7 pages in three days - "doth protesting too much" about how little they care.
6.5 pages of you and your lil cabal spouting nothing but lies. There could be a discussion if you took a legitimate interest in the topic and not reposting what arrives in your inbox from your Brian Stelter fan club.Whistle Pig said:
7 pages in three days - "doth protesting too much" about how little they care.
Just did.Whistle Pig said:
Where have I lied on this thread? I haven't.
Did not you post that Trump's lawyer lied like it was a stated fact?Whistle Pig said:
Where have I lied on this thread? I haven't.
Quote:
Did not you post that Trump's lawyer lied like it was a stated fact?
Whistle Pig said:
Where have I lied on this thread? I haven't.
Has that proven in a court of law?Whistle Pig said:Quote:
Did not you post that Trump's lawyer lied like it was a stated fact?
Yes but I didn't say which one. It was probably Evan Corcoran that prepared the false statement.
marxists just need you to show them the person and then they'll find the crime.dermdoc said:Has that. Been proven in a court of law?Whistle Pig said:Quote:
Did not you post that Trump's lawyer lied like it was a stated fact?
Yes but I didn't say which one. It was probably Evan Corcoran that prepared the false statement.
And if so, has there been sentencing?
Do you believe people are innocent until proven guilty?
Whistle Pig said:
7 pages in three days - "doth protesting too much" about how little they care.
Were you lying when you said you knew Trump's lawyer was lying?Whistle Pig said:
Due process doesn't apply to our thoughts and discourse. What a silly test you invented, that no fact in the world can be known unless it's litigated in courtroom.
You have nothing to support your opinion stated as fact. Multiple folks have indicated the lawyer did not lie. We know they didn't as they would have already been perp walked.Whistle Pig said:
Due process doesn't apply to our thoughts and discourse. What a silly test you invented, that no fact in the world can be known unless it's litigated in courtroom.
And it is not about due process.Whistle Pig said:
Due process doesn't apply to our thoughts and discourse. What a silly test you invented, that no fact in the world can be known unless it's litigated in courtroom.
Then why is there any crime in America? In your fantasy, a judge can issue a warrant on the FBI's muh feelz but not be specific as to the crime and who was supposed to have committed the crime,Whistle Pig said:
That's literally how search warrants work. Happens every day. A judge agreed evidence of a crime is likely to be found.
So it had been proven? Or is that what you believe?Whistle Pig said:
It's the truth. The statement has falsehoods and tricking Bobb into signing it is no better. It was designed and presented to mislead.
I know how it works.Whistle Pig said:
What are you talking about? Specific statues were cited in the warrant affidavit. Do you have a problem with search warrants in general or are you just having difficulty understanding how anything works?
Quote:
And if so, where is the indictment?
So you have zero proof of what you stated as fact, that Trump's lawyer lied?Whistle Pig said:Quote:
And if so, where is the indictment?
Trump has done a good job slowing down the investigation. The criminal investigation is barred from reviewing most of the documents(except the classified ones) for the time being.
All non-classified documents are NOT subject to any criminal prosecution...those would be PRA violations, which are civil issues...Whistle Pig said:Quote:
And if so, where is the indictment?
Trump has done a good job slowing down the investigation. The criminal investigation is barred from reviewing most of the documents(except the classified ones) for the time being.
He's not an attorney. He's a sock...and not of an attorney.dermdoc said:And it is not about due process.Whistle Pig said:
Due process doesn't apply to our thoughts and discourse. What a silly test you invented, that no fact in the world can be known unless it's litigated in courtroom.
It is about making a statement as a fact that you do not know is true.
If I say, it is a fact Obama lied about Benghazi, I would be lying, correct? Now if I said I believe Obama was lying about Benghazi then I am not lying and merely stating my opinion.
You sure operate a lot on emotions and bias for an attorney.
Oh I know. No lawyer would mis speak like he has.Ag with kids said:He's not an attorney. He's a sock...and not of an attorney.dermdoc said:And it is not about due process.Whistle Pig said:
Due process doesn't apply to our thoughts and discourse. What a silly test you invented, that no fact in the world can be known unless it's litigated in courtroom.
It is about making a statement as a fact that you do not know is true.
If I say, it is a fact Obama lied about Benghazi, I would be lying, correct? Now if I said I believe Obama was lying about Benghazi then I am not lying and merely stating my opinion.
You sure operate a lot on emotions and bias for an attorney.
Piggy, I have a lot more experience in life and on these topics than you do, and likely ever will.Whistle Pig said:
What are you talking about? Specific statues were cited in the warrant affidavit. Do you have a problem with search warrants in general or are you just having difficulty understanding how anything works?
So you BELIEVE that Trump's lawyer lied.Whistle Pig said:
The statement represents that no documents marked classified remain. The FBI seized documents marked classified. I've seen the picture.
That is strong evidence, overwhelming, that the representation was false. And no innocent explanation has even been floated.
Many of the folders were empty. Classified markings do not determine whether information contained within is classified. Trump had ABSOLUTE authority to declassify, and no procedure has to be followed. He merely has to think it declassified (Source: US Constitution and SCOTUS Ruling NAvy v Egan).Whistle Pig said:
The statement represents that no documents marked classified remain. The FBI seized documents marked classified. I've seen the picture.
That is strong evidence, overwhelming, that the representation was false. And no innocent explanation has even been floated.
I just want him to be honest.fka ftc said:Piggy, I have a lot more experience in life and on these topics than you do, and likely ever will.Whistle Pig said:
What are you talking about? Specific statues were cited in the warrant affidavit. Do you have a problem with search warrants in general or are you just having difficulty understanding how anything works?
You seem to think you can spout your nonsense about his lawyers going to jail as fact and as some sort of basis to justify your TDS. In the real world, your statements would be libelous and there would be repercussions. On an internet forum, you are offered anonymity and some protection.
And it is NOT how search warrants work. I laid out an example of how your fantasy would apply to a housing project. In typical lib fashion, you avoid the discussion and try and work a veiled ad hominem in there.
I don't get my validation from your comments, post counts, star counts, or bragging to my "boyz" over soy lattes about how I "owned this dude on TexAgs".
I genuinely like the discussion on this forum and on this topic. My perception is that you are just hear to be antagonistic to other posters. And many of us are politely asking you to cut it out.
This has been explained earlier in the thread.Whistle Pig said:
It's the truth. The statement has falsehoods and tricking Bobb into signing it is no better. It was designed and presented to mislead.