$50B
Agree. But the point was the traditional Russian approach of throwing bodies at the military problem is no longer applicable given their current demographical, political, geographical situation. This obviously make the idea of voluntarily invading Ukraine foolish.pagerman @ work said:ttu_85 said:To us that's true but even Stalin the hardcore soulless commie invoked the patriotism of Mother Russia by 1942, after praises of the party fell on deaf IDGaF ears. But in the name of Momma Russia, millions of bodies where thrown into the meat grinder and they still came on. That worked, sort of, in the 1940's.MouthBQ98 said:
That can't be good for morale. Hope is very motivational. Doom is just about the opposite.
Thing is they dont have the demographics or population to play that game these days. Old habits die hard in the land of icy hearts. This mentality is going to ruin them.
In WW2 you could make the very real argument that the Germans were an existential threat to the Russian people (forgetting Stalin or communism). Can't say that about voluntarily invading Ukraine.
ttu_85 said:Agree. But the point was the traditional Russian approach of throwing bodies at the military problem is no longer applicable given their current demographical, political, geographical situation. This obviously make the idea of voluntarily invading Ukraine foolish.pagerman @ work said:ttu_85 said:To us that's true but even Stalin the hardcore soulless commie invoked the patriotism of Mother Russia by 1942, after praises of the party fell on deaf IDGaF ears. But in the name of Momma Russia, millions of bodies where thrown into the meat grinder and they still came on. That worked, sort of, in the 1940's.MouthBQ98 said:
That can't be good for morale. Hope is very motivational. Doom is just about the opposite.
Thing is they dont have the demographics or population to play that game these days. Old habits die hard in the land of icy hearts. This mentality is going to ruin them.
In WW2 you could make the very real argument that the Germans were an existential threat to the Russian people (forgetting Stalin or communism). Can't say that about voluntarily invading Ukraine.
Russia thought they'd win in a month. Then when their logistics catastrophically failed in the first months of the war they went back to throwing bodies at bullets without even looking at the demographic condition. Very dumb in their part.
Demography is a long term problem. If they win, they will have more fighting age people (Ukrainian) than when they started. Perhaps not enough to invade Poland, but enough to wage smaller fight. Think of how many Ukrainians they conscripted after their 2014 invasion,ttu_85 said:Agree. But the point was the traditional Russian approach of throwing bodies at the military problem is no longer applicable given their current demographical, political, geographical situation. This obviously make the idea of voluntarily invading Ukraine foolish.pagerman @ work said:ttu_85 said:To us that's true but even Stalin the hardcore soulless commie invoked the patriotism of Mother Russia by 1942, after praises of the party fell on deaf IDGaF ears. But in the name of Momma Russia, millions of bodies where thrown into the meat grinder and they still came on. That worked, sort of, in the 1940's.MouthBQ98 said:
That can't be good for morale. Hope is very motivational. Doom is just about the opposite.
Thing is they dont have the demographics or population to play that game these days. Old habits die hard in the land of icy hearts. This mentality is going to ruin them.
In WW2 you could make the very real argument that the Germans were an existential threat to the Russian people (forgetting Stalin or communism). Can't say that about voluntarily invading Ukraine.
Russia thought they'd win in a month. Then when their logistics catastrophically failed in the first months of the war they went back to throwing bodies at bullets without even looking at the demographic condition. Very dumb in their part.
⚡️🇷🇺2S35 Koalitsiya-SV is a different beast to the 2S19 Msta-S pic.twitter.com/3gaZMjVK3l
— SIMPLICIUS Ѱ (@simpatico771) May 6, 2024
Even the Navy's hypervelocity projectiles have a range of ~half that. My guess is that these are likely rocket assisted rounds with the rocket engine having a long burnout phase serving as gas generator to provide a base bleed.JFABNRGR said:
100KM 155 Arty? Laser designated. I would like to see how that works even from modeling.
https://news.online.ua/en/rheinmetall-plans-to-supply-ukraine-with-100-km-range-artillery-shells-877918/
lb3 said:Even the Navy's hypervelocity projectiles have a range of ~half that. My guess is that these are likely rocket assisted rounds with the rocket engine having a long burnout phase serving as gas generator to provide a base bleed.JFABNRGR said:
100KM 155 Arty? Laser designated. I would like to see how that works even from modeling.
https://news.online.ua/en/rheinmetall-plans-to-supply-ukraine-with-100-km-range-artillery-shells-877918/
They firing it with this?JFABNRGR said:
100KM 155 Arty? Laser designated. I would like to see how that works even from modeling.
https://news.online.ua/en/rheinmetall-plans-to-supply-ukraine-with-100-km-range-artillery-shells-877918/
The Germans are again, really, really good at artillery. This will be in very limited quantities though, I'd expect. It could be useful this summer against command nodes/bridges/counter battery fire etc.Quote:
A long-time NATO customer awarded the South African subsidiary Rheinmetall Denel Munition a framework contract for the supply of 155mm ammunition of the proven Assegai product line.
The five years framework contract provides for the delivery of 155mm M2005 V-LAP (Velocity Enhanced Long Range Artillery Projectile) projectiles, M92 modular charges, and various fuses. The 155mm M2005 V-LAP projectile features a high fragmentation effect as well as an extended range through rocket and base bleed technology. The rocket assists V-LAP projectile together with the Assegai M92 tactical charges features barrel erosion and muzzle signature reducer properties. It is designed according to the NATO Joint Ballistics Memorandum of Understanding (JBMoU) requirements and qualified according to STANAG guidelines. The ammunition is already deployed in several NATO countries.
"We are proud to support our long-time NATO partner with Rheinmetall's world leading long-range artillery suite. Framework agreements provide long-term ammunition supply assurance and a flexible system for procuring ammunition over the course of a year", stated Jan-Patrick Helmsen, CEO of Rheinmetall Denel Munition. "The rocket assist V-lap together with the tactical assegai charges M92 with barrel wearer reducer and muzzle flash reducer will support both the soldiers in the battlefield and the logistics and maintenance troops."
being laser guided it will need small fins for the terminal flight phase. It's possible they could also have small foldout wings that open at apogee.Eliminatus said:lb3 said:Even the Navy's hypervelocity projectiles have a range of ~half that. My guess is that these are likely rocket assisted rounds with the rocket engine having a long burnout phase serving as gas generator to provide a base bleed.JFABNRGR said:
100KM 155 Arty? Laser designated. I would like to see how that works even from modeling.
https://news.online.ua/en/rheinmetall-plans-to-supply-ukraine-with-100-km-range-artillery-shells-877918/
That would be really interesting to see. If you had asked me five minutes ago I would have said those systems were mutually exclusive of each other as an immediate answer but after thinking about it for a bit, I guess that could be overcome with some clever engineering. Even "damn, why wasn't this a thing already" territory. Would be some long bois for sure though.
RogerEnright said:Demography is a long term problem. If they win, they will have more fighting age people (Ukrainian) than when they started. Perhaps not enough to invade Poland, but enough to wage smaller fight. Think of how many Ukrainians they conscripted after their 2014 invasion,ttu_85 said:Agree. But the point was the traditional Russian approach of throwing bodies at the military problem is no longer applicable given their current demographical, political, geographical situation. This obviously make the idea of voluntarily invading Ukraine foolish.pagerman @ work said:ttu_85 said:To us that's true but even Stalin the hardcore soulless commie invoked the patriotism of Mother Russia by 1942, after praises of the party fell on deaf IDGaF ears. But in the name of Momma Russia, millions of bodies where thrown into the meat grinder and they still came on. That worked, sort of, in the 1940's.MouthBQ98 said:
That can't be good for morale. Hope is very motivational. Doom is just about the opposite.
Thing is they dont have the demographics or population to play that game these days. Old habits die hard in the land of icy hearts. This mentality is going to ruin them.
In WW2 you could make the very real argument that the Germans were an existential threat to the Russian people (forgetting Stalin or communism). Can't say that about voluntarily invading Ukraine.
Russia thought they'd win in a month. Then when their logistics catastrophically failed in the first months of the war they went back to throwing bodies at bullets without even looking at the demographic condition. Very dumb in their part.
Tells me things are going his way and the aid should have gone much sooner than it did.74OA said:
Putin rattling his nuclear sabre yet again, plus other notes from the front.
UPDATES
Would love to see them do that with some anti-sub torpedos and have the drone boats go out and linger where the subs have been launching cruise missiles from. We probably have the aerial surveillance capability to narrow that down for them pretty well. Put a solar panel on the drone and I bet it could linger for quite a while pretty quietly waiting on a sub to show up.74OA said:
"In a most unusual development in the Black Sea 'drone war,' Ukraine appears to have begun arming uncrewed surface vessels (USVs), better known as drone boats, with heat-seeking air-to-air missiles."
BAIT?
Ukraine is working on underwater drones that mimic torpedoes. Don't know if they can detect and target subs, though.txags92 said:Would love to see them do that with some anti-sub torpedos and have the drone boats go out and linger where the subs have been launching cruise missiles from. We probably have the aerial surveillance capability to narrow that down for them pretty well. Put a solar panel on the drone and I bet it could linger for quite a while pretty quietly waiting on a sub to show up.74OA said:
"In a most unusual development in the Black Sea 'drone war,' Ukraine appears to have begun arming uncrewed surface vessels (USVs), better known as drone boats, with heat-seeking air-to-air missiles."
BAIT?
Various Russian shared footage of a Russian Ka-29 helicopter destroying a Ukrainian maritime drone, claiming that the uncrewed boat carried the Soviet-era P-73 and/or P-60 air-to-air missiles, and, moreover, the USV attacked the aircraft with one of its missiles but missed. pic.twitter.com/vYkDSaZjj6
— Euromaidan Press (@EuromaidanPress) May 6, 2024
Tests of the new version of the Ukrainian Sea Baby naval drone with a new hull design. As said new model can carry up to 10 centners of explosives over distances of up to 1000km. But the possibilities of using marine drones of this model will not be limited only to use in the… pic.twitter.com/4n7QtuqLag
— Special Kherson Cat 🐈🇺🇦 (@bayraktar_1love) March 6, 2024
I was hoping to see this video months later after recovery of the helo and its crew from the sea floor, getting to see FP view of that rocket streaking up off the drone and into the helo.sclaff said:Various Russian shared footage of a Russian Ka-29 helicopter destroying a Ukrainian maritime drone, claiming that the uncrewed boat carried the Soviet-era P-73 and/or P-60 air-to-air missiles, and, moreover, the USV attacked the aircraft with one of its missiles but missed. pic.twitter.com/vYkDSaZjj6
— Euromaidan Press (@EuromaidanPress) May 6, 2024
⚡️ Media: Russia no longer using Crimean Bridge to supply front lines.
— The Kyiv Independent (@KyivIndependent) May 6, 2024
Russia has stopped using the Crimean Bridge to transport military equipment to the front lines and is instead using overland routes, The Independent and investigative group Molfar reported on May 6.
Read… pic.twitter.com/Lc18ARUwva
revvie said:I hope the war in Ukraine has given us a "wake up call" on our supply chain and production issues on our ability to fight a prolonged conventional conflict.Ag with kids said:I agree 100%.ABATTBQ11 said:aezmvp said:
You make a good point but would our stockpiles be sufficient to go toe to toe with China for an extended period? I have my doubts. I think the production and stockpile side of US defense policy has been ignored or mismanaged for a long time. Same with our repair and building side when it comes to naval capacity. But point taken on the doctrinal side.
Big maybes. A war with China would be much different because of the different terrain.
Yes, production and stockpiles have been mismanaged, but we haven't needed those levels of usage and stockpiling. It's very difficult to justify the cost. I think this conflict has been a real eye opener not just for the military, but those funding it. This is not WWII where a car assembly line can just convert to tank production, and I think that has been lost on many people.
Naval capacity is the same as well, but we have been trying to fix that for some time. Autonomous warships have been in development for awhile, and they'll likely be important on whatever the next conflict is as shown in the Black Sea.
And this is where I think the isolationists and "non-interventionalists" are completely delusional. You can't turn off the defense industry (or the "MIC" as they like to term it) and expect to spool up in any short time...like you said, it worked in WWII. But the materiel and weapon systems being built today operate on the decade scale, not the yearly scale.
JFABNRGR said:
100KM 155 Arty? Laser designated. I would like to see how that works even from modeling.
https://news.online.ua/en/rheinmetall-plans-to-supply-ukraine-with-100-km-range-artillery-shells-877918/
Quote:
The United States will soon have "a lot" of Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) to refill its stockpiles, allowing Washington, D.C., to provide Ukraine with key long-range capabilities without compromising U.S. arsenals, according to the U.S. Army's acquisition boss.
A "significant number" of ATACMS missiles were ordered several years ago and are "now hitting at just the right time to be able to support how we're supporting Ukraine without taking a hit to readiness," Doug Bush, the assistant secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology, said in remarks reported by Politico on Thursday. "There are a lot of ATACMS coming off that [production] line."
China’s Increasing Role in Russia’s Defense Industry#Velsig #DragonBear https://t.co/FPRsWcedER
— Velina Tchakarova (@vtchakarova) May 7, 2024
Interesting and a brand new article. All those other videos said barrel life should be better with ram jet technology but did say one of the MICs was using other than Ram Jet technology.Ulysses90 said:JFABNRGR said:
100KM 155 Arty? Laser designated. I would like to see how that works even from modeling.
https://news.online.ua/en/rheinmetall-plans-to-supply-ukraine-with-100-km-range-artillery-shells-877918/
The US Army recently canceled the Extended Range Cannon Artillery (ERCA) program after evaluating a prototype. It could hit accurately out to 70km. The reason they canceled it was because of the very significant fatigue and erosion in the 58 caliber length cannon tube.
https://www.thedefensepost.com/2024/03/12/us-army-cannon-artillery/
If someone is providing funding for a constant stream of replacement cannon tubes, it might be a very profitable project for Rheinmetal.
We've made significant progress over the last two years expanding our defense industrial capacity for both low- and high-end munitions. It's not as though we haven't been paying attention to what's happening in Ukraine. For example:aezmvp said:
A different factor is exposing how ridiculously thin our material stock piles are and how they've become overly reliant on wunderweapons. Amazing, effective but too expensive to stockpile for a peer to peer conflict.