MouthBQ98 said:
Need hard evidence, not just conjecture from improbable polling results.
Not even that improbable. Just unwilling to admit it.MouthBQ98 said:
Need hard evidence, not just conjecture from improbable polling results.
Secretary of State Kemp did the same when he ran against Abrams the first time, not this election. Of course Abrams complained about cheating then too.McKinney Ag69 said:You're telling me a clown like Hobbs won over Kari Lake who is polished and had a great platform legitimately?MouthBQ98 said:
Need hard evidence, not just conjecture from improbable polling results.
Hobbs oversaw the election process instead of recusing herself. I can't think of a bigger conflict of interest.
I wish AZ had a better Republican candidate for governor, but she was tainted. She could have won had she toned down the crazy. I guess I hadn't see proof of wide spread fraud in that election but I'm sure the "charts and graphs" will be posted soon enough. And, does anyone on F16 really believe they'll change someone else's mind? If anyone is under that false impression then they won't have fun playing 'F16 discussion board".McKinney Ag69 said:
So people can commit election fraud (AZ and NV) which is a felony but if you accuse them of it, you are an outcast and a pariah and you go to jail. This is not a free republic anymore. Change my mind.
I hope you're happy resident libs.
Time magazine admitted to it in 2020MouthBQ98 said:
Need hard evidence, not just conjecture from improbable polling results.
DeSantis won in Florida hammering away at the media and fringe Dem policies just like Lake did. Is he crazy? Or do you just reserve those labels for outspoken females that aren't left of center?BluHorseShu said:
She could have won had she toned down the crazy.
GeorgiAg said:Secretary of State Kemp did the same when he ran against Abrams the first time, not this election. Of course Abrams complained about cheating then too.McKinney Ag69 said:You're telling me a clown like Hobbs won over Kari Lake who is polished and had a great platform legitimately?MouthBQ98 said:
Need hard evidence, not just conjecture from improbable polling results.
Hobbs oversaw the election process instead of recusing herself. I can't think of a bigger conflict of interest.
Also, great platform? You mean the "I love Trump and the elections are a fraud" platform? That was a loser nation-wide.
oh no said:
cheating for communism under the guise of "saving our democracy" is called "fortifying". TIME Magazine said so.
anyone with serous doubts about a system full of control gaps and loopholes and zero transparency and accountability that thinks they deserve a better process if they can't get answers, is an extremist/domestic terrorist/racist/fascist.
unmade bed said:GeorgiAg said:Secretary of State Kemp did the same when he ran against Abrams the first time, not this election. Of course Abrams complained about cheating then too.McKinney Ag69 said:You're telling me a clown like Hobbs won over Kari Lake who is polished and had a great platform legitimately?MouthBQ98 said:
Need hard evidence, not just conjecture from improbable polling results.
Hobbs oversaw the election process instead of recusing herself. I can't think of a bigger conflict of interest.
Also, great platform? You mean the "I love Trump and the elections are a fraud" platform? That was a loser nation-wide.
Yep. Abrams lost the first time and cried "cheating." Then she ran again and lost and event worse. It's almost as if crying cheating after election losses turns off all but your "true believer" types. Good luck winning elections (either side) with only your true believer votes.
we don't have the at home electioneering and mail in harvesting opportunities that communists do in the big cities.Lake08 said:
So tired of these pointless threads about cheating. If you ain't cheating, you ain't trying. Either cheat right back or stfu.
no more candidate excuses when Dems can place brain damaged and senile candidates in offices.Ag CPA said:
Quit running unelectable MAGA candidates in purple states.
Fetterman v. Oz? Prime example of a hand selected Trump candidate losing an election any "establishment" R would have won easily.oh no said:no more candidate excuses when Dems can place brain damaged and senile candidates in offices.Ag CPA said:
Quit running unelectable MAGA candidates in purple states.
PA was a republican layup until trump pushed oz throughoh no said:no more candidate excuses when Dems can place brain damaged and senile candidates in offices.Ag CPA said:
Quit running unelectable MAGA candidates in purple states.
This is the equivalent of misquoting Trump on the "very fine people on both sides" speech. Sounds good in the abstract but it's not what he meant.Detmersdislocatedshoulder said:
does joe biden saying they have the greatest voter fraud apparatus in american history count as evidence?
Bocephus said:Is an 80 percent win rate not evidence?MouthBQ98 said:
Need hard evidence, not just conjecture from improbable polling results.
This, we need to focus on how shady it is. "Fraud" falls on deaf ears if you can't prove it. In fact, the left...masters of PR(opaganda)...have weaponized this against us. Coining the term "election denier" and basically painting people as stupid flat earthers in the mind of the left and the overall uninformed general populace.Zarathustra said:
First of all, don't say election fraud unless you can prove election fraud.
Stick to what you can prove. The vote counting process is not transparent and not credible. It would never pass any real world audit test.
Abraham Lincoln was wrong.
— Shukri Abdirahman (@ShuForCongress) November 15, 2022
The ballot is NOT stronger than the bullet.
We need a revolution not another rigged election.
Don't kid yourselves, we'll never have secure elections again. Ever.
