Smart guy, also an advisor of sorts to Zelensky so his bias is fairly clear. From the IG comments:
Quote:
I followed his Yale course on Ukrainian history. He would periodically require substitutes (they are excellent) because he was flying to Ukraine to meet with Zelenskyy.
He's right as well as to the European propensity toward wars (and all wars are wars of aggression). I haven't read up on Snyder, but this is interesting indeed from his speech/response;
Quote:
There isn't, there isn't a moment where we've done that. I think that's a lesson that we should learn, that whether Russia invaded Ukraine was not up to us, and what happens in the aftermath is also not up to us, not just in a moral sense, but also in a practical sense. It's unlikely that we're going to be able to affect it very much.
And so if we can't affect it very much, it shouldn't be the thing that is guiding us, because you shouldn't guide yourself into a place where you know you're going to be impotent.
So if we design our policy around trying to be sure that what happens in Russia is going to be a normal democratic regime change or something, you're then aiming for a place that you're never going to reach because it doesn't really exist.
Separately/notably, Kadyrov, who is absolute scum imho, does appear…close to death here, which I am pleased to share (this might cause a significant disruption in the Russian alliance/partnership etc.);
Kharkiv battle damage;