What is the difference in Putin's strategic/tactical options in one month if and when Ukraine destroys them or the russians being destroyed in a few days, with alot more direct help?amercer said:No Spin Ag said:We better respond in kind if they harm one American one of or our allies.Rossticus said:
Russia trying to dive a wedge between US and NATO. They feel they've identified us as a weak link. With good reason.BREAKING: Russia's Deputy FM says his country had informed Washington that weapons supply convoys into Ukraine are 'legitimate targets' for the Russian military
— The Spectator Index (@spectatorindex) March 12, 2022
It's long past time Putin F'ks around and finds out.
The strategic calculus for the US hasn't changed in the last 2 weeks, although the situation on the ground has greatly improved from our point of view.
Our goal is to help as much as possible without directly engaging the Russians. Even a small nuclear exchange could kill millions.
The Ukrainians are bleeding the Russians dry. In another month the Russians will be a spent force, and every day that we don't engage them makes it easier to wipe them off the map when/if we do. The world is trading Ukrainian lives for the hobbling of a dangerous madman. It is horrible to watch, but I don't think there is another path right now.
I don't know the answer to that, but I do know there will be a lot more Ukrainian civilians still alive along with a lot less development destroyed.
UKR attacks on russian civilian targets is likely .000001% meanwhile theyre attacks on russian military targets at 99.99%.
Russia on the other hand has likely targeted 95% of UKR civilians or civilian structure while only 5% of UKR military.
The TIME IS NOW and has been for weeks.
