Election Fraud

15,616 Views | 235 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by Whistle Pig
Tom Kazansky 2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boboguitar said:

Republican clowns election fraud workflow:

Did we lose?

If yes, fraud.

If no, democrats didn't focus on cheating on that race and it was a completely fair election.

Republicans polled 4 to 1 in Maricopa county on election day in exit polling.

Still counting votes from election day a week later and they break 70% to the democrat just in time to win by 20k votes in a state with 2,500,000 voters.

Dems know it is fraud and are lashing out that their political castle is built on a foundation of sand.

You and your ideology are nothing without lying, cheating, and subverting the will of the people.
Showertime at the Bidens
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BG Knocc Out said:

Zarathustra said:


First of all, don't say election fraud unless you can prove election fraud.

Stick to what you can prove. The vote counting process is not transparent and not credible. It would never pass any real world audit test.
This, we need to focus on how shady it is. "Fraud" falls on deaf ears if you can't prove it. In fact, the left...masters of PR(opaganda)...have weaponized this against us. Coining the term "election denier" and basically painting people as stupid flat earthers in the mind of the left and the overall uninformed general populace.


Exactly. Scott Adams always says the key to persuasion is to get the other person to think about the issue. Election fraud is yes or no and that's it. But election transparency and credibility gets people thinking about the process, and once you start thinking about the process there's no other conclusion.
boboguitar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

You and your ideology are nothing without lying, cheating, and subverting the will of the people.
Republican projection right here.
JWinTX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The biggest issue for the GOP is that getting quality candidates to run is hard to do. They overwhelmingly know what the media and the libs are gonna do to them and their family if they run for Senate, Governor, or President. It's a really hard path to put your entire family through, especially young kids.
unmade bed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tom Kazansky 2012 said:

boboguitar said:

Republican clowns election fraud workflow:

Did we lose?

If yes, fraud.

If no, democrats didn't focus on cheating on that race and it was a completely fair election.

Republicans polled 4 to 1 in Maricopa county on election day in exit polling.

Still counting votes from election day a week later and they break 70% to the democrat just in time to win by 20k votes in a state with 2,500,000 voters.

Dems know it is fraud and are lashing out that their political castle is built on a foundation of sand.

You and your ideology are nothing without lying, cheating, and subverting the will of the people.


Hobbs and Kelly were both ahead in Arizona on Election Day. The votes that were counted after Election Day narrowed the races but not enough
Ramdiesel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fitch said:

Tired of baseless claims of fraud.

That is all.


It's impossible to get hard evidence with the voting privacy laws and contracts with vendors like Dominion that will not allow people to see their code, databases, or logs. It's a big circle jerk.

All you get are statistical improbabilities and impossibilities that point to fraud but no way to prove it, which is total bullcrap. Everything should be transparent in our elections...
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fetterman might be the worst quality candidate the US Senate has ever seen in history.

the calculus on endorsing Oz over McCormick (I liked Barnette the best), was that Oprah fans, name recognition, smart, articulate communicator would be the layup and fighting flimsy attacks over carpetbagging would be easier than whatever attacks would have been flung at McCormick.

PA's progressive socialist legislators have made sure they are mail-in "fortified" and massive funding from people outside of PA made sure enough people were lied to in political attack ads.

It's not "candidate quality" when you can place a brain-damaged radical progressive socialist as one of the top 100 law makers in the land.
BG Knocc Out
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boboguitar said:

Quote:

You and your ideology are nothing without lying, cheating, and subverting the will of the people.
Republican projection right here.
This says it all. Wish it was easier to ignore posters like you but you make it so damn difficult bc you are completely loathsome...intentionally.

Projection is one of the fundamental hallmarks of your warped religion. That is what you guys do best. You're doing it right now, it's absurd.
BG Knocc Out
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oh no said:

Fetterman might be the worst quality candidate the US Senate has ever seen in history.
He is literally worse than the dead democrat that dems also voted for and "elected". That is incredible. But I guess virtually any democrat is worse than a dead person if you think about it.
Detmersdislocatedshoulder
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GeorgiAg said:

Detmersdislocatedshoulder said:

does joe biden saying they have the greatest voter fraud apparatus in american history count as evidence?
This is the equivalent of misquoting Trump on the "very fine people on both sides" speech. Sounds good in the abstract but it's not what he meant.


i was watching when he said it i do not believe it was taken out of context, people dismiss because he is a talking vegetable but that doesn't mean he wasnt being honest. in light of all that has happened in the 2020 and 2022 elections i find it hard to believe that so many would dismiss what he said.
TXAGFAN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
McKinney Ag69 said:

So people can commit election fraud (AZ and NV) which is a felony but if you accuse them of it, you are an outcast and a pariah and you go to jail. This is not a free republic anymore. Change my mind.

I hope you're happy resident libs.


Prove it and people would care, added bonus is you won't appear unhinged.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GeorgiAg said:

Detmersdislocatedshoulder said:

does joe biden saying they have the greatest voter fraud apparatus in american history count as evidence?
This is the equivalent of misquoting Trump on the "very fine people on both sides" speech. Sounds good in the abstract but it's not what he meant.
No, those two things are not the equivalent. "Very fine people on both sides" was intentionally taken and misused by media and social media to deceive people. "Voter fraud" was flat-out stated point-blank by your Fuhrer.
BuddysBud
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oh no said:

Ag CPA said:

Quit running unelectable MAGA candidates in purple states.
no more candidate excuses when Dems can place brain damaged and senile candidates in offices.


Democrats even elected a dead guy.
Bad candidates don't matter if you control who counts the votes.
William K. Klingaman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MouthBQ98 said:

Need hard evidence, not just conjecture from improbable polling results.


Like 75% of Americans saying this country is going in the wrong direction and now - after a week of "counting votes" - we still don't have the election settled and somehow those votes are helping the Dems?

Please tell me you're not this dense.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
William K. Klingaman said:

MouthBQ98 said:

Need hard evidence, not just conjecture from improbable polling results.


Like 75% of Americans saying this country is going in the wrong direction and now - after a week of "counting votes" - we still don't have the election settled and somehow those votes are helping the Dems?

Please tell me you're not this dense.
MouthBQ is a pretty sharp guy. Seems you may consider taking a look in the mirror.

I'm Gipper
BuddysBud
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GeorgiAg said:

oh no said:

Ag CPA said:

Quit running unelectable MAGA candidates in purple states.
no more candidate excuses when Dems can place brain damaged and senile candidates in offices.
Fetterman v. Oz? Prime example of a hand selected Trump candidate losing an election any "establishment" R would have won easily.

I don't think this helps you argument.


Politically Oz is a true moderate in today's political world. He is just the kind of candidate that should appeal to those who keep saying that candidates who want to make America great again are unelectable.
boboguitar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BG Knocc Out said:

boboguitar said:

Quote:

You and your ideology are nothing without lying, cheating, and subverting the will of the people.
Republican projection right here.
This says it all. Wish it was easier to ignore posters like you but you make it so damn difficult bc you are completely loathsome...intentionally.

Projection is one of the fundamental hallmarks of your warped religion. That is what you guys do best. You're doing it right now, it's absurd.
I'm projecting projection?

Do you even think about the arguments your making before you post?
WHOOP!'91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boboguitar said:

Quote:

You and your ideology are nothing without lying, cheating, and subverting the will of the people.
Republican projection right here.
Socialist denial right here.
one MEEN Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MouthBQ98 said:

Need hard evidence, not just conjecture from improbable polling results.
Look, unless you get someone who fears for their own salvation and then decides to publicly confess this sin its not going to get 'hard evidence.'

Once the ballot is in the mail, the fix is already in. So its going to pass an audit because its not someone who scribbled 'NOT KARI LAKE' across the top of a piece of construction paper and is trying to claim its a ballot.

There is a consortium named ERIC that has a list of known voters, voter history, and more importantly, known fake addresses that ballots can be sent to. So someone is requesting mail in ballots, of real people, who don't vote, and asking them to be delivered to addresses that can be easily intercepted. These ballots are swooped up, filled out, and dropped back in the mail.

Or, you get ballot harvesters who go door to door and get people to fill out requests for mail in ballots. Then they come by again and remind people to turn their ballots back in. Some states have made it illegal to for ballot harvestors to take the ballots off their hands and drop them in the mail for them. Rightly so. But its pretty easy to figure out what neighborhoods to target to make sure that a huge amount of those encouraged ballots vote democrat.
agAngeldad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GeorgiAg said:

McKinney Ag69 said:

MouthBQ98 said:

Need hard evidence, not just conjecture from improbable polling results.
You're telling me a clown like Hobbs won over Kari Lake who is polished and had a great platform legitimately?

Hobbs oversaw the election process instead of recusing herself. I can't think of a bigger conflict of interest.
Secretary of State Kemp did the same when he ran against Abrams the first time, not this election. Of course Abrams complained about cheating then too.

Also, great platform? You mean the "I love Trump and the elections are a fraud" platform? That was a loser nation-wide.
Election Denier?
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BuddysBud said:

GeorgiAg said:

oh no said:

Ag CPA said:

Quit running unelectable MAGA candidates in purple states.
no more candidate excuses when Dems can place brain damaged and senile candidates in offices.
Fetterman v. Oz? Prime example of a hand selected Trump candidate losing an election any "establishment" R would have won easily.

I don't think this helps you argument.


Politically Oz is a true moderate. He is just the kind of candidate that should appeal to those who keep saying that candidates who want to make America great again are unelectable.
Moderate? If this is "moderate" we are more F'd than I thought!

(Shout out to Buffalo Guy for compiling list) https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3282894














I'm Gipper
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I feel like I missed a few of these cheating threads, so just posting to say that I was here.

Here.
Sumlins Pool Guy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Most dems didn't think Hillary was a bad candidate compared to trump
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MouthBQ98 said:

Need hard evidence, not just conjecture from improbable polling results.
Propose policies that make it very hard to cheat like voter ID and elimination of mail in ballots and see which side complains.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fitch said:

Tired of baseless claims of fraud.

That is all.


Then get behind full scale investigations.
BuddysBud
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yes, that is moderate compared to Fetterman.

Why wouldn't Democrats crossover to vote for a cognitively sound person who lines up with their beliefs rather than a guy who cannot complete one sentence?

Oz should have easily won a purple state.

He is a prime example showing that the argument that Republicans need to act more like Democrats to win elections is complete BS.
tremble
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Old McDonald said:

oh no said:

Ag CPA said:

Quit running unelectable MAGA candidates in purple states.
no more candidate excuses when Dems can place brain damaged and senile candidates in offices.
PA was a republican layup until trump pushed oz through


Honestly, Mastriano was much worse of a Trump pick. That guy probably cost Rs the Senate and a ton of down-ballot races.
AGHouston11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BG Knocc Out said:

Zarathustra said:


First of all, don't say election fraud unless you can prove election fraud.

Stick to what you can prove. The vote counting process is not transparent and not credible. It would never pass any real world audit test.
This, we need to focus on how shady it is. "Fraud" falls on deaf ears if you can't prove it. In fact, the left...masters of PR(opaganda)...have weaponized this against us. Coining the term "election denier" and basically painting people as stupid flat earthers in the mind of the left and the overall uninformed general populace.


You can call it whatever fancy name you want! The swamp will spin it and you will be mocked!
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
one MEEN Ag said:

MouthBQ98 said:

Need hard evidence, not just conjecture from improbable polling results.
Look, unless you get someone who fears for their own salvation and then decides to publicly confess this sin its not going to get 'hard evidence.'

Once the ballot is in the mail, the fix is already in. So its going to pass an audit because its not someone who scribbled 'NOT KARI LAKE' across the top of a piece of construction paper and is trying to claim its a ballot.

There is a consortium named ERIC that has a list of known voters, voter history, and more importantly, known fake addresses that ballots can be sent to. So someone is requesting mail in ballots, of real people, who don't vote, and asking them to be delivered to addresses that can be easily intercepted. These ballots are swooped up, filled out, and dropped back in the mail.

Or, you get ballot harvesters who go door to door and get people to fill out requests for mail in ballots. Then they come by again and remind people to turn their ballots back in. Some states have made it illegal to for ballot harvestors to take the ballots off their hands and drop them in the mail for them. Rightly so. But its pretty easy to figure out what neighborhoods to target to make sure that a huge amount of those encouraged ballots vote democrat.


Republicans, if they cannot change the verification to be secure, or clean up rolls, will have to match.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BuddysBud said:

Yes, that is moderate compared to Fetterman.

Why wouldn't Democrats crossover to vote for a cognitively sound person who lines up with their beliefs rather than a guy who cannot complete one sentence?

Oz should have easily won a purple state.

He is a prime example showing that the argument that Republicans need to act more like Democrats to win elections is complete BS.
You originally said "Politically Oz is a true moderate in today's political world."

That just isn't the case.

As for Democrat voters, you mistakenly think they are putting much thought into this. Being on a politics board has you thinking everyone is into this like we are. That just ain't so.


The bolded is dead on accurate my man!


I'm Gipper
Ramdiesel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GeorgiAg said:

McKinney Ag69 said:

MouthBQ98 said:

Need hard evidence, not just conjecture from improbable polling results.
You're telling me a clown like Hobbs won over Kari Lake who is polished and had a great platform legitimately?

Hobbs oversaw the election process instead of recusing herself. I can't think of a bigger conflict of interest.
Secretary of State Kemp did the same when he ran against Abrams the first time, not this election. Of course Abrams complained about cheating then too.

Also, great platform? You mean the "I love Trump and the elections are a fraud" platform? That was a loser nation-wide.


So, what was Hobbs Platform? I won't debate and i'll hide in my castle? Vote for me you morons, I have a D beside my name?

I live in Arizona, and I couldn't really tell you anything about Hobbs, other than I watched her stutter her way through a very old interview once.

Explain how vegetables like Fetterman and Biden and now someone like Hobbs who may or may not be a vegetable, can hide out in their ivory towers and get elected? I've never seen that in my entire life until these recent elections.

Could it be possible they know the fix is in?
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Voting now like closing your eyes and the teacher counts the raised hands.
TheEternalPessimist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GeorgiAg said:

Explain Kemp winning easily and H. Walker losing slightly and having to go to a runoff. Explain all the other instances of election deniers losing and other Rs winning easily.

Cheating? Or real humans voting or withholding votes from candidates they don't like?

Definitely has to be mastermind super-secret cheating.
You should have voted for the fat gap toothed election denying whale. She was more your type.
--

"The Kingdom is for HE that can TAKE IT!" - Alexander
blacksox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ramdiesel said:

GeorgiAg said:

McKinney Ag69 said:

MouthBQ98 said:

Need hard evidence, not just conjecture from improbable polling results.
You're telling me a clown like Hobbs won over Kari Lake who is polished and had a great platform legitimately?

Hobbs oversaw the election process instead of recusing herself. I can't think of a bigger conflict of interest.
Secretary of State Kemp did the same when he ran against Abrams the first time, not this election. Of course Abrams complained about cheating then too.

Also, great platform? You mean the "I love Trump and the elections are a fraud" platform? That was a loser nation-wide.


So, what was Hobbs Platform? I won't debate and i'll hide in my castle? Vote for me you morons, I have a D beside my name?

I live in Arizona, and I couldn't really tell you anything about Hobbs, other than I watched her stutter her way through a very old interview once.

Explain how vegetables like Fetterman and Biden and now someone like Hobbs who may or may not be a vegetable, can hide out in their ivory towers and get elected? I've never seen that in my entire life until these recent elections.

Could it be possible they know the fix is in?
Strikes me that dems don't have to do much to get elected when their opponent is from the Trump political tree. He's the common thread. People just don't like the Donald these days.
JFABNRGR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Funky Winkerbean said:

Fitch said:

Tired of baseless claims of fraud.

That is all.


Then get behind full scale investigations.
This right here is the PROBLEM not because some poster on TXAGS isn't behind a full scale investigation but because those who would conduct the investigations and or the courts who would oversee them have no interest, because it does not serve their interest and because people are nave on how wide corruption/evil really exists that enough doubt is sown that people simply flash the comment "tired of baseless claims of fraud" or "There is republicans in charge or even won, how can this be".

"Money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and it's issuance." James Madison

"If ever a time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin." Samuel Adams

“You can resolve to live your life with integrity. Let your credo be this: Let the lie come into the world, let it even triumph. But not through me.”
- Alexander Solzhenitsyn
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.