“We told [Fox News]. We told them in real-time. Others told them. Government officials told them. Partisan government officials told them… This is not a matter of not knowing the truth. They knew the truth,” Dominion CEO John Poulos tells @andersoncooper. https://t.co/GhwRLO0vSt pic.twitter.com/SebpQNjPJb
— 60 Minutes (@60Minutes) October 23, 2022
The machines are made using COTS components. Every one of which can allow for backdoor access into the systems. Only ****ing commies shill for these machines.Artorias said:
Until they allow their software to be audited, I don't give two ****s what he has to say. How can anyone possibly trust election results when nobody can look at the code of the software that is counting the results?
Win At Life said:
So what exactly did "they" tell to "them"?
They are in the middle of that process now.Aggie4Life02 said:
Then it should be easy to win a lawsuit.
They have.Artorias said:
Until they allow their software to be audited, I don't give two ****s what he has to say. How can anyone possibly trust election results when nobody can look at the code of the software that is counting the results?
You know... told themAGHouston11 said:Win At Life said:
So what exactly did "they" tell to "them"?
Exactly- told them what
Link to the last code review, please.etxag02 said:They have.Artorias said:
Until they allow their software to be audited, I don't give two ****s what he has to say. How can anyone possibly trust election results when nobody can look at the code of the software that is counting the results?
Democracy Suite 5.5-C Dominion Voting Systems Corp VVSG 1.0 (2005) 2020-07-09
Democracy Suite 5.5-D Dominion Voting Systems Corp VVSG 1.0 (2005) 2022-06-08
https://www.eac.gov/voting-equipment/certified-voting-systems
Well this sounds like an exhaustive review. From the last "review" prior to the 2020 election, in July 2020.etxag02 said:
You replied to it.
etxag02 said:
They did.
https://ktar.com/story/4862350/special-master-selects-experts-to-analyze-maricopa-county-routers-splunk-logs/
etxag02 said:
They don't.
https://www.co.sherburne.mn.us/1280/About-Dominion-Voting-Systems
AgNav93 said:
The fact that Soros has his hands in this should be enough to convince any one. But, hey, he's on your side, leftists. So he's a good guy. The ends justify the means.
Maricopa never gave the routers to Cyber Ninja, whos founder said there was election fraud before the audit began. Makes perfect sense that the county wanted impartial inspectors to audit their equipment. The shenanigans in this case have all been from the right. Maricopa election officials are Republicans and the party turned on them because somebody could not concede an election.D-Fens said:etxag02 said:
They did.
https://ktar.com/story/4862350/special-master-selects-experts-to-analyze-maricopa-county-routers-splunk-logs/
They never gave the router logs to the auditors. And there was never any legitimacy to their claims about endangering officers or exposing health records.
There was an agreement much later to let 3 inspectors (not part of the audit team) review if the routers were connected to internet. Kind of like the independent experts who reviewed Hunter laptop claims to confirm it was fake and Russia disninfo.
It's hard to trust any review much later with all the shenanigans that went on and the absolutely nonsensical claims about endangering cops and exposing individual health records. That all said, this election was stolen via mail ballot box stuffing not Dominion.
It is worth looking into why Soros is venturing into the election machine biz and connection between him and Dominion leadership.
Yeah, that brought up huge red flags. That's about the time I said good bye to Fox NewsAGHouston11 said:AgNav93 said:
The fact that Soros has his hands in this should be enough to convince any one. But, hey, he's on your side, leftists. So he's a good guy. The ends justify the means.
For some reason I'm reminded of the show on Fox where Newt was trying to say something about Soros funding DA races and he was cut off and no anti Soros talk was going to be allowed.
Quote:
Describing a perfect storm of mistakes and omissions, the report charged that CBS disregarded basic principles of journalism because of a "myopic zeal" to be the first news organization to broadcast what was believed to be a new story.
Where is this from? If recorded somewhere, I'd love to see it.Bonfire1996 said:
Eric Coomer, VP of Engineering, Dominion Voting Systems:
"Don't worry about the election; Trump's not gonna win. I made f***ing sure of that!"
Bonfire1996 said:
Eric Coomer, VP of Engineering, Dominion Voting Systems:
"Don't worry about the election; Trump's not gonna win. I made f***ing sure of that!"
They audited COMMENTS in the code? WTF?Artorias said:Well this sounds like an exhaustive review. From the last "review" prior to the 2020 election, in July 2020.etxag02 said:
You replied to it.
Manual Source Code Review: The Manual Source Code review was performed on 10% of the comments from the new source code for compliance to VVSG Volume Section 5.2.7. No source code issues were found during the Manual Source Code review
On live TV exactly 19,958 votes taken from Trump and switched to Biden in Pennsylvania. Watch the PA totals change pic.twitter.com/TnBs7ZjUyW
— robert mandry (@MandryRobert) November 10, 2020
Quote:
(Sep. 1, 2016) On Friday, August 26th, during a meeting at the Illinois State Board of Elections, the Vice President of Engineering for Dominion Voting, Dr. Eric Coomer*, was asked if it was possible to bypass election systems software and go directly to the data tables that manage systems running elections in Illinois. His response was, "Yes, if they have access."
Bypassing the election systems software means whoever has access can potentially manipulate the vote without many risks of detection. So the question needs to be asked, who has access to these data tables?
We asked Dr. Coomer that question. Dr. Coomer replied, 'Vendors, election officials, and others who need to be granted access.'
LINKQuote:
Dr. Coomer's statement is an admission that various vendors, election officials, and others have access to the back end data tables that permit bypassing the operating system's configuration. It is notable that when someone accesses these systems from a data table, their actions are not logged by the system; thereby making detection much more problematic. This contradicts Dr. Coomer's assurances that the system is secure.
Our letter to the Illinois State Board of Elections on August 17th specifically requested the Board to answer the following questions:
5) At the ISBE level:
[ol]Who has access to software produced by vendors? Has the ISBE had an expert examine the computer code? How is access granted and documented? What role does the ISBE play in monitoring the GEMS software used in each election jurisdiction?
[/ol]As is typical for the Board members at the Illinois State Board of Elections, with its rich history in treating citizens concerned about election security with disregard and disrespect, the Board refused to say a single word regarding Defend the Vote's concerns expressed during 'public comments'. Only 4 of the 8 members of the Board bothered to stay to hear our comments. To date, the Board has failed to provide answers to the questions asked in our letter.
And that is not all! The Board asked Dr. Coomer if he had any comments. In direct response to the Illinois State Board, Dr. Coomer made the following statement:
"We are constantly assessing different threat models against all of our systems we have fielded across the US and internationally as well. Due to the certification environment that we are in, no we are not allowed to do routine updates without having to go through re-certification efforts, but we do routinely give guidance on how to best secure systems and also going back again, to the final mitigation against all of this is a robust auditing canvasing process which all of our jurisdictions have implemented."
Dr. Coomer failed to mention that Illinois does not have any auditing procedure for absentee mail-in ballots. In 2014, mail-in paper balloting was 8% of the vote. Across Illinois, many election jurisdictions are working to increase this percentage! Illinois does not require any justification when audits show a vote discrepancy. They simply correct the total votes that are reported to the new totals found in the audit. Further, it is not a blind audit. Auditors know what vote totals were reported before they begin the post-election re-count. So much for Coomer's robust auditing process…
