, 2023
Amazing. Unfortunately it was sooner.JoCoAg09 said:Sooner or later there will be a ~M 7.5 #earthquake in this region (South-Central Turkey, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon). #deprem pic.twitter.com/6CcSnjJmCV
— Frank Hoogerbeets (@hogrbe) February 3, 2023
bmks270 said:
I think it will be way more than 10,000
2ndGen87 said:
I think the Richter scale is absolutely terrible. Humans don't think logarithmically.
It would be so much easier if someone said,
oh this earthquake was a 2, no this one was a 7, wait this one was a 500. You would instantly get the difference,
What's a 7.2 vs a 7.5? Mathematically it seems the same, but reality is way different.
That's pretty crazy, if real.JoCoAg09 said:Sooner or later there will be a ~M 7.5 #earthquake in this region (South-Central Turkey, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon). #deprem pic.twitter.com/6CcSnjJmCV
— Frank Hoogerbeets (@hogrbe) February 3, 2023
2ndGen87 said:
I think the Richter scale is absolutely terrible. Humans don't think logarithmically.
It would be so much easier if someone said,
oh this earthquake was a 2, no this one was a 7, wait this one was a 500. You would instantly get the difference,
What's a 7.2 vs a 7.5? Mathematically it seems the same, but reality is way different.
Reports saying no major damage or injuries. Good thing since the USA has 50 B61 nuclear missiles thereGAC06 said:
I wonder if Incirlik was affected
Not many folks know about the Cascadia subduction zone. When that thing goes, no one in the entire state of Washington or Oregon will be interested in the color or gender of their fellow citizens. The quake would be bad enough, but the tsunami would finish off Seattle for a couple of years.Smeghead4761 said:I think that's the biggest on record in the U.S. That one was actually offshore, IIRC, but the tsunami was brutal.AggiePops said:Alaska, 1964, was a 9.2. I worked with a guy who was a school kid up there during that.Smeghead4761 said:
I grew up in California, and even in a rich, industrialized country where earthquakes are common and planned for, like the U.S. West Coast or Japan, a 7.8 is big. Very big.
The Loma Prieta quake (the 1989 World Series earthquake, for those that remember) was a 6.9. The Northridge quake in 1994 was 6.7.
Since the Richter Scale is logarithmic (each whole number increase on the scale is 10x increase in magnitude), this quake is about 9x as powerful as Loma Prieta.
Even somewhere like California or Japan, with long established and well enforced building codes, the effects would be brutal. In a less wealthy country like Turkey, a big quake like that will be devastating.
Luckily, Alaska wasn't very densely populated. My last tour at Ft Lewis, WA, I participated in a tabletop exercise centered on a major quake (8-9.0) on the Cascadia Subduction Zone, which runs offshore from about Eureka, CA, to Vancouver Island. Quite a bit of development in the tsunami zone there, although luckily Seattle/Tacoma and Portland are sheltered a good bit.
The truly scary part is that the historical period between major quakes on the CSZ is 200-500 years.
It's been 323 years since the last one, confirmed by tsunami records in Japan.
If memory serves, the CSZ was the focus of the pilot episode of the series "Megadisasters."
Example: Our national debtMouthBQ98 said:
Human beings are regularly devastated by the inability to grasp the implications of exponential functions.
fasthorse05 said:Not many folks know about the Cascadia subduction zone. When that thing goes, no one in the entire state of Washington or Oregon will be interested in the color or gender of their fellow citizens. The quake would be bad enough, but the tsunami would finish off Seattle for a couple of years.Smeghead4761 said:I think that's the biggest on record in the U.S. That one was actually offshore, IIRC, but the tsunami was brutal.AggiePops said:Alaska, 1964, was a 9.2. I worked with a guy who was a school kid up there during that.Smeghead4761 said:
I grew up in California, and even in a rich, industrialized country where earthquakes are common and planned for, like the U.S. West Coast or Japan, a 7.8 is big. Very big.
The Loma Prieta quake (the 1989 World Series earthquake, for those that remember) was a 6.9. The Northridge quake in 1994 was 6.7.
Since the Richter Scale is logarithmic (each whole number increase on the scale is 10x increase in magnitude), this quake is about 9x as powerful as Loma Prieta.
Even somewhere like California or Japan, with long established and well enforced building codes, the effects would be brutal. In a less wealthy country like Turkey, a big quake like that will be devastating.
Luckily, Alaska wasn't very densely populated. My last tour at Ft Lewis, WA, I participated in a tabletop exercise centered on a major quake (8-9.0) on the Cascadia Subduction Zone, which runs offshore from about Eureka, CA, to Vancouver Island. Quite a bit of development in the tsunami zone there, although luckily Seattle/Tacoma and Portland are sheltered a good bit.
The truly scary part is that the historical period between major quakes on the CSZ is 200-500 years.
It's been 323 years since the last one, confirmed by tsunami records in Japan.
If memory serves, the CSZ was the focus of the pilot episode of the series "Megadisasters."