knj2417 said:
Waffledynamics said:
74OA said:
benchmark said:
Doesn't appear to have damaged the structural girders. Looks repairable..
Ukraine doesn't need to cut off Russian resupply, just make it late to need and of insufficient volume to support high-firepower ops.
So, if Ukraine can repeatedly damage bridges and other LOCs just enough to keep them impassable, but without destroying them, it's win-win as they then strangle Russian logistics without further gutting their own national infrastructure.
And without making their own movement across the river more difficult.
Good point - but what stops Russia from doing the same thing when Uke's take back Kherson? Could end up being a back and forth
Always that potential, but Russia's operational reliance on high firepower volume rather than maneuver makes it more dependent than is Ukraine on continuously intact resupply LOCs.
Additionally, Russian forces are compressed into narrow strips of Ukraine. As Ukraine presses forward, particularly in the south, more Russian LOCs come into MLRS/HIMARS range while more Ukrainian LOCs move out of effective artillery range.