Roe out, question is who leaked???

103,395 Views | 1094 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Agthatbuilds
Slyfox07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BenFiasco14 said:

How am I supposed to get any work done with the liberal tears pouring out like a damn fire hose Today


The struggle is real!
WHOOP!'91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
black_ice said:

I have noted all apologies to my black leather bound notebook.
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BenFiasco14 said:

How am I supposed to get any work done with the liberal tears pouring out like a damn fire hose Today
QFT
You do not have a soul. You are a soul that has a body.

We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
Kozmozag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Blue states will pay red state birthing people to come to their state and kill their babies.
All I do is Nguyen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'd like to think that hopefully by releasing the draft in hopes of pressuring some justices to change their vote, it only hardens their convictions and the votes stay the same.

It may be just wishful thinking, but one can hope.
No matter what!
Epstein didn't do, you know, the thing...
I'm the rare Astros/Cowboys/Spurs fan. We do exist
ThunderCougarFalconBird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TxTarpon said:


perhaps. Rumors I've seen speculate that it wasn't someone as closely tied to a justice but instead someone that happened to have access to the draft. Some other type of staffer that saw it, didn't like it, and went to the press. If it was this Jain guy, he may have laundered it a bit.
Nitro Power
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
My stance on abortion has changed dramatically. I never agreed or supported it, but thought that was a decision with consequences to be sorted out between God and the individual. However with the way the leftist have been codifying legalized baby murder (infanticide), I say ban it. All of it. I understand there are certain situations where it might be necessary, but the stats are so astronomically low, it's not worth trying to define such subjective situations.
The Collective
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TxTarpon said:




You can't convince me the origin of this tweet isn't the Outdoors board.
Texaggie7nine
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Probably not a smart move for that guy to tweet out an actual name, not knowing anything for certain. Things like this can bring out some bad characters that will target people on a whim of suspicion.
7nine
black_ice
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Texaggie7nine said:

Probably not a smart move for that guy to tweet out an actual name, not knowing anything for certain. Things like this can bring out some bad characters that will target people on a whim of suspicion.


Agreed. Emotions are spilling over. This is exactly the type of issue that will bring out the mentally unhinged.
The Collective
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agree. Not a fan of just throwing someone's name out there on such a whim.
powerbelly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Texaggie7nine said:

Probably not a smart move for that guy to tweet out an actual name, not knowing anything for certain. Things like this can bring out some bad characters that will target people on a whim of suspicion.
I have a feeling there is more known than is said in that tweet. Probably not enough to go to press at a real news agency, but it is not exactly a secret.
The Debt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
black_ice said:

Texaggie7nine said:

Probably not a smart move for that guy to tweet out an actual name, not knowing anything for certain. Things like this can bring out some bad characters that will target people on a whim of suspicion.


Agreed. Emotions are spilling over. This is exactly the type of issue that will bring out the mentally unhinged.

Waaah someone named names. That's so irresponsible.

After 4 years of russian collusion lies and ukrainian phone call lies.

The left can burn in Hell.
Nitro Power
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Modern day lefties are by very definition, mentally unhinged. This just gives them something to rally around for now. If it wasn't this it would be something else that they want to push on the populace.
black_ice
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Debt said:

black_ice said:

Texaggie7nine said:

Probably not a smart move for that guy to tweet out an actual name, not knowing anything for certain. Things like this can bring out some bad characters that will target people on a whim of suspicion.


Agreed. Emotions are spilling over. This is exactly the type of issue that will bring out the mentally unhinged.

Waaah someone named names. That's so irresponsible.

After 4 years of russian collusion lies and ukrainian phone call lies.

The left can burn in Hell.


Lol bro calm down.

Whoever leaked should be beaten publicly and placed into a hard labor camp. But get the right person.
black_ice
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Agreed. Libs are literally NPC's.
Slyfox07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Nitro Power said:

My stance on abortion has changed dramatically. I never agreed or supported it, but thought that was a decision with consequences to be sorted out between God and the individual. However with the way the leftist have been codifying legalized baby murder (infanticide), I say ban it. All of it. I understand there are certain situations where it might be necessary, but the stats are so astronomically low, it's not worth trying to define such subjective situations.


That's fine, but a national ban on abortion would be a much more extreme position than what overturning Roe will accomplish.

That's what's hilarious about this. Leftists in California and Oregon and NYC will see no impact on their ability to kill babies at all. They just can't tell you what to do in Texas and Florida anymore...and they're losing their minds over it
JohnnyStatueNow
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stole this from Rocky. It was too good not to post.

Olin's Illegitimate Son That He Doesn't Know About
Keegan99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ThunderCougarFalconBird said:

TxTarpon said:


perhaps. Rumors I've seen speculate that it wasn't someone as closely tied to a justice but instead someone that happened to have access to the draft. Some other type of staffer that saw it, didn't like it, and went to the press. If it was this Jain guy, he may have laundered it a bit.


Link to the rumors you've seen?
Emotional Support Cobra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
black_ice said:

Texaggie7nine said:

Probably not a smart move for that guy to tweet out an actual name, not knowing anything for certain. Things like this can bring out some bad characters that will target people on a whim of suspicion.


Agreed. Emotions are spilling over. This is exactly the type of issue that will bring out the mentally unhinged.


I offer my professional *free hugs* cobra cuddle services to all leftists.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Deplorable
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ack
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:


Might be headed for another "The Supreme Court has ruled, now let them enforce it."
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well Sotomeyer leaked good news.
Keegan99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Huh? The states will enforce their laws. In Texas, that means those performing abortions will be arrested.
Keegan99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Link?
The Debt
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Replacement theory on full display.
Secolobo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TxAgPreacher
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
God bless America!
Sims
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

will25u said:


Might be headed for another "The Supreme Court has ruled, now let them enforce it."
"Reproductive rights." What a misnomer and intentionally so. They're literally saying terminating the reproductive process is a reproductive right. It's like saying the the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness should be inclusive of the rights to kill, enslave and torture.
Fightin_Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TxTarpon said:


Ties to the wise Latina?

This is my shocked face (lol poors)
The world needs mean tweets

My Pronouns Ultra and MAGA

Trump 2024
BenFiasco14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"Gender Policy Council"

I can smell that "council" from here
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
Get Off My Lawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pole Assassin said:

Nitro Power said:

My stance on abortion has changed dramatically. I never agreed or supported it, but thought that was a decision with consequences to be sorted out between God and the individual. However with the way the leftist have been codifying legalized baby murder (infanticide), I say ban it. All of it. I understand there are certain situations where it might be necessary, but the stats are so astronomically low, it's not worth trying to define such subjective situations.


That's fine, but a national ban on abortion would be a much more extreme position than what overturning Roe will accomplish.

That's what's hilarious about this. Leftists in California and Oregon and NYC will see no impact on their ability to kill babies at all. They just can't tell you what to do in Texas and Florida anymore...and they're losing their minds over it
Because they are godless and instead derive their morality from legality. Introducing legal asymmetry exposes the weakness of their position and immediately condemns those who have had abortions (directly for those in red states and indirectly for those in blue states).

(Side note; the fact that a Mississippi law challenges a Komifornian's moral standing betrays that they are fundamentally "nationalists" who don't "think globally" or consider the "international community" at their core. If they did, they'd already have grappled with the issue of legal disparities across borders.)
Sully Dog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Martin Cash said:

This excerpt from Yahoo News sums up the whole problem and the fallacy of the pro-abortion argument:

Quote:

women across the country may find they have lost the right choose how or when they are pregnant.

It's not how and when you get pregnant, it's how and when you get un-pregnant.
These people must not know how to have sex
Deplorable Neanderthal Clinger
Sully Dog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GeorgiAg said:

CanyonAg77 said:

Condoms are cheaper than abortion. Saying "no" is free.

Even the poorest and dumbest out there realize unprotected sex leads to babies. If abortion is taken away, they will switch birth control methods.

I have no idea why you persist with the assertion that people cannot change behavior


You were a teenager? Do you remember what it was like? Dumb and full of hormones.
I remember not getting anyone pregnant.
Deplorable Neanderthal Clinger
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.