Canadian farmers on deck; Trudeau moving forward with 30% fertilizer reduction

13,159 Views | 149 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by titan
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trudeau needs a Mussolini ending.
“My philopsophy is this: Its none of my business what people say of me or think of me. I am what I am and I do what I do. I expect nothing and accept everything. And it makes life so much easier." ~ Sir Anthony Hopkins
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Shut down every golf course. There is no producer on earth that can afford the rate of application that goes on at a golf course. A farmer will fertilize at a rate to produce 200 to 300 bushels of corn per acre. Golf course rates are at 1,500 to 3,500 bushels per acre. In some cases rates will exceed, just depends if the golf course can keep the water poured on it. .... Oh yeah,....water..

Then let's see if the Greenies really want to go down this road. Take away the golf courses? That just might hit a nerve. No one is talking about these users, are they?
This is your original statement..you clearly stated that farmers fertilize to PRODUCE 200-300 bushels of corn per acre. You then state that golf courses fertilize at rates to produce 1,500 to 3,500 bushels per acre. Correct?

I stated that golf courses do not fertilize to produce a yield rate. The harvest of grass clippings is not measured. Ever.

I asked you to support your claim with some sort of link to support your claim and it seems to have ruffled your feathers. That's on you.

Most golf courses fertilize their greens in the range of 6-12 lbs N/1000 per year. The greens typically are 4.5 acres total, per course. Fairways are typically 2-3 lbs N/1000 and encompass roughly 50 acres. It's ruled by economics, not Agronomy.

Since all you can do is spout anger and toot your own horn, I'll consider this conversation over as you won't provide any data to support your original assertion. You also fail to realize that golf is an industry just as farming is an industry. We create jobs, pay taxes and provide a service of recreation to our customers. You obviously have a bias against golf. That's fine as everyone has a right to an opinion. Why don't you include all recreational sports turf in your rants? Baseball fields? Football? Soccer? Cricket? Polo?

And I had Dr Hons.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Funky Winkerbean said:

Or just old fashioned incompetence.
How can you deliberately do the wrong thing so bluntly and directly after having a failed example right in front of you? White Star Lines tried to fix Titanic's sister-ship after she sank -- they didn't just go ahead and repeat the mistakes --- but Trudeau and Holland seem to be doing what Sri Lanka did.

And no, not naive - -that's why presupposed it has a criminal intent like money laundering and redistribution.What leaving some doubt on is the degree of malevolence. Like annie said, there's nothing preventing that outcome if that is what really up to.

Edit:
I see the above mixes two posters. To clarify,

Funky,
Can you explain how this could be something as `benign' as incompetence when the red-flags are so obvious? If it means maybe leaving by a window, why would an official push ahead with it.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Funky,

Can you explain how this could be something as `benign' as incompetence when the red-flags are so obvious? If it means maybe leaving by a window, why would an official push ahead with it.
I'm also of the opinion there is some sort of coordination given the similarities in the behavior of the participating nations, but simple incompetence is still a possibility until more information can be pulled out. As far as why would they push ahead, they simply don't care about the consequences of their actions and their arrogance has them convinced their ideas are what's best.
Farmer @ Johnsongrass, TX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Funky Winkerbean said:

Quote:

Shut down every golf course. There is no producer on earth that can afford the rate of application that goes on at a golf course. A farmer will fertilize at a rate to produce 200 to 300 bushels of corn per acre. Golf course rates are at 1,500 to 3,500 bushels per acre. In some cases rates will exceed, just depends if the golf course can keep the water poured on it. .... Oh yeah,....water..

Then let's see if the Greenies really want to go down this road. Take away the golf courses? That just might hit a nerve. No one is talking about these users, are they?
This is your original statement..you clearly stated that farmers fertilize to PRODUCE 200-300 bushels of corn per acre. You then state that golf courses fertilize at rates to produce 1,500 to 3,500 bushels per acre. Correct?

I stated that golf courses do not fertilize to produce a yield rate. The harvest of grass clippings is not measured. Ever.

I asked you to support your claim with some sort of link to support your claim and it seems to have ruffled your feathers. That's on you.

Most golf courses fertilize their greens in the range of 6-12 lbs N/1000 per year. The greens typically are 4.5 acres total, per course. Fairways are typically 2-3 lbs N/1000 and encompass roughly 50 acres. It's ruled by economics, not Agronomy.

Since all you can do is spout anger and toot your own horn, I'll consider this conversation over as you won't provide any data to support your original assertion. You also fail to realize that golf is an industry just as farming is an industry. We create jobs, pay taxes and provide a service of recreation to our customers. You obviously have a bias against golf. That's fine as everyone has a right to an opinion. Why don't you include all recreational sports turf in your rants? Baseball fields? Football? Soccer? Cricket? Polo?

And I had Dr Hons.
Farmers in Central TX alone will fertilize corn to produce 100 bu/ac at a rate (your units) of 3.2 lbs N/1000.
Okay, 3.2 lbs is what relation/rate/percent of 6-12 lbs N/1000? Let's see, the farm appears to be half/50% vs the golf course rate. Or, another way to state the same info is, the golf course is double to quadruple the farm rate, or your golf course is applying at a "rate" of 200 to ~400 bu/ac. Are you catching on yet? These are your numbers converted to a bushels/ac relationship. (Note: "Rate" is the operative word. Had you read that in my original post you would have gone down your path.) ... I don't know your golf course location and really not interested, other courses will be using rates higher than your stated rate. And, if those courses have the water to flush, they do it. (Note: "water" was a another key word you missed.) I have no concern if you have issues with a farm being 10,000 acres and a golf course being less that 40 acres, we are addressing "rate" based on over use and misapplication of synthetic fertilizers from richardag's post.

You come out swinging from the start making this personal - posting I don't know what I'm talking about, telling me to stay in my lane. You state golf courses don't manage to a desired yield. I never said they did, but you assume a lot. Then you follow up telling me how you are degreed qualified to speak on the subject. Last, you take to the soap box trying to portend the greatness of golf, its jobs and taxes paid, are something I overlooked and why not pick on other sports. I "countered" responded to each of your arguments and then you finish this debate by posting that I am angry, toot my own horn, ruffled feathers, etc. I only responded to your statements. I think you need to look in the mirror, and ask yourself if you jumped in too quick, assumed a lot, and could not compute what message was being conveyed.

You never answered my original question - How do you know that I don't know[?]....because you can't. You already knew that, but would not admit it. However, you did meander around multiple topics that had some relation to the original statement and I enjoyed that.

By the way,...if you want to discuss the amount of "water used to irrigate" U.S. golf courses and instead use that amount of water to irrigate the U.S. corn crop, I can convey to you how the U.S. Corn Supply/Demand would be impacted (yield) and the price impact to the U.S. farmer, retail consumer and international markets. Not sayin'...just sayin'.. (toot! toot!)

Ever catch a cup of runoff from a golf course and have a water lab test it?

Dr. Hons, good man.

You're right, this conversation is over.

Adios!

Oyster DuPree
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What should you do if your round of golf is interrupted by a lightning storm?

Walk around holding your 1-iron above your head, because even God can't hit a 1-iron. Lol
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You are a real POS..it's been you slinging the language and insults the entire time. All I asked for is for you to support your claim and you started insulting me. The thread doesn't lie.
AlaskanAg99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
One reason countries may feel it's 'safe' to do this is because if they fail, they probably assume they can simply buy grain on the open market. And that's why Biden should flat out say, there will be no increased grain or protien shipments beyond prior years shipments. You get what you get. BUT, wait there's more, the US will insure it's population is fed before ANY other countries are considered.

Given the massive global shortfalls this Sept, that ought to put fear into those making these decisions.

But that only works if they care, which I doubt.
Farmer @ Johnsongrass, TX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Funky Winkerbean said:

You are a real POS..it's been you slinging the language and insults the entire time. All I asked for is for you to support your claim and you started insulting me. The thread doesn't lie.
Yes. The thread doesn't lie. Totally agree.

I started insulting? You accused me of not knowing what I was talking about.

This is your first reply to me (Page 4)
Quote:

You don't know what you're talking about in regards to golf courses. Stay in your lane.

^^^^ That's a compliment? Where's the support for that?

I asked you how you would know that I don't know what I am talking about and you fell into an abyss at that moment.

And now,...I'm a real POS? For what? Using facts?

Dude chill. Everyone gets their turn in a barrel or their tit in a ringer.

Seriously. I'm done now.


titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Funky Winkerbean said:

Quote:

Funky,

Can you explain how this could be something as `benign' as incompetence when the red-flags are so obvious? If it means maybe leaving by a window, why would an official push ahead with it.
I'm also of the opinion there is some sort of coordination given the similarities in the behavior of the participating nations, but simple incompetence is still a possibility until more information can be pulled out. As far as why would they push ahead, they simply don't care about the consequences of their actions and their arrogance has them convinced their ideas are what's best.
Thanks. So that it is a coordinated malevolent thing is a definite possibility. You are suggesting a form of `simultaneous incompetence' which actually sounds a bit greater a leap. Yes, it comes down to the at least to-date lack of consequence (Sri Lanka excepted).
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.