Nice pay day for her.
100% convinced we’re living in a simulationpic.twitter.com/XonN6TX6ps
— Warren Sharp (@SharpFootball) June 15, 2022
aggiehawg said:
What? Edward Scissorhands? That's her answer?
Watch this of the Lawturbers watching that clip. They all have a WTF? Reaction.Iowaggie said:aggiehawg said:
What? Edward Scissorhands? That's her answer?
I can't tell what's real and what's been spoofed. But that brought the LoLz....Did people really think Edward Scissorhands was a real person after his portrayal?
CLARIFICATION: judgement - not settlement @LawCrimeNetwork https://t.co/yInEHYkBpe
— Angenette Levy (@Angenette5) June 24, 2022
Quote:
One of the jurors in the Johnny Depp-Amber Heard defamation trial served improperly, an attorney for Heard alleged in a recent filing that asked the court to declare a mistrial and order a new trial.
"Newly discovered facts" show Juror No. 15 in the six-week trial was not the individual summoned in April to serve in the case, Heard's attorney wrote in a five-page memo filed Friday in Virginia's Fairfax Circuit Court.
Quote:
Instead, the filing suggests Juror No. 15 was a younger individual with the same last name who "apparently" lives at the same address.
"As the Court no doubt agrees, it is deeply troubling for an individual not summoned for jury duty nonetheless to appear for jury duty and serve on a jury, especially in a case such as this," the filing said.
LinkQuote:
The latest filing said a "jury panel list" in the case included a person who would have been 77 at the time of the trial. Voter registration information lists two individuals with the same last name "apparently" residing at the same address, said the filing, in which the names were redacted.
Don't know. Voir dire in the case was not televised.Proc92 said:
Did the fake juror lie on his questionnaire? Did he go through void dire? Did her lawyers object?
Honestly don't know. Not enough info at this point.Ag In Ok said:
So does this day more about jury selection or voter databases?