The best rebuttal for this type of testimony would be that his career started to tank more in 2017 after the photographs by the conveniently placed paparazzi at the courthouse.
He is only suing her for what took place after the op-Ed, after his career was already damaged by the earlier allegations. They can't really bring up earlier damage because it's not relevant to the issue at hand in this case.
He is only suing her for what took place after the op-Ed, after his career was already damaged by the earlier allegations. They can't really bring up earlier damage because it's not relevant to the issue at hand in this case.