Ag with kids said:

---

Artorias said:

---

etxag02 said:

---

You replied to it.

---

Well this sounds like an exhaustive review. From the last "review" prior to the 2020 election, in July 2020.

Manual Source Code Review: The Manual Source Code review was performed on 10% of the comments from the new source code for compliance to VVSG Volume Section 5.2.7. No source code issues were found during the Manual Source Code review

---

They audited COMMENTS in the code? WTF?

My last place we had comments in the code that had been incorrect since the 70s...

---

10% of the comments, from the NEW source code.

Seems reasonable. Unscrupulous programmers would obviously use the comments to document any nefarious code.

Lol! Are we back to krackens?

The machines had internet access.. blatantly insecure in so many ways as has already been discussed in the 2020 election thread ad nauseum ... votes could be manipulated... Dominion is the liar here.

M-K-TAG said:

---

The machines had internet access.. blatantly insecure in so many way as has already been discussed in the 2020 election thread ad nauseum ... votes could be manipulated... Dominion is the liar here.

---

They weren't Certified per the HAVA act either.

The Green Dragon said:

---

Lol! Are we back to krackens?

---

"Guys, don't you know all of this has been deboonked. Snopes and the dominion CEO told me so"

I just love it when people post this **** thinking it's the truth. ****ing hilarious!

Best part about Dominion is that Texas banned it before they were caught being negligent.

Signel said:

---

Best part about Dominion is that Texas banned it before they were caught being negligent.

---

Hart Verity and ES&S are every bit as ****ty. There's zero reason to use electronic voting of any kind.

Why isn't someone somewhere dragging this f#*%*@& george soros out of his hole and making him uncomfortable by answering questions start at the top and see where it goes.

Pookers said:

---

Signel said:

---

Best part about Dominion is that Texas banned it before they were caught being negligent.

---

Hart Verity and ES&S are every bit as ****ty. There's zero reason to use electronic voting of any kind.

---

They all are highly insecure, by design I might add.

VegasAg86 said:

---

Ag with kids said:

---

Artorias said:

---

etxag02 said:

---

You replied to it.

---

Well this sounds like an exhaustive review. From the last "review" prior to the 2020 election, in July 2020.

Manual Source Code Review: The Manual Source Code review was performed on 10% of the comments from the new source code for compliance to VVSG Volume Section 5.2.7. No source code issues were found during the Manual Source Code review

---

They audited COMMENTS in the code? WTF?

My last place we had comments in the code that had been incorrect since the 70s...

---

10% of the comments, from the NEW source code.

Seems reasonable. Unscrupulous programmers would obviously use the comments to document any nefarious code.

---

Clearly there was no problem if they didn't find anywhere in that 10% of the comments that said...

// Switches votes from R candidate to D candidate

aggiehawg said:

---

Pookers said:

---

Signel said:

---

Best part about Dominion is that Texas banned it before they were caught being negligent.

---

Hart Verity and ES&S are every bit as ****ty. There's zero reason to use electronic voting of any kind.

---

They all are highly insecure, by design I might add.

---

Indeed, The whole system is designed in such a way that nobody is responsible. Its the perfect system for stealing votes.

Pookers said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Pookers said:

---

Signel said:

---

Best part about Dominion is that Texas banned it before they were caught being negligent.

---

Hart Verity and ES&S are every bit as ****ty. There's zero reason to use electronic voting of any kind.

---

They all are highly insecure, by design I might add.

---

Indeed, The whole system is designed in such a way that nobody is responsible. Its the perfect system for stealing votes.

---

Or to analyze after the election if votes were being stolen.

There is no record of changes and or reconciliation component of the systems. Should NEVER have been approved for use and should be removed from service NOW.

JFABNRGR said:

---

Pookers said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Pookers said:

---

Signel said:

---

Best part about Dominion is that Texas banned it before they were caught being negligent.

---

Hart Verity and ES&S are every bit as ****ty. There's zero reason to use electronic voting of any kind.

---

They all are highly insecure, by design I might add.

---

Indeed, The whole system is designed in such a way that nobody is responsible. Its the perfect system for stealing votes.

---

Or to analyze after the election if votes were being stolen.

There is no record of changes and or reconciliation component of the systems. Should NEVER have been approved for use and should be removed from service NOW.

---

Deus Vult.

Quote:

---

Indeed, The whole system is designed in such a way that nobody is responsible. Its the perfect system for stealing votes.

---

They have been adding additional layers as well. Overinflated voter rols containing phantom voters courtesy of ERIC (Soros org) having contracts with a ton of states to manage their voter rolls. Those contracts prohibit the states from using the info compiled to dissemination to any outside entity BUT ERIC has unfettered ability to provide the same info to any organization, NGO or Dem voter fraud organization such as CEIR and CTCL that they wish.

Hell you probably can buy a state's voter rolls at a flea market by now.

I mean...who isn't convinced by the assurances we have been given?

Company - our software is perfect! Trust us!
Government agencies who bought a bunch of software and machines - It's secure, trust us!

Skeptics - OK, let's do an audit so we know we can actually trust you

Company & Government - ABSOLUTELY NOT!!!! YOU JUST NEED TO KNOW YOUR PLACE AND TRUST US!!!!!!

Skeptics - Hey, if you are proven right through a thorough and independent audit, we will trust you and so will most everybody else, let us do the audit.

Company and Government - NO WAY IN ABSOLUTE HELL WILL THAT EVER HAPPEN! SUE US IN COURT!!!! WHY WON'T YOU TRUST US????

Seriously, how can anybody not blindly trust them after that type of reasoning? (For some of you, and I hate that I have to state the obvious, that was 100% pure sarcasm).

Until they allow a full, open and independent audit and review of machines and systems not selected by them, F them and their "trust us" garbage.

Thousands of risk limiting audits, 7 million paper ballots counted by hand confirmed the machine accuracy.

Some of the states Powell accused use exclusively hand marked ballots, making the theory impossible. It was obvious from the beginning Powell had no idea how her stupid theory worked, she didn't even know basic election processes.

cupcakesprinkles said:

---

So Dominion is basically telling everyone that they should believe them while not providing any access to their code to prove their machines are secure?

---

And the secret, trade marked code is basically 100 level C like code
while(count) {
...if (vote == 'R') {
......if (random(10) != 7) { // or an other number you like for an average of 10% of votes discarded
......... r_vote ++; // increment Repub total
..... }
...}
...if (vote == 'D') {
.......d_vote++; //always increment d_total;
...}
}

Many different ways to do the same thing. This is why the source code should be public.

random(n) or rnd(f) is a function that produces a random number between 0 and n. like rolling dice.

7 million paper ballots counted by hand. Thousands of RLA partial hand counts. 2.2 million paper ballots counted by hand in Maricopa by the craziest Trump nutters from all over the county.

All confirmed the machine count. Sidney lied, now she's publicly humiliated and getting disbarred.

Whistle Pig said:

---

7 million paper ballots counted by hand. Thousands of RLA partial hand counts. 2.2 million paper ballots counted by hand in Maricopa by the craziest Trump nutters from all over the county.

All confirmed the machine count. Sidney lied, now she's publicly humiliated and getting disbarred.

---

We have alleen pkenty of images of ballots being flat out changed.

But lemmings continue to eat up the company mantra, and at the same time vehemently defend an actual no BS audit.

Quote:

---

We have alleen pkenty of images of ballots being flat out changed.

---

What are you saying, what do you mean, and provide a cite.

"Images of ballots" have nothing to do with the 7 million paper ballots that were physically counted by hand. That's about 7 million more than were checked in 2016, the results of which you accept, presumably.

They distanced from Rudy and Sidney after the press conference at 4 seasons landscaping, not because they were lying, but because they were embarrassing the campaign.

Trump kept spreading the same absurd lies, but cast away his clown lawyers because they were discrediting his lies, instead of helping him spread them.

Whistle Pig said:

---

They distanced from Rudy and Sidney after the press conference at 4 seasons landscaping, not because they were lying, but because they were embarrassing the campaign.

Trump kept spreading the same absurd lies, but cast away his clown lawyers because they were discrediting his lies, instead of helping him spread them.

---

I and others spent way too much time arguing here with folks who have no clue what a code review is, but keep hearing buzzwords like routers, internet access, forensic code analysis from the latest nutjob entertainer on Fox.

A lot of good people who initially thought it was rigged realized the election was legit once they actually started analyzing some of these claims. But still ignore the fact that every court, including the supreme court rejected or refused to take on election fraud cases, nobody can provide any proof at all, nobody can provide any recording of Eric Coomer saying he's fixing the results and on and on and on.

Not to mention nobody here brought up voting fraud when Trump was breaking the blue wall in 2016, nor last years republican victories, nor the fact that this fraud allegedly happened in ruby red Georgia or Arizona with strict voter id requirements.

It's all just emotion and being swindled by fraud conspiracy theorists, as is always is. Popped in to see if anything has changed,, never disappoints!

Quote:

---

Not to mention nobody here brought up voting fraud when Trump was breaking the blue wall in 2016, nor last years republican victories, nor the fact that this fraud allegedly happened in ruby red Georgia or Arizona with strict voter id requirements.

---

All of which were thrown out of the window in 2020. There are few chain of custody documents supporting those ballots, for obvious reasons. Few of the rules were followed in 2020.

But hey, the most secure elections evah.

If the "cheaters" filled out the paperwork impeccably it's not like you would accept the result.

It was Dominion switching the vote. No
It was mules. No
It must have been the county staff that transported the ballots from dropboxes to counting centers which has nothing to do with the previous failed theories.

Fox executives knew Trump and his clown lawyers were lying.

Quote:

---

"We can't give the crazies an inch,"
People who have been in meetings with (Fox CEO Suzanne)Scott offered further insight to the Times, saying she has "been critical" of Trump's refusal to accept his 2020 election loss, and in a meeting shortly after the 2020 election "seemed in disbelief as she described how people she considered otherwise serious and rational thought there was any chance Mr. Trump could legitimately stop President Biden's inauguration,"

---

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/10/fox-news-dominion-lawsuit-suzanne-scott

Artorias said:

---

Until they allow their software to be audited, I don't give two ****s what he has to say. How can anyone possibly trust election results when nobody can look at the code of the software that is counting the results?

---

You're right, I think publicly releasing the source code for voting machine that are capable of being compromised by people who have the source code is a good idea.

leftlane4passing said:

---

Artorias said:

---

Until they allow their software to be audited, I don't give two ****s what he has to say. How can anyone possibly trust election results when nobody can look at the code of the software that is counting the results?

---

You're right, I think publicly releasing the source code for voting machine that are capable of being compromised by people who have the source code is a good idea.

---

How about we just go back to paper ballots hand counted? There's zero reason to use electronic voting. Its ******ed.

Pookers said:

---

leftlane4passing said:

---

Artorias said:

---

Until they allow their software to be audited, I don't give two ****s what he has to say. How can anyone possibly trust election results when nobody can look at the code of the software that is counting the results?

---

You're right, I think publicly releasing the source code for voting machine that are capable of being compromised by people who have the source code is a good idea.

---

How about we just go back to paper ballots hand counted? There's zero reason to use electronic voting. Its ******ed.

---

People would find issue with that too, it is a system that can never be perfect. We have poll workers and other ways to try and ensure election integrity. What else would you recommend be done?

leftlane4passing said:

---

Pookers said:

---

leftlane4passing said:

---

Artorias said:

---

Until they allow their software to be audited, I don't give two ****s what he has to say. How can anyone possibly trust election results when nobody can look at the code of the software that is counting the results?

---

You're right, I think publicly releasing the source code for voting machine that are capable of being compromised by people who have the source code is a good idea.

---

How about we just go back to paper ballots hand counted? There's zero reason to use electronic voting. Its ******ed.

---

People would find issue with that too, it is a system that can never be perfect. We have poll workers and other ways to try and ensure election integrity. What else would you recommend be done?

---

Paper ballots hand counted in rooms that are monitored, recorded, and streamed online. Electronic voting introduces way more problems then it supposedly solves. The amount of money spent on them is quite high as well and returning to paper ballots would probably be cheaper.

Imagine shilling for paper ballots when they are already used. LOL!

Then imagine the cognitive dissonance that takes place when the shills are exposed to the fact that hand counts are less reliable than electronic.

Would you be surprised to learn that the vast majority of Americans vote on paper ballots? Over 90%.

Texas is one of the few states that still has direct electronic voting, but we're mostly BMD paper.

Whistle Pig said:

---

Would you be surprised to learn that the vast majority of Americans vote on paper ballots? Over 90%.

Texas is one of the few states that still has direct electronic voting, but we're mostly BMD paper.

---

Exactly why MIB created this horror of a dementia president.