****The Trial of Johnny Depp vs Amber Heard****

108,568 Views | 1413 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Not a Bot
We fixed the keg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nice pay day for her.
Line Ate Member
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In other news Johnny's wolf and wolves cologne commercial seems to be back on the air.
Iowaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What? Edward Scissorhands? That's her answer?
Iowaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

What? Edward Scissorhands? That's her answer?

I can't tell what's real and what's been spoofed. But that brought the LoLz....Did people really think Edward Scissorhands was a real person after his portrayal?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Iowaggie said:

aggiehawg said:

What? Edward Scissorhands? That's her answer?

I can't tell what's real and what's been spoofed. But that brought the LoLz....Did people really think Edward Scissorhands was a real person after his portrayal?
Watch this of the Lawturbers watching that clip. They all have a WTF? Reaction.

justcallmeharry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If you think I am a liberal, you are incorrect. Assume sarcasm on my part. Sorry if something I post has already been posted. Just the way it is!!
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hmm, ringer on the jury?

Quote:

One of the jurors in the Johnny Depp-Amber Heard defamation trial served improperly, an attorney for Heard alleged in a recent filing that asked the court to declare a mistrial and order a new trial.

"Newly discovered facts" show Juror No. 15 in the six-week trial was not the individual summoned in April to serve in the case, Heard's attorney wrote in a five-page memo filed Friday in Virginia's Fairfax Circuit Court.
Quote:

Instead, the filing suggests Juror No. 15 was a younger individual with the same last name who "apparently" lives at the same address.

"As the Court no doubt agrees, it is deeply troubling for an individual not summoned for jury duty nonetheless to appear for jury duty and serve on a jury, especially in a case such as this," the filing said.
Quote:

The latest filing said a "jury panel list" in the case included a person who would have been 77 at the time of the trial. Voter registration information lists two individuals with the same last name "apparently" residing at the same address, said the filing, in which the names were redacted.
Link
Proc92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Did the fake juror lie on his questionnaire? Did he go through void dire? Did her lawyers object?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Proc92 said:

Did the fake juror lie on his questionnaire? Did he go through void dire? Did her lawyers object?
Don't know. Voir dire in the case was not televised.
Ag In Ok
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So does this day more about jury selection or voter databases?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag In Ok said:

So does this day more about jury selection or voter databases?
Honestly don't know. Not enough info at this point.

Unfamiliar with Virginia law as whether this rises to the level of a mistrial, however. My sense is that it doesn't but can't say with any confidence.
AnScAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Johnny Depp donated his entire settlement. Originally supposed to be $16mil but settled for $1mil. Donated $200k to five different charities. Regardless of his idiosyncrasies, he seems like a good guy.
Not a Bot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This kid has had two heart transplants and the one he has now is failing. He's on hospice.

Depp went out of his way to send him a personal video, called him, and drew attention to him and since then the kid has gained 200k+ Youtube subscribers and gifts keep pouring in.



 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.