***Russian - Ukraine War Tactical and Strategic Updates*** [Warning on OP]

7,590,366 Views | 47821 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by Tanker123
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JFABNRGR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Robk said:

Do rail bridges use rock/gravel like built up tracks?


Yes they do. They are called ballast deck bridges and are preferred over open deck bridges because much easier to level track (rails).

It is very possible with the right crews and equipment to make track repairs of this length that quickly. Not saying this pic is legit of first train but it could have been taken from well before or after the repairs.

Hopefully the heat has weakened the steel enough, that a few cycles has a upcoming catastrophic failure, but this also wishful thinking.
“You can resolve to live your life with integrity. Let your credo be this: Let the lie come into the world, let it even triumph. But not through me.”
- Alexander Solzhenitsyn
agent-maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just a thought, but if we did actually see a boat/drone underneath the bridge then maybe it's purpose was to coordinate the remote explosion of the truck bomb at a particular spot on the bridge (like near the fuel tank cars) for maximum effect? Seems like we would have heard something if a drone was involved.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Interesting question.

Quote:

The Kerch bridge was yet another way in which Putin doled out his political favors for those who supported his tsarist impulses. That same dynamic played out in the supposed "modernization" of Russia's military. Putin et al have spent years building up the sophistication and capabilities of the Russian army, fueled by the supposed massive infrastructural investments from Putin's oligarch cronies. Instead, what has become apparent is that the military has been starved of materiel, training, and talent while Putin's pals have enriched themselves to obscene levels.

And all of that money, which could have gone into improving the lives of ordinary Russians as Troianovski pointed out in 2018, has not even given them a decent and capable system of national defense.

Russia announced that one side of the road bridge has reopened, but it may not be for long, as an explosion like that would likely have destabilized the foundation on both sides. Plus, what Russia really needs for supply into Crimea is the rail bridge. The Russian army relies heavily on rail for its supply and communication lines, and it's no coincidence that the Kerch bridge system included rail from the beginning. The damage on that line looks like it could take weeks to clear even under the best conditions, let alone repair.

Repair, by the way, is no sure thing at this point. Putin will have to spend billions of dollars he doesn't have in a wartime environment to fix what may end up being his last significant line of communication with Crimea. Where does that money come from, and where does he find the labor? How does Putin even get the materials? Now that the Kerch bridge has proven vulnerable, any money they do spend on repairing it might be wasted in another attack.
Quote:

That would either force Putin to begin sailing his ships into the area again to provide relief, where Ukrainian forces have proven adept at sinking Russian ships, or leave them cut off for an indefinite period while Russian tries to force its land communications open again in a new offensive. All of these are options that would strain even a von Clausewitz, but then again, a von Clausewitz wouldn't have been caught in this kind of incompetent failure in the first place.
Via Hot Air
agent-maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Hopefully the heat has weakened the steel enough, that a few cycles has a upcoming catastrophic failure, but this also wishful thinking.
If the heat caused soft spots in the girders then that very well could lead to a crack initiation leading to fatigue fracture failure, especially given the stresses that are present at the points in the girders nearest the flame. Interesting thought.

Side question - anybody else take Dr. Walter Bradley's Mechanical Metallurgy class back in the 80's - 90's? He started every class with a horror story about failures caused by events much like this. One of my favorites from MEEN.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
CondensedFogAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
p_bubel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CondensedFogAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Yeah, get out of Crimea folks.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Yeah, get out of Crimea folks.
Off ramp. Use it.
BlackGoldAg2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Structural engineer' twitter thread with his observations.



Great breakdown, but my one issue is he compares the damage done by himar rockets on the other bridge as evidence against a top down attack. The problem is those rockets at largest carry like a 500lb warhead. Then look at the blast made by the OKC bomb which was 7k lbs of anfo (non-ideal high explosive) explosives which have about half the blasting force per lb as more ideal high explosives like RDX and HMX more commonly found in military explosives. The blast that could be generated from a truck bomb with high explosives is simple 1-2 orders or magnitude larger than what a rocket can do. Using the firecracker/hand example, yes, you can maybe open palm a black cat and receive minimal damage, but if you open palm a stick of dynamite your hand will just be gone. A semi truck could absolutely contain enough explosive to deflect the road deck down to the point of critical failure, especially if the blast was mid span. I'm not saying that is for sure what happened (though looking at everything I personally think the truck bomb is the most likely explanation), but it is for sure doable with that setup when you think of how much explosive you could get in that truck.

Edit to cut out all but one twitter link
Edit 2 to correct my explosives terminology
edit 3: one final add on then i'll be done

for scale comparison, MOAB has a payload of ~11 tons of TNT, which is similar in scale to what you could get in this truck. at 300 ' away it its pressure wave is still generating 20 psi overpressure. if you apply that to the road deck, one side of the deck is roughly 40' wide, so a 10' long section that is 40' wide would suddenly have over 1 MM lbs of extra downward force, and that's using the 300 ft away number. Just pointing out the magnitude of what could be generated by a truck bomb done right.
BaitShack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is starting to sound like a plane on a treadmill.
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ANFO IS a high explosive.
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BlackGoldAg2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ABATTBQ11 said:

ANFO IS a high explosive.
thanks for the correction, i'll fix it in my post above. was mixing up terminology in my head and comparing to more commonly used HEs like RDX and HMX. vs non-ideal high explosives like anfo and annm
AgLA06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Huh. How about that.
sclaff
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Waffledynamics said:


I believe this. If you look at the first video of the two, both the car passing the truck and the truck survive. The cars driving to the camera survive but appear to drive through the fireball.

It looks like the explosion was just behind the truck and car driving away and the high winds blew the fireball across the bridge.
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agent-maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Clarification requested please - are they coming into port or leaving? Fight or flight?

Couldn't tell from the twitter replies I read
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
sclaff said:

Waffledynamics said:


I believe this. If you look at the first video of the two, both the car passing the truck and the truck survive. The cars driving to the camera survive but appear to drive through the fireball.

It looks like the explosion was just behind the truck and car driving away and the high winds blew the fireball across the bridge.


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2022/10/08/ukraine-russia-war-latest-putin-nuclear-threat-zaporizhzhia/

People in the truck with the bomb and the car next to it are dead.
tremble
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Russia is saying it was a truck bomb but I'll take anything coming from Russian mouths with a mountain of salt.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Here's a picture of the railway bridge while it was under construction. Maybe some of our resident engineers can comment on how redundant this structure is?



Also



TXAggie2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tremble said:

Russia is saying it was a truck bomb but I'll take anything coming from Russian mouths with a mountain of salt.


Nothing in the videos of the explosion nor the damage afterward appears to me to be consistent with "the" truck that's visible in the videos.

And, sorry if this has been mentioned already, but the road deck that's collapsed and the adjacent road decks still intact…I'm not seeing much or any scorching or damage on them, which you would expect if the explosion came from a vehicle driving on them.

I'm not sure the Russians know exactly what happened at this point, but I think suicide truck bomb is a pretty easy thing to run with and sounds a lot less sophisticated and a lot more barbarous and terroristic than a remote control boat or something like that
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgLA06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:




They might as well said. Ukrainian's next target will begin operations....
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Some ambitious officials have seen opportunity in the chaos, pitching to the Kremlin on ways to turn around a failing war and a botched mobilisation. Others are lying low, seeking to hold on to power or avoid punishment. Western intelligence agencies have reported high levels of dissatisfaction among the Russian army and in the country's elite. Some have even suggested a coup could take place.
Quote:

Two of Vladimir Putin's most notorious lieutenants, Prigozhin and the Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov, have openly declared war against the defence minister, Putin loyalist Sergei Shoigu, and his top generals following a series of disastrous defeats that have left Russia's army in retreat. …

According to a former senior defence official who worked with Shoigu and Prigozhin, the rivalry between the two men is a longstanding feud that goes back to the founding of Wagner in 2014 after the annexation of Crimea. It was exacerbated, the person said, when Shoigu recently fired deputy defence minister Dmitry Bulgakov, an official who had reportedly helped Prigozhin obtain lucrative contracts supplying the army.

"Prigozhin will now be out for revenge against Shoigu," that person said. He described Prigozhin as a person with "no morals, no conscience, and no hobbies … He is a machine in the bad sense of the word."
Via Hot Air
TXAggie2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tony Franklins Other Shoe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgLA06 said:

aggiehawg said:




They might as well said. Ukrainian's next target will begin operations....


That's what I was thinking. Schedule, same place every trip.

Person Not Capable of Pregnancy
agent-maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Who wouldn't be excited to be on that vessel's crew? That's a fast lane ticket to the next life.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
IMO, if Putin allows that plant to go into meltdown and a nuclear "accident" results like Chernobyl, that's equivalent to him using a tacticl nuke.
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rossticus said:


IIRC, all the reactors there have been shut down, so does that not prevent it becoming a disaster?
First Page Last Page
Page 832 of 1367
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.