LMCane said:
fullback44 said:
I watched the military channel last night.. they had a 10 min section on the HIMARS system .. HO LEE CHIT, that is one lethal weapon, no wonder Ukraine is kicking Russia's ass.. there are various HIMARS missiles, however the AIRBURST missile is deadly, it destroys everything in a 200 yard radius.. extremely deadly weapon.. we need to give Ukraine some of the longer range missiles, they could reach the Amo supply dumps deeper into Russia.
Also watched a special on the VAMPIRE system... very deadly, basically takes shorter range Apache helicopter missiles and adds a guidance system that makes them deadly accurate. The system makes the missile a guided missile that can take out ground targets and / or drones.. in expensive weapon that can do a lot of damage... and cheaper than the Javelins
I have been pleasantly surprised by the effectiveness of NASAMS and IRIS-T
at least from the media reports unless the Ukes are just lying about their shootdown rate
The effectiveness of the HIMARS shouldn't really be a surprise, since it's basically an M270 MLRS, except with only 1 6-rocket pod instead of 2, mounted on a truck instead of a tracked chassis.
The MLRS has been in the U.S. Army inventory for almost four decades, and was extremely effective during the Gulf War in 1991, earning the nickname the Grid Smasher. (A single launcher firing a full 12 rocket salvo could dump over 8.000 DPICM sub-munitions into a 60 acre area in less than a minute.)
What has been encouraging is how effective they are without cluster munition warheads (stupid Princess Di treaty, which we didn't even ratify but Bush43 insisted we abide by anyway.)