BuddysBud said:

---

oh no said:

---

Ag CPA said:

---

Quit running unelectable MAGA candidates in purple states.

---

no more candidate excuses when Dems can place brain damaged and senile candidates in offices.

---

Democrats even elected a dead guy.
Bad candidates don't matter if you control who counts the votes.

---

GOP would have done the same.

McKinney Ag69 said:

---

So people can commit election fraud (AZ and NV) which is a felony but if you accuse them of it, you are an outcast and a pariah and you go to jail. This is not a free republic anymore. Change my mind.

I hope you're happy resident libs.

---

People are slowly waking up to the fact they aren't in America anymore

Fitch said:

---

Tired of baseless claims of fraud.

That is all.

---

I'm tired of people calling it baseless, when its obvious.

unmade bed said:

---

Tom Kazansky 2012 said:

---

boboguitar said:

---

Republican clowns election fraud workflow:

Did we lose?

If yes, fraud.

If no, democrats didn't focus on cheating on that race and it was a completely fair election.

---

Republicans polled 4 to 1 in Maricopa county on election day in exit polling.

Still counting votes from election day a week later and they break 70% to the democrat just in time to win by 20k votes in a state with 2,500,000 voters.

Dems know it is fraud and are lashing out that their political castle is built on a foundation of sand.

You and your ideology are nothing without lying, cheating, and subverting the will of the people.

---

Hobbs and Kelly were both ahead in Arizona on Election Day. The votes that were counted after Election Day narrowed the races but not enough

---

Some of the batches broke 70% for Hobbs. They didn't break Republican from what they got on Election Day. It doesn't add up unless votes made their way into the count overwhelmingly from people who weren't exit polled. The statistical anomaly that would take is impossible to fathom.

At this point there are basically two choices in my view. Either secede or learn what the dems are doing and do it better than they do.

Gigem314 said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

She could have won had she toned down the crazy.

---

DeSantis won in Florida hammering away at the media and fringe Dem policies just like Lake did. Is he crazy? Or do you just reserve those labels for outspoken females that aren't left of center?

---

Desantis had a better more professional approach conducive to the office he sought. I reserve those labels for out spoken females in general, left or right

TxAgPreacher said:

---

Fitch said:

---

Tired of baseless claims of fraud.

That is all.

---

I'm tired of people calling it baseless, when it's obvious.

---

Prove it.

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

Fitch said:

---

Tired of baseless claims of fraud.

That is all.

---

I'm tired of people calling it baseless, when it's obvious.

---

Prove it.

---

**** that. You want faith in elections? Let's see some
Transparency. You have none.

MouthBQ98 said:

---

Need hard evidence, not just conjecture from improbable polling results.

---

Then let's do an audit - a full, open and no BS audit.

If the results are legit, they are legit and everybody is happy. Yet when the R's request said audit, the libs throw a temper tantrum and tell us that we need to just accept the results and trust they are accurate.

Yeah, no red flags there.

Do a full audit. Count each paper ballot. Doesn't matter at this point if it takes 2 weeks - AZ has already F'd up the system, another couple of weeks won't make a difference.

schmellba99 said:

---

MouthBQ98 said:

---

Need hard evidence, not just conjecture from improbable polling results.

---

Then let's do an audit - a full, open and no BS audit.

If the results are legit, they are legit and everybody is happy. Yet when the R's request said audit, the libs throw a temper tantrum and tell us that we need to just accept the results and trust they are accurate.

Yeah, no red flags there.

Do a full audit. Count each paper ballot. Doesn't matter at this point if it takes 2 weeks - AZ has already F'd up the system, another couple of weeks won't make a difference.

---

Audit won't work unless we clean up voter rolls and stop the ability to mail in ballots on a whim.

All an audit would tell us is that someone is registered and voted. It wouldn't include finding out if people actually willfully voted.

Fitch said:

---

Tired of baseless claims of fraud.

That is all.

---

Joe Biden disagrees with you.

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

Fitch said:

---

Tired of baseless claims of fraud.

That is all.

---

I'm tired of people calling it baseless, when it's obvious.

---

Prove it.

---

You're telling me nothing is fishy when the republicans won the popular vote by millions (something that rarely happens), and then they just so happened to underperform in swing districts AGAIN. When they slow roll the votes there will always be suspicion of fraud. No excuse for that. All the other districts just reported immediately. Only the key races took forever to get results... suuuuuurrrrreeeeeee.

There is no excuse for the lack of transparency. Calling it baseless is dismissive of the obvious irregularities. Of course I don't personally have connections or documents with the proof. When there is smoke there is fire, and there is a lot of smoke. Anyone saying otherwise is a liar.

You can't pee on me, and tell me it's raining. I won't tolerate it.

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

Fitch said:

---

Tired of baseless claims of fraud.

That is all.

---

I'm tired of people calling it baseless, when it's obvious.

---

Prove it.

---

your Lord and Savior Joe Biden knows you are a fool.

TxAgPreacher said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

Fitch said:

---

Tired of baseless claims of fraud.

That is all.

---

I'm tired of people calling it baseless, when it's obvious.

---

Prove it.

---

You're telling me nothing is fishy when the republicans won the popular vote by millions (something that rarely happens), and then they just so happened to underperform in swing districts AGAIN. When they slow roll the votes there will always be suspicion of fraud. No excuse for that. All the other districts just reported immediately. Only the key races took forever to get results... suuuuuurrrrreeeeeee.

There is no excuse for the lack of transparency. Calling it baseless is dismissive of the obvious irregularities. Of course I don't personally have connections or documents with the proof. When there is smoke there is fire, and there is a lot of smoke. Anyone saying otherwise is a liar.

---

Prove it.

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

Fitch said:

---

Tired of baseless claims of fraud.

That is all.

---

I'm tired of people calling it baseless, when it's obvious.

---

Prove it.

---

You're telling me nothing is fishy when the republicans won the popular vote by millions (something that rarely happens), and then they just so happened to underperform in swing districts AGAIN. When they slow roll the votes there will always be suspicion of fraud. No excuse for that. All the other districts just reported immediately. Only the key races took forever to get results... suuuuuurrrrreeeeeee.

There is no excuse for the lack of transparency. Calling it baseless is dismissive of the obvious irregularities. Of course I don't personally have connections or documents with the proof. When there is smoke there is fire, and there is a lot of smoke. Anyone saying otherwise is a liar.

---

Prove it.

---

I know you are but what am I.

You're just trolling like a kindergartener.

TxAgPreacher said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

Fitch said:

---

Tired of baseless claims of fraud.

That is all.

---

I'm tired of people calling it baseless, when it's obvious.

---

Prove it.

---

You're telling me nothing is fishy when the republicans won the popular vote by millions (something that rarely happens), and then they just so happened to underperform in swing districts AGAIN. When they slow roll the votes there will always be suspicion of fraud. No excuse for that. All the other districts just reported immediately. Only the key races took forever to get results... suuuuuurrrrreeeeeee.

There is no excuse for the lack of transparency. Calling it baseless is dismissive of the obvious irregularities. Of course I don't personally have connections or documents with the proof. When there is smoke there is fire, and there is a lot of smoke. Anyone saying otherwise is a liar.

---

Prove it.

---

I know you are but what am I.

You're just trolling like a kindergartener.

---

Not a troll, just think you all have had plenty of time to prove this vast conspiracy. Trump started saying these things early in his administration which started nearly SIX years ago and many of these alleged frauds occurred in GOP run states. Where is the proof?

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

Fitch said:

---

Tired of baseless claims of fraud.

That is all.

---

I'm tired of people calling it baseless, when it's obvious.

---

Prove it.

---

You're telling me nothing is fishy when the republicans won the popular vote by millions (something that rarely happens), and then they just so happened to underperform in swing districts AGAIN. When they slow roll the votes there will always be suspicion of fraud. No excuse for that. All the other districts just reported immediately. Only the key races took forever to get results... suuuuuurrrrreeeeeee.

There is no excuse for the lack of transparency. Calling it baseless is dismissive of the obvious irregularities. Of course I don't personally have connections or documents with the proof. When there is smoke there is fire, and there is a lot of smoke. Anyone saying otherwise is a liar.

---

Prove it.

---

I know you are but what am I.

You're just trolling like a kindergartener.

---

Not a troll, just think you all have had plenty of time to prove this vast conspiracy. Trump started saying these things early in his administration which started nearly SIX years ago and many of these alleged frauds occurred in GOP run states. Where is the proof?

---

2000 Mules is a start. There is tons of it, but not matter what I bring up you will right off.

How about "water leaks" and boxes of ballots at 3AM... nothing suspicious there.

How about glitches in the machines, turning away in person (heavily republican voters), and Hobbs running the election she was running in without removing herself...

You didn't address my argument, that republicans only seem to underperform in swing districts, even with record turn outs, and winning the popular vote by millions.

TxAgPreacher said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

Fitch said:

---

Tired of baseless claims of fraud.

That is all.

---

I'm tired of people calling it baseless, when it's obvious.

---

Prove it.

---

You're telling me nothing is fishy when the republicans won the popular vote by millions (something that rarely happens), and then they just so happened to underperform in swing districts AGAIN. When they slow roll the votes there will always be suspicion of fraud. No excuse for that. All the other districts just reported immediately. Only the key races took forever to get results... suuuuuurrrrreeeeeee.

There is no excuse for the lack of transparency. Calling it baseless is dismissive of the obvious irregularities. Of course I don't personally have connections or documents with the proof. When there is smoke there is fire, and there is a lot of smoke. Anyone saying otherwise is a liar.

---

Prove it.

---

I know you are but what am I.

You're just trolling like a kindergartener.

---

Not a troll, just think you all have had plenty of time to prove this vast conspiracy. Trump started saying these things early in his administration which started nearly SIX years ago and many of these alleged frauds occurred in GOP run states. Where is the proof?

---

2000 Mules is a start. There is tons of it, but not matter what I bring up you will right off.

How about "water leaks" and boxes of ballots at 3AM... nothing suspicious there.

You didn't address my argument, that republicans only seem to underperform in swing districts, even with record turn outs, and winning the popular vote by millions.

---

Because you overestimate your popularity. I'm not sure I even follow your question, if you win popular vote how are you losing elections at district. This isn't the electoral college.

2000 mules is entertainment for conspiracy theorists, not journalism.

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

Fitch said:

---

Tired of baseless claims of fraud.

That is all.

---

I'm tired of people calling it baseless, when it's obvious.

---

Prove it.

---

You're telling me nothing is fishy when the republicans won the popular vote by millions (something that rarely happens), and then they just so happened to underperform in swing districts AGAIN. When they slow roll the votes there will always be suspicion of fraud. No excuse for that. All the other districts just reported immediately. Only the key races took forever to get results... suuuuuurrrrreeeeeee.

There is no excuse for the lack of transparency. Calling it baseless is dismissive of the obvious irregularities. Of course I don't personally have connections or documents with the proof. When there is smoke there is fire, and there is a lot of smoke. Anyone saying otherwise is a liar.

---

Prove it.

---

I know you are but what am I.

You're just trolling like a kindergartener.

---

Not a troll, just think you all have had plenty of time to prove this vast conspiracy. Trump started saying these things early in his administration which started nearly SIX years ago and many of these alleged frauds occurred in GOP run states. Where is the proof?

---

2000 Mules is a start. There is tons of it, but not matter what I bring up you will right off.

How about "water leaks" and boxes of ballots at 3AM... nothing suspicious there.

You didn't address my argument, that republicans only seem to underperform in swing districts, even with record turn outs, and winning the popular vote by millions.

---

Because you overestimate your popularity.

2000 mules is entertainment for conspiracy theorists, not journalism.

---

Prove it.

TxAgPreacher said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

Fitch said:

---

Tired of baseless claims of fraud.

That is all.

---

I'm tired of people calling it baseless, when it's obvious.

---

Prove it.

---

You're telling me nothing is fishy when the republicans won the popular vote by millions (something that rarely happens), and then they just so happened to underperform in swing districts AGAIN. When they slow roll the votes there will always be suspicion of fraud. No excuse for that. All the other districts just reported immediately. Only the key races took forever to get results... suuuuuurrrrreeeeeee.

There is no excuse for the lack of transparency. Calling it baseless is dismissive of the obvious irregularities. Of course I don't personally have connections or documents with the proof. When there is smoke there is fire, and there is a lot of smoke. Anyone saying otherwise is a liar.

---

Prove it.

---

I know you are but what am I.

You're just trolling like a kindergartener.

---

Not a troll, just think you all have had plenty of time to prove this vast conspiracy. Trump started saying these things early in his administration which started nearly SIX years ago and many of these alleged frauds occurred in GOP run states. Where is the proof?

---

2000 Mules is a start. There is tons of it, but not matter what I bring up you will right off.

How about "water leaks" and boxes of ballots at 3AM... nothing suspicious there.

You didn't address my argument, that republicans only seem to underperform in swing districts, even with record turn outs, and winning the popular vote by millions.

---

Because you overestimate your popularity.

2000 mules is entertainment for conspiracy theorists, not journalism.

---

Prove it.

---

Plenty of proof from actual journalism outlets who reviewed the film. Yuge lies.

TxAgPreacher said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

Fitch said:

---

Tired of baseless claims of fraud.

That is all.

---

I'm tired of people calling it baseless, when it's obvious.

---

Prove it.

---

You're telling me nothing is fishy when the republicans won the popular vote by millions (something that rarely happens), and then they just so happened to underperform in swing districts AGAIN. When they slow roll the votes there will always be suspicion of fraud. No excuse for that. All the other districts just reported immediately. Only the key races took forever to get results... suuuuuurrrrreeeeeee.

There is no excuse for the lack of transparency. Calling it baseless is dismissive of the obvious irregularities. Of course I don't personally have connections or documents with the proof. When there is smoke there is fire, and there is a lot of smoke. Anyone saying otherwise is a liar.

---

Prove it.

---

I know you are but what am I.

You're just trolling like a kindergartener.

---

Not a troll, just think you all have had plenty of time to prove this vast conspiracy. Trump started saying these things early in his administration which started nearly SIX years ago and many of these alleged frauds occurred in GOP run states. Where is the proof?

---

2000 Mules is a start. There is tons of it, but not matter what I bring up you will right off.

How about "water leaks" and boxes of ballots at 3AM... nothing suspicious there.

How about glitches in the machines, turning away in person (heavily republican voters), and Hobbs running the election she was running in without removing herself...

You didn't address my argument, that republicans only seem to underperform in swing districts, even with record turn outs, and winning the popular vote by millions.

---

Winning the popular vote by millions doesn't guarantee much of anything. It's surprising I know.

Faustus said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

Fitch said:

---

Tired of baseless claims of fraud.

That is all.

---

I'm tired of people calling it baseless, when it's obvious.

---

Prove it.

---

You're telling me nothing is fishy when the republicans won the popular vote by millions (something that rarely happens), and then they just so happened to underperform in swing districts AGAIN. When they slow roll the votes there will always be suspicion of fraud. No excuse for that. All the other districts just reported immediately. Only the key races took forever to get results... suuuuuurrrrreeeeeee.

There is no excuse for the lack of transparency. Calling it baseless is dismissive of the obvious irregularities. Of course I don't personally have connections or documents with the proof. When there is smoke there is fire, and there is a lot of smoke. Anyone saying otherwise is a liar.

---

Prove it.

---

I know you are but what am I.

You're just trolling like a kindergartener.

---

Not a troll, just think you all have had plenty of time to prove this vast conspiracy. Trump started saying these things early in his administration which started nearly SIX years ago and many of these alleged frauds occurred in GOP run states. Where is the proof?

---

2000 Mules is a start. There is tons of it, but not matter what I bring up you will right off.

How about "water leaks" and boxes of ballots at 3AM... nothing suspicious there.

How about glitches in the machines, turning away in person (heavily republican voters), and Hobbs running the election she was running in without removing herself...

You didn't address my argument, that republicans only seem to underperform in swing districts, even with record turn outs, and winning the popular vote by millions.

---

Winning the popular vote by millions doesn't guarantee much of anything. It's surprising I know.

---

How many "coincidences" do you need before you get suspicious?

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

Fitch said:

---

Tired of baseless claims of fraud.

That is all.

---

I'm tired of people calling it baseless, when it's obvious.

---

Prove it.

---

You're telling me nothing is fishy when the republicans won the popular vote by millions (something that rarely happens), and then they just so happened to underperform in swing districts AGAIN. When they slow roll the votes there will always be suspicion of fraud. No excuse for that. All the other districts just reported immediately. Only the key races took forever to get results... suuuuuurrrrreeeeeee.

There is no excuse for the lack of transparency. Calling it baseless is dismissive of the obvious irregularities. Of course I don't personally have connections or documents with the proof. When there is smoke there is fire, and there is a lot of smoke. Anyone saying otherwise is a liar.

---

Prove it.

---

I know you are but what am I.

You're just trolling like a kindergartener.

---

Not a troll, just think you all have had plenty of time to prove this vast conspiracy. Trump started saying these things early in his administration which started nearly SIX years ago and many of these alleged frauds occurred in GOP run states. Where is the proof?

---

2000 Mules is a start. There is tons of it, but not matter what I bring up you will right off.

How about "water leaks" and boxes of ballots at 3AM... nothing suspicious there.

You didn't address my argument, that republicans only seem to underperform in swing districts, even with record turn outs, and winning the popular vote by millions.

---

Because you overestimate your popularity.

2000 mules is entertainment for conspiracy theorists, not journalism.

---

Prove it.

---

Plenty of proof from actual journalism outlets who reviewed the film. Yuge lies.

---

Thats not an argument is basically saying "NUH HUH", or "thats already been debunked"

Still have not addressed any of this:

Quote:

---

How about "water leaks" and boxes of ballots at 3AM... nothing suspicious there.

How about glitches in the machines, turning away in person (heavily republican voters), and Hobbs running the election she was running in without removing herself...

You didn't address my argument, that republicans only seem to underperform in swing districts, even with record turn outs, and winning the popular vote by millions.

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

Fitch said:

---

Tired of baseless claims of fraud.

That is all.

---

I'm tired of people calling it baseless, when it's obvious.

---

Prove it.

---

You're telling me nothing is fishy when the republicans won the popular vote by millions (something that rarely happens), and then they just so happened to underperform in swing districts AGAIN. When they slow roll the votes there will always be suspicion of fraud. No excuse for that. All the other districts just reported immediately. Only the key races took forever to get results... suuuuuurrrrreeeeeee.

There is no excuse for the lack of transparency. Calling it baseless is dismissive of the obvious irregularities. Of course I don't personally have connections or documents with the proof. When there is smoke there is fire, and there is a lot of smoke. Anyone saying otherwise is a liar.

---

Prove it.

---

I know you are but what am I.

You're just trolling like a kindergartener.

---

Not a troll, just think you all have had plenty of time to prove this vast conspiracy. Trump started saying these things early in his administration which started nearly SIX years ago and many of these alleged frauds occurred in GOP run states. Where is the proof?

---

2000 Mules is a start. There is tons of it, but not matter what I bring up you will right off.

How about "water leaks" and boxes of ballots at 3AM... nothing suspicious there.

You didn't address my argument, that republicans only seem to underperform in swing districts, even with record turn outs, and winning the popular vote by millions.

---

Because you overestimate your popularity.

2000 mules is entertainment for conspiracy theorists, not journalism.

---

Prove it.

---

Plenty of proof from actual journalism outlets who reviewed the film. Yuge lies.

---

Name a single one.

MouthBQ98 said:

---

Need hard evidence, not just conjecture from improbable polling results.

---

You need to actually investigate it to get evidence.

McKinney Ag69 said:

---

So people can commit election fraud (AZ and NV) which is a felony but if you accuse them of it, you are an outcast and a pariah and you go to jail. This is not a free republic anymore. Change my mind.

I hope you're happy resident libs.

---

I absolutely love this new movement that says if my person didn't win there's election fraud.

Proof? Oh don't worry about that....we don't need proof... Evidence at all? Oh don't worry about that, we'll concoct some internet conspiracies about a shady bucket of papers or something.

Jeez man it's exhausting.

TXAGFAN said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

Fitch said:

---

Tired of baseless claims of fraud.

That is all.

---

I'm tired of people calling it baseless, when it's obvious.

---

Prove it.

---

Grant me full access.

DRocks said:

---

McKinney Ag69 said:

---

So people can commit election fraud (AZ and NV) which is a felony but if you accuse them of it, you are an outcast and a pariah and you go to jail. This is not a free republic anymore. Change my mind.

I hope you're happy resident libs.

---

I absolutely love this new movement that says if my person didn't win there's election fraud.

Proof? Oh don't worry about that....we don't need proof... Evidence at all? Oh don't worry about that, we'll concoct some internet conspiracies about a shady bucket of papers or something.

Jeez man it's exhausting.

---

I find you exhausting, but that's not an argument.

Quote:

---

2000 Mules is a start. There is tons of it, but not matter what I bring up you will right off.

How about "water leaks" and boxes of ballots at 3AM... nothing suspicious there.

How about glitches in the machines, turning away in person (heavily republican voters), and Hobbs running the election she was running in without removing herself...

You didn't address my argument, that republicans only seem to underperform in swing districts, even with record turn outs, and winning the popular vote by millions.

---

Address these and tell me why they are not suspicious.

Calling someone a conspiracy theorist is dismissive.

If none of this is suspicious to you then I think you're dishonest, have your head in the sand, and just want to trust the government.

BluHorseShu said:

---

Gigem314 said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

She could have won had she toned down the crazy.

---

DeSantis won in Florida hammering away at the media and fringe Dem policies just like Lake did. Is he crazy? Or do you just reserve those labels for outspoken females that aren't left of center?

---

Desantis had a better more professional approach conducive to the office he sought. I reserve those labels for out spoken females in general, left or right

---

Funny, I don't recall you calling any on the left 'crazy'. We'll see how "professional" the naysayers think DeSantis is once he's a threat to win the White House. Funny how those goal posts tend to move.

Gigem314 said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

Gigem314 said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

She could have won had she toned down the crazy.

---

DeSantis won in Florida hammering away at the media and fringe Dem policies just like Lake did. Is he crazy? Or do you just reserve those labels for outspoken females that aren't left of center?

---

Desantis had a better more professional approach conducive to the office he sought. I reserve those labels for out spoken females in general, left or right

---

Funny, I don't recall you calling any on the left 'crazy'. We'll see how "professional" the naysayers think DeSantis is once he's a threat to win the White House. Funny how those goal posts tend to move.

---

Some of the more left winged outlets are ahead of the curve as within the last few months I have already seen a few articles painting him as worse/more dangerous than Trump, because he's a man of action and actually gets things done. He'll be a "Nazi" too, just watch.

TxAgPreacher said:

---

DRocks said:

---

McKinney Ag69 said:

---

So people can commit election fraud (AZ and NV) which is a felony but if you accuse them of it, you are an outcast and a pariah and you go to jail. This is not a free republic anymore. Change my mind.

I hope you're happy resident libs.

---

I absolutely love this new movement that says if my person didn't win there's election fraud.

Proof? Oh don't worry about that....we don't need proof... Evidence at all? Oh don't worry about that, we'll concoct some internet conspiracies about a shady bucket of papers or something.

Jeez man it's exhausting.

---

I find you exhausting, but that's not an argument.

Quote:

---

2000 Mules is a start. There is tons of it, but not matter what I bring up you will right off.

How about "water leaks" and boxes of ballots at 3AM... nothing suspicious there.

How about glitches in the machines, turning away in person (heavily republican voters), and Hobbs running the election she was running in without removing herself...

You didn't address my argument, that republicans only seem to underperform in swing districts, even with record turn outs, and winning the popular vote by millions.

---

Address these and tell me why they are not suspicious.

Calling someone a conspiracy theorist is dismissive.

If none of this is suspicious to you then I think you're dishonest, have your head in the sand, and just want to trust the government.

---

The easiest thing in the world is to find tiny little things and decide they're onerous. I'm sorry to tell you the truth is usually far less exciting. There are are more people turned off by Trumpism than those that are excited by it. And thank GOD that is the case.

Oh and 2000 Mules has been PANNED and completely debunked as not only wrong, but asinine.

DRocks said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

DRocks said:

---

McKinney Ag69 said:

---

So people can commit election fraud (AZ and NV) which is a felony but if you accuse them of it, you are an outcast and a pariah and you go to jail. This is not a free republic anymore. Change my mind.

I hope you're happy resident libs.

---

I absolutely love this new movement that says if my person didn't win there's election fraud.

Proof? Oh don't worry about that....we don't need proof... Evidence at all? Oh don't worry about that, we'll concoct some internet conspiracies about a shady bucket of papers or something.

Jeez man it's exhausting.

---

I find you exhausting, but that's not an argument.

Quote:

---

2000 Mules is a start. There is tons of it, but not matter what I bring up you will right off.

How about "water leaks" and boxes of ballots at 3AM... nothing suspicious there.

How about glitches in the machines, turning away in person (heavily republican voters), and Hobbs running the election she was running in without removing herself...

You didn't address my argument, that republicans only seem to underperform in swing districts, even with record turn outs, and winning the popular vote by millions.

---

Address these and tell me why they are not suspicious.

Calling someone a conspiracy theorist is dismissive.

If none of this is suspicious to you then I think you're dishonest, have your head in the sand, and just want to trust the government.

---

The easiest thing in the world is to find tiny little things and decide they're onerous. I'm sorry to tell you the truth is usually far less exciting. There are are more people turned off by Trumpism than those that are excited by it. And thank GOD that is the case.

Oh and 2000 Mules has been PANNED and completely debunked as not only wrong, but asinine.

---

Not an argument. Already been debunked means I cant be bothered to make an argument.

You basically said: I think its this, and I don't find anything you said suspicious.

I don't think you're an honest person. I think you just don't like "Trumpism", so you have blinders on and refuse to argue the points.

TxAgPreacher said:

---

DRocks said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

DRocks said:

---

McKinney Ag69 said:

---

So people can commit election fraud (AZ and NV) which is a felony but if you accuse them of it, you are an outcast and a pariah and you go to jail. This is not a free republic anymore. Change my mind.

I hope you're happy resident libs.

---

I absolutely love this new movement that says if my person didn't win there's election fraud.

Proof? Oh don't worry about that....we don't need proof... Evidence at all? Oh don't worry about that, we'll concoct some internet conspiracies about a shady bucket of papers or something.

Jeez man it's exhausting.

---

I find you exhausting, but that's not an argument.

Quote:

---

2000 Mules is a start. There is tons of it, but not matter what I bring up you will right off.

How about "water leaks" and boxes of ballots at 3AM... nothing suspicious there.

How about glitches in the machines, turning away in person (heavily republican voters), and Hobbs running the election she was running in without removing herself...

You didn't address my argument, that republicans only seem to underperform in swing districts, even with record turn outs, and winning the popular vote by millions.

---

Address these and tell me why they are not suspicious.

Calling someone a conspiracy theorist is dismissive.

If none of this is suspicious to you then I think you're dishonest, have your head in the sand, and just want to trust the government.

---

The easiest thing in the world is to find tiny little things and decide they're onerous. I'm sorry to tell you the truth is usually far less exciting. There are are more people turned off by Trumpism than those that are excited by it. And thank GOD that is the case.

Oh and 2000 Mules has been PANNED and completely debunked as not only wrong, but asinine.

---

Not an argument. Already been debunked means I cant be bothered to make an argument.

You basically said: I think its this, and I don't find anything you said suspicious.

I don't think you're an honest person. I think you just don't like "Trumpism", so you have blinders on and refuse to argue the points.

---

It's a free country and you're free to believe whatever batsh*& stuff you want. Live your life.

the talking points from the 2000 Mules movie critics:

- those "mules" who visited drop boxes at least 10 times could have been uber drivers
- gps data acquired by TTV and analyzed to detect mules isn't accurate enough
- they didn't show enough video surveillance of the same mule at different boxes (coincidentally this proves the point that there are too many unsurveiled insecure boxes everywhere)
- one of the mules highlighted in the movie is suing them because all the ballots he was stuffing in video were for his family so he's not a mule


regardless of the "deboooooonked!!!! most secure election evvvaaarrrr" talking points, there is too much there to not beg questions and at least consider wondering what exactly the half a billion dollars from Zuckerberg to CTCL to local NGOs was used for if not to pay people to use ERIC data to register people that are unregistered, to request mail-in ballots for them and people registered that don't vote, to either intercept and fill out or go to homes and fill out ballots, and to drop off ballots for them?

Are the electioneering and harvesting operations that elitists like Zuckerburg funded heroic because they helped save "our democracy" from orange man?

Is a system intentionally built to use insecure and out of date registration rolls to mass mail that many ballots for absentee voting to people who aren't absent and hundreds of insecure drop boxes without audit trails or chain of custody controls around the cities really what we need to "save our democracy" when it disenfranchises half the population?

When you dismiss all concerns, fight tooth and nail against audits and integrity legislation, and call anti-fraud controls like IDs to ensure the people voting are the people registered (which means they are 18, they are still alive and still live there, they aren't felons, and they aren't registered somewhere else) - calling that racist voter suppression is insulting and by dismissing concerns, calling people racist, and lying that it's the most secure election ever is only asking for some extreme reactions.

Im Gipper said:

---

BuddysBud said:

---

Yes, that is moderate compared to Fetterman.

Why wouldn't Democrats crossover to vote for a cognitively sound person who lines up with their beliefs rather than a guy who cannot complete one sentence?

Oz should have easily won a purple state.

He is a prime example showing that the argument that Republicans need to act more like Democrats to win elections is complete BS.

---

You originally said "Politically Oz is a true moderate in today's political world."

That just isn't the case.

As for Democrat voters, you mistakenly think they are putting much thought into this. Being on a politics board has you thinking everyone is into this like we are. That just ain't so.


The bolded is dead on accurate my man!

---

I'll agree with you that Oz isn't a moderate, he leans left. The tweet storm in this thread points out all the non-Conservative positions he has taken.

So Dems should have been completely fine with him, Fetterman is way left and impaired.

In places where harvesting is allowed, Rs will have to do it. Just letting the people who will vote on their own do so won't overcome pro-actively making sure your team fills out their ballots, then carrying them to the precinct for them.