Charpie said:

---

There is no follow up to that tweet. He's a political strategist. I mean, who is he and how does he know?

---

They put it on their website. They also plan on sky screaming in Catholic Churches on Sunday.

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/may/5/ruth-sent-us-activists-plan-abortion-protests-chur/

Quote:

---

Pro-choice activists are planning protests in churches on Mother's Day and are preparing visits to Supreme Court justices' homes next week to express anger over an anticipated ruling overturning legalized abortion.

The activist group "Ruth Sent Us," named for the late liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, is challenging people to protest inside a Catholic Church on Sunday and it published a map purporting to show Republican-appointed justices' homes for a "Walk-by Wednesday" demonstration.

"Whether you're a 'Catholic for Choice,' ex-Catholic, of other or no faith, recognize that six extremist Catholics set out to overturn Roe," the group said on Twitter. "Stand at or in a local Catholic Church on Sun May 8. #WarOnWomen #MothersDayStrike."

The group published locations for three of the justices in Virginia and three of the justices in Maryland in a map embedded on its website. The "extremist justices" targeted by the activists include Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito, Amy Coney Barrett, Brett Kavanaugh, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas.

Not all of the targeted justices are Catholic and at least one of them may not be on board with the leaked draft opinion overturning legalized abortion.
…
The activists, however, believe protesting at churches and at the justices' homes is in keeping with their beliefs of "Women Deserve Trust," "Black Lives Matter," "Love is Love," and "No Human Is Illegal."

"Our 6-3 extremist Supreme Court routinely issues rulings that hurt women, racial minorities, LGBTQ+ and immigrant rights," the group said on its website. "We must rise up to force accountability using a diversity of tactics."

---

They need to do some sky screaming (WTF that is) at POTATUS & pelosi's place while they're at it. Since they're such good Catholics and all. That'll change everybody's mind for sure.

The new "Sky Screamers" of 2022 have emerged! https://t.co/dFBmyHEQ6z pic.twitter.com/EGRUZNmx0i

— @2000Mules (@Peter_Jongsma) May 3, 2022

Thanks. As stupid as I imagined it to be, they still managed to exceed my expectations.

I'm going to pray that the sky screams back.

Difficult to watch... This is how some people feel about aborted babies. Absolutely evil and sickening. Pay attention when they tell you what they really think. pic.twitter.com/0KTTHYG4qK

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) April 28, 2022

Que Te Gusta Mas said:

---

The new "Sky Screamers" of 2022 have emerged! https://t.co/dFBmyHEQ6z pic.twitter.com/EGRUZNmx0i

— @2000Mules (@Peter_Jongsma) May 3, 2022

---

Now where have I seen this before? Oh yeah -- spoiled kids at Walmart throwing a fit for a toy mama says they can't have.

BREAKING: The cowardly Justice Samuel Alito cancels his appearance at a judicial conference tomorrow after his disgusting Supreme Court opinion overturning Roe v. Wade leaked to the American public. RT IF YOU THINK THAT HE SHOULD BE IMPEACHED!

— Occupy Democrats (@OccupyDemocrats) May 5, 2022

Que Te Gusta Mas said:

---

BREAKING: The cowardly Justice Samuel Alito cancels his appearance at a judicial conference tomorrow after his disgusting Supreme Court opinion overturning Roe v. Wade leaked to the American public. RT IF YOU THINK THAT HE SHOULD BE IMPEACHED!

— Occupy Democrats (@OccupyDemocrats) May 5, 2022

---

Why should he be impeached?

FriscoKid said:

---

Where is Petro?

---

Still here. Unfortunate decision that is going to backfire on the religious conservatives and result in a lot of democratic mobilization going forward. In the meanwhile, those who can afford to travel will still have abortion access, and the rest will rely on abortion pills obtained legally or illegally.

PetroAg87 said:

---

FriscoKid said:

---

Where is Petro?

---

Still here. Unfortunate decision that is going to backfire on the religious conservatives and result in a lot of democratic mobilization going forward. In the meanwhile, those who can afford to travel will still have abortion access, and the rest will rely on abortion pills obtained legally or illegally.

---

Or how about they take steps to not get pregnant since they know abortion is less available???

aginlakeway said:

---

PetroAg87 said:

---

FriscoKid said:

---

Where is Petro?

---

Still here. Unfortunate decision that is going to backfire on the religious conservatives and result in a lot of democratic mobilization going forward. In the meanwhile, those who can afford to travel will still have abortion access, and the rest will rely on abortion pills obtained legally or illegally.

---

Or how about they take steps to not get pregnant since they know abortion is less available???

---

Always better to avoid pregnancy in the first place! But of course the Texas law makes no exception for those women who did not choose to have sex or become pregnant.

BLSD said:

---

PetroAg87 said:

---

FriscoKid said:

---

Where is Petro?

---

Still here. Unfortunate decision that is going to backfire on the religious conservatives and result in a lot of democratic mobilization going forward. In the meanwhile, those who can afford to travel will still have abortion access, and the rest will rely on abortion pills obtained legally or illegally.

---

You keep making up **** and believing it, this country is fed up with the baby killing left…..we're pickin a fight and we'll win.

---

Not making up anything. The majority of Americans support varying levels of abortion legality. Abortion will NOT become illegal in all states if Roe v Wade is overturned, meaning women who can afford to travel to will continue to have abortion access. And the usage of abortion pills continues to grow, and will do so even more when other abortion options don't exist.

And even the most hardcore anti-abortion activists know that the Democrats are going to use this decision as a way to fire up their members. As far as whether you'll "win", I don't believe for a second that you will. The only question is simply how long it will take for all American women to regain their bodily freedom and abortion rights.

PetroAg87 said:

---

BLSD said:

---

PetroAg87 said:

---

FriscoKid said:

---

Where is Petro?

---

Still here. Unfortunate decision that is going to backfire on the religious conservatives and result in a lot of democratic mobilization going forward. In the meanwhile, those who can afford to travel will still have abortion access, and the rest will rely on abortion pills obtained legally or illegally.

---

You keep making up **** and believing it, this country is fed up with the baby killing left…..we're pickin a fight and we'll win.

---

Not making up anything. The majority of Americans support varying levels of abortion legality. Abortion will NOT become illegal in all states if Roe v Wade is overturned, meaning women who can afford to travel to will continue to have abortion access. And the usage of abortion pills continues to grow, and will do so even more when other abortion options don't exist.

And even the most hardcore anti-abortion activists know that the Democrats are going to use this decision as a way to fire up their members. As far as whether you'll "win", I don't believe for a second that you will. The only question is simply how long it will take for all American women to regain their bodily freedom and abortion rights.

---

The degenerates will lose. Plain and simple.

PetroAg87 said:

---

FriscoKid said:

---

Where is Petro?

---

Still here. Unfortunate decision that is going to backfire on the religious conservatives and result in a lot of democratic mobilization going forward. In the meanwhile, those who can afford to travel will still have abortion access, and the rest will rely on abortion pills obtained legally or illegally.

---

If by backfire you mean the lives of many babies will be saved, then I agree with you.

Boo Weekley said:

---

backintexas2013 said:

---

Some of the same people upset about this were all in on the vaccine mandate. Wow.

---

SOME?

I don't recall hearing a single peep from any GD liberal I know in favor of "my body my choice" back when many of us were being forced to get vaccines or get fired (I made a fake lolz). They virtually all supported it and don't let them say otherwise now, in hindsight.

In fact, I remember Rasmussen polls just months ago revealing that nearly half of them supported forced internment of the unvaxxed, as well as loss of custody of children.

They are only "my body my choice" when it comes to destroying the separate body inside them.

F em all.

---

I recall plenty of CMs and libs that post here being against forced vaccination. In fact I can't think of any who were In favor of it.

There's what, less than 10 CMs and libs who post regularly on F16?

The poster most in favor if it was a conservative, military type as I recall (Salute the Marines). I remember Rasmussen polls just months ago saying he was 100% in favor of those soldiers being dishonorably discharged.

Since it's easier to recall one's own posts rather than those that disprove them, I'll help you out.

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3245768/replies/60654922#60654922
(11/21)

Quote:

---

. . . On the virus I'm vaccinated, but only mask up when required by businesses. I worked in the office apart from one week during the pandemic. We socially distanced, but went back to restaurants when they opened. I don't think people should be forced to be vaccinated. . .

---

So there's 10% of the libs there. I'm too lazy to check on the other 7-8 (and I'm not entirely confident I could name that many) but I've already shown your memory to be selective and lacking any desire to find even one F16 lib to quote as far as forcing the vax on you.

I'd be happy to let you show otherwise. [/see what I did there]

Shakes fist at F16 libs regardless, because of the principle of the matter.

PetroAg87 said:

---

aginlakeway said:

---

PetroAg87 said:

---

FriscoKid said:

---

Where is Petro?

---

Still here. Unfortunate decision that is going to backfire on the religious conservatives and result in a lot of democratic mobilization going forward. In the meanwhile, those who can afford to travel will still have abortion access, and the rest will rely on abortion pills obtained legally or illegally.

---

Or how about they take steps to not get pregnant since they know abortion is less available???

---

Always better to avoid pregnancy in the first place! But of course the Texas law makes no exception for those women who did not choose to have sex or become pregnant.

---

Ok. But again, if you know that's the law and that an abortion will be tough to get, why not avoid getting pregnant? It's not hard to avoid. It's your choice to have sex.

I believe more in personal responsibility than government intervention after the fact. Don't you?

PetroAg87 said:

---

BLSD said:

---

PetroAg87 said:

---

FriscoKid said:

---

Where is Petro?

---

Still here. Unfortunate decision that is going to backfire on the religious conservatives and result in a lot of democratic mobilization going forward. In the meanwhile, those who can afford to travel will still have abortion access, and the rest will rely on abortion pills obtained legally or illegally.

---

You keep making up **** and believing it, this country is fed up with the baby killing left…..we're pickin a fight and we'll win.

---

Not making up anything. The majority of Americans support varying levels of abortion legality. Abortion will NOT become illegal in all states if Roe v Wade is overturned, meaning women who can afford to travel to will continue to have abortion access. And the usage of abortion pills continues to grow, and will do so even more when other abortion options don't exist.

And even the most hardcore anti-abortion activists know that the Democrats are going to use this decision as a way to fire up their members. As far as whether you'll "win", I don't believe for a second that you will. The only question is simply how long it will take for all American women to regain their bodily freedom and abortion rights.

---

Who cares about the Democrats. I care about babies. Don't you?

PetroAg87 said:

---

BLSD said:

---

PetroAg87 said:

---

FriscoKid said:

---

Where is Petro?

---

Still here. Unfortunate decision that is going to backfire on the religious conservatives and result in a lot of democratic mobilization going forward. In the meanwhile, those who can afford to travel will still have abortion access, and the rest will rely on abortion pills obtained legally or illegally.

---

You keep making up **** and believing it, this country is fed up with the baby killing left…..we're pickin a fight and we'll win.

---

Not making up anything. The majority of Americans support varying levels of abortion legality. Abortion will NOT become illegal in all states if Roe v Wade is overturned, meaning women who can afford to travel to will continue to have abortion access. And the usage of abortion pills continues to grow, and will do so even more when other abortion options don't exist.

And even the most hardcore anti-abortion activists know that the Democrats are going to use this decision as a way to fire up their members. As far as whether you'll "win", I don't believe for a second that you will. The only question is simply how long it will take for all American women to regain their bodily freedom and abortion rights.

---

What rights?

PetroAg87 said:

---

BLSD said:

---

PetroAg87 said:

---

FriscoKid said:

---

Where is Petro?

---

Still here. Unfortunate decision that is going to backfire on the religious conservatives and result in a lot of democratic mobilization going forward. In the meanwhile, those who can afford to travel will still have abortion access, and the rest will rely on abortion pills obtained legally or illegally.

---

You keep making up **** and believing it, this country is fed up with the baby killing left…..we're pickin a fight and we'll win.

---

Not making up anything. The majority of Americans support varying levels of abortion legality. Abortion will NOT become illegal in all states if Roe v Wade is overturned, meaning women who can afford to travel to will continue to have abortion access. And the usage of abortion pills continues to grow, and will do so even more when other abortion options don't exist.

And even the most hardcore anti-abortion activists know that the Democrats are going to use this decision as a way to fire up their members. As far as whether you'll "win", I don't believe for a second that you will. The only question is simply how long it will take for all American women to regain their bodily freedom and abortion rights.

---

A majority of Americans have never read Roe, don't know what "Casey" refers to, and...don't care about abortion.



Of those who do care, it's been slowly trending to much more restrictions on it, with a plurality favoring either no abortions or restricted. That is...what overturning Roe will produce.

PetroAg87 said:

---

BLSD said:

---

PetroAg87 said:

---

FriscoKid said:

---

Where is Petro?

---

Still here. Unfortunate decision that is going to backfire on the religious conservatives and result in a lot of democratic mobilization going forward. In the meanwhile, those who can afford to travel will still have abortion access, and the rest will rely on abortion pills obtained legally or illegally.

---

You keep making up **** and believing it, this country is fed up with the baby killing left…..we're pickin a fight and we'll win.

---

Not making up anything. The majority of Americans support varying levels of abortion legality. Abortion will NOT become illegal in all states if Roe v Wade is overturned, meaning women who can afford to travel to will continue to have abortion access. And the usage of abortion pills continues to grow, and will do so even more when other abortion options don't exist.

And even the most hardcore anti-abortion activists know that the Democrats are going to use this decision as a way to fire up their members. As far as whether you'll "win", I don't believe for a second that you will. The only question is simply how long it will take for all American women to regain their bodily freedom and abortion rights.

---

There is no such thing as "abortion rights". Activist court made it up, this court will hopefully put an end to that farce. Then it falls to the people of a state to decide how they want to handle it, as it should be.

The right thing to do is the right thing to do, even if it has a political cost. There is never a good reason to kill a baby.

PetroAg87 said:

---

BLSD said:

---

PetroAg87 said:

---

FriscoKid said:

---

Where is Petro?

---

Still here. Unfortunate decision that is going to backfire on the religious conservatives and result in a lot of democratic mobilization going forward. In the meanwhile, those who can afford to travel will still have abortion access, and the rest will rely on abortion pills obtained legally or illegally.

---

You keep making up **** and believing it, this country is fed up with the baby killing left…..we're pickin a fight and we'll win.

---

Not making up anything. The majority of Americans support varying levels of abortion legality. Abortion will NOT become illegal in all states if Roe v Wade is overturned, meaning women who can afford to travel to will continue to have abortion access. And the usage of abortion pills continues to grow, and will do so even more when other abortion options don't exist.

And even the most hardcore anti-abortion activists know that the Democrats are going to use this decision as a way to fire up their members. As far as whether you'll "win", I don't believe for a second that you will. The only question is simply how long it will take for all American women to regain their bodily freedom and abortion rights.

---

What abortion rights?

He said "bodily freedom." Sometime, that came to mean anyone in close proximity to a woman that they want to kill.

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

He said "bodily freedom." Sometime, that came to mean anyone in close proximity to a woman that they want to kill.

---

Yep.

Non-binary professor at @hood_college says she hates conservatives and claims it’s illegal to be trans, gay, and have an interracial marriage. pic.twitter.com/biQEP2jz2a

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) May 4, 2022

"Freedom" to leftists is...really pretty grotesque.

Faustus said:

---

Boo Weekley said:

---

backintexas2013 said:

---

Some of the same people upset about this were all in on the vaccine mandate. Wow.

---

SOME?

I don't recall hearing a single peep from any GD liberal I know in favor of "my body my choice" back when many of us were being forced to get vaccines or get fired (I made a fake lolz). They virtually all supported it and don't let them say otherwise now, in hindsight.

In fact, I remember Rasmussen polls just months ago revealing that nearly half of them supported forced internment of the unvaxxed, as well as loss of custody of children.

They are only "my body my choice" when it comes to destroying the separate body inside them.

F em all.

---

I recall plenty of CMs and libs that post here being against forced vaccination. In fact I can't think of any who were In favor of it.

There's what, less than 10 CMs and libs who post regularly on F16?

The poster most in favor if it was a conservative, military type as I recall (Salute the Marines). I remember Rasmussen polls just months ago saying he was 100% in favor of those soldiers being dishonorably discharged.

Since it's easier to recall one's own posts rather than those that disprove them, I'll help you out.

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3245768/replies/60654922#60654922
(11/21)

Quote:

---

. . . On the virus I'm vaccinated, but only mask up when required by businesses. I worked in the office apart from one week during the pandemic. We socially distanced, but went back to restaurants when they opened. I don't think people should be forced to be vaccinated. . .

---

So there's 10% of the libs there. I'm too lazy to check on the other 7-8 (and I'm not entirely confident I could name that many) but I've already shown your memory to be selective and lacking any desire to find even one F16 lib to quote as far as forcing the vax on you.

I'd be happy to let you show otherwise. [/see what I did there]

Shakes fist at F16 libs regardless, because of the principle of the matter.

---

Liberals are known for their dishonesty...it's a major cornerstone of their pagan religion. Of course some of them would say they were against it, when pressed. Hell, most of them can't even say they are liberal.

But polls certainly did show that just under half of the left supported drastic tyrannical measures against their unvaxxed political foes. And there are millions more who may not have supported confinement or having children taken away, but just thought people should lose their jobs if refusing to get the vax.

You fail to realize how truly insane and hate driven your "side" is. Always goal tending for them.

EDIT: Oh, and to clarify, I was not talking about Texags in my post. Social media, real life...ZERO leftists were taking up the "my body my choice" cause for people being forced to take certain experimental medications or lose their job. In fact, many people I thought were recent middle of the road liberals that I had known my whole life were mocking the "my body my choice" stuff and openly supporting the measures because their CNN or MSNBC masters convinced them that the unvaxxed were selfish and wanted to hurt them and their children.

nortex97 said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

He said "bodily freedom." Sometime, that came to mean anyone in close proximity to a woman that they want to kill.

---

Yep.

Non-binary professor at @hood_college says she hates conservatives and claims it’s illegal to be trans, gay, and have an interracial marriage. pic.twitter.com/biQEP2jz2a

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) May 4, 2022

"Freedom" to leftists is...really pretty grotesque.

---

Ya know, I am going to give partial credit to this one. Before federal law was made, in some states, interracial marriage was illegal, same-sex marriage was illegal, etc.

In fact, if Roe is overturned, abortion will become illegal in some states.

Question is: is that consistent with the Constitution, and there is an argument to be had there. Abortion or marriage in the Constitution? No.

Now, overturning Roe has nothing to do with SSM or inter-racial marriage, but if you squint hard enough through your nose piercings, I can see the slippery slope argument, which radical leftists obvious poopoo when it's their side moving the needle.

Faustus said:

---

Boo Weekley said:

---

backintexas2013 said:

---

Some of the same people upset about this were all in on the vaccine mandate. Wow.

---

SOME?

I don't recall hearing a single peep from any GD liberal I know in favor of "my body my choice" back when many of us were being forced to get vaccines or get fired (I made a fake lolz). They virtually all supported it and don't let them say otherwise now, in hindsight.

In fact, I remember Rasmussen polls just months ago revealing that nearly half of them supported forced internment of the unvaxxed, as well as loss of custody of children.

They are only "my body my choice" when it comes to destroying the separate body inside them.

F em all.

---

I recall plenty of CMs and libs that post here being against forced vaccination. In fact I can't think of any who were In favor of it.

There's what, less than 10 CMs and libs who post regularly on F16?

The poster most in favor if it was a conservative, military type as I recall (Salute the Marines). I remember Rasmussen polls just months ago saying he was 100% in favor of those soldiers being dishonorably discharged.

Since it's easier to recall one's own posts rather than those that disprove them, I'll help you out.

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3245768/replies/60654922#60654922
(11/21)

Quote:

---

. . . On the virus I'm vaccinated, but only mask up when required by businesses. I worked in the office apart from one week during the pandemic. We socially distanced, but went back to restaurants when they opened. I don't think people should be forced to be vaccinated. . .

---

So there's 10% of the libs there. I'm too lazy to check on the other 7-8 (and I'm not entirely confident I could name that many) but I've already shown your memory to be selective and lacking any desire to find even one F16 lib to quote as far as forcing the vax on you.

I'd be happy to let you show otherwise. [/see what I did there]

Shakes fist at F16 libs regardless, because of the principle of the matter.

---

11 edits...

tremble said:

---

Does the question even need to be asked? It's clearly a torch-wielding liberal.

---

I would start in Sotomayor office ... Beginning a the top.

Kvetch said:

---

ActualTalkingThermos said:

---

BMX Bandit said:

---

Alito "signaled" how he felt about those cases long before his leak.

---

He sure did. And if he now has 4 others signing off on it with him, do you see how that's different?

---

Oh no! What if the court overturns garbage precedent enacted by liberal judges on an activist court and returns power to the states?!?!? Ya know, because none of the **** you're talking about is in the Constitution.

Your tears make me happy. And your law practice must be questionable.

---

Is there a special cream for the mushroom stamp you left there?

Are we any closer to finding out the answer posed by the OP?