Whistle Pig said:
Quote:
So now we are parsing "marked classified" with true classified?
It matters greatly in this case because it was subject to subpoena. Read the thread. FKA FTC was completely unaware.
If you have a theory for an "innocent explanation" I'd love to hear it.
No this is an utter and absolute LIE. You do NOT get to speak for me and do NOT get to make assumptions about this.
Marked classified is essentially meaning less. I know your side loves to parse language so lets go down this little piglet hole.
Hillary claimed she did nothing wrong with her bathroom email server because she says the emails were not "marked classified" even though they contained sensitive, top secret, classified information, etc. Some contained information within the email marked as classified with a "(c)" even though proper systems and headers were not used. Hillary thought these were just paragraph markings for a series of points (as in a), b), c), etc).
So Hillary can claim she had no classified information on the email server, even though she should have known the information was classified, and even had classified markings within the emails but she claims stupidity... as the Secretary of State... to not know what the markings meant.
As stated over and over again, markings do NOT make it classified. It gives an indication as to status. It is possible to have classified information that is not marked. This happens if someone tells you something classified, then you verbally share that with another person who is not authorized, you have broken the law regarding classified information and literally NO MARKINGS were involved.
You seem hell bent on trying to catch me in some sort of lie or misrepresentation. Go for it. I am as honest as it comes. I do not lie, cheat or steal and I do NOT tolerate those who do.
No run along and go wallow around in the swamp of slop and **** you live in lil piggy. Go on.