agent-maroon said:
AlaskanAg99 said:
They need to take out railroad bridges. All of them. Preferably while a train engine is on the tracks.
Then ammo and fuel depos.
Bring Back the Anti-Rail Landmine
Quote:
As Chuck de Caro proposed in Small Wars Journal, special operators could sneak deep into enemy territory, and emplace anti-rail landmines in strategic rail choke points.[4] De Caro proposed regular Semtex, but anti-rail landmines would damage, derail, or destroy the locomotive and cars in addition to the railway. Damaging, derailing, or destroying the locomotive or cars would make things much worse. Damaged, derailed, or destroyed cars or locomotives, weighing potentially over 60 tons, may need to be moved, before the train can continue or railway repairs can start. If the locomotive is derailed or severely damage, the train may need to wait for another locomotive to arrive to move the rail cars. All that delay slows delivery of the train's supplies, while also fixing the train in a known position for follow-on artillery, drone, air, or special operator strikes. Even more so if the explosion also takes out a rail bridge. Recovering from a destroyed rail bridge is a big challenge; adding a destroyed locomotive and some train cars too would be a nightmare. Military engineers would need to work even harder, and longer to recover, increasing the vulnerability to follow-on attacks.
Thoughts? This would be even more effective if an anti-rail landmine could be deployed by drones somehow.
I am in the RR Bridge construction and repair business now and was formerly LRS.
First russia has a very large rail maintenance and repair force so your targets need to be prioritized on locations requiring complexities of bridge scale or access and as said previously if you can take out the track and the train maybe you damage the cargo and now provide an obstacle to repair.
I think the limitation here is having the intel of train location with munitions capability to meet at a specific location. I would be all for giving them the long range ATACAMs and even cruise missiles for targeting all major bridges serving the theatre and even targeting trains directly.
As for sabotage, this has occurred, is risky and again limited. The weight alone of explosives required to take down a concrete steel bridge while carrying all of your survival essentials deep into enemy territory to target a likely defended target pretty risky.
Drones. Currently the aerial ones are limited to payload and range. Will be interesting to see if Ukes are developing something to run on the rail that could cut track and get a derail. This could possibly be delivered by drone or placed several KM before target increasing the capabilities of a team.
I suspect at this point in the war the orcs are transloading off their trains farther from the front already to protect from such attacks.
Its interesting that the orcs have not done this to the rails in western Ukraine with their cruise missiles…..guess they want them for apartment buildings.