***Russian - Ukraine War Tactical and Strategic Updates*** [Warning on OP]

7,631,228 Views | 47859 Replies | Last: 17 hrs ago by 74OA
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
P.U.T.U said:

And it would have to be older Chinese stuff since they no longer use the AK based stuff.
What do they use now?
TRM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Something appears to be happening with Russia's intelligence directorate.




Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Only a matter of time, but… Damn


Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?



VitruvianAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ATX_AG_08 said:



Flashing Infrared beacons? FOF ID, no? Brilliant if so! Until...
ATX_AG_08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JFABNRGR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ATX_AG_08 said:


Jeez the balls on this crew to ambush an armor column from 60 meters or less. Looks like less than a squad size element, likely even smaller now.

Initiating round appears to miss fire. The second looks like the signature of an NLAW in direct attack mode and hits the turret.

Looks like at least 8KIA 1WIA on russian side.
TRM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maybe a video they'd have been better off keeping to themselves
TRM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aezmvp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rossticus said:


If you read the Politico stuff and some of the things people are saying from inside State and DoD it seems like the last person to speak is the one who wins when Biden is there. This isn't a surprise. I am astounded this has been handled so poorly. Really am.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

In fact, it was the Fifth Service that was responsible for providing Vladimir Putin with information about political developments in Ukraine in the leadup to the invasion. And after two weeks of war, it now appears that Putin has finally realized that he was misled: afraid of angering the Russian leader, the Fifth Service simply told him what he wanted to hear.

Now, our sources report that General Beseda and his deputy have been placed under house arrest for reasons including the alleged misuse of funds allocated for operations, as well as for providing bad intelligence. Indeed, it appears that the intel delivered by Putin's career intelligence officer has only gone from bad to worse.
Uhm, yeah...about those payrolls for all of our recruited assets in Ukraine who we said would be there to take over when Zelensky flees...we made them up and pocketed the money.
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rossticus said:


Bob Gates' statements about Biden's foreign policy instincts come to mind when reading this...
P.U.T.U
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Some units still use the QBZ-95s that is chambered in 5.8mm (which Russia does not have), QBZ9-97 (5.56 NATO round, mostly exported this one), and now uses the QBZ-191 (another 5.8mm gun) that is more similar to the HK416.

Russia has armed like half of Africa so I am shocked to see a decent amount of WW2 Mosin Nagant. A bolt action rifle that fired a big round and has a steel butt stock, also hard to mount a scope to which does not lend well to urban combat.
P.U.T.U
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rossticus said:


A lot of US soldiers said they grabbed these every chance they could, actually a pretty decent weapon system
clobby
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bill or Robert Gates?
Touchless
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Teddy Perkins said:

Russia finally getting involved posting some "victories"? Although the hit looks like it may be against an empty and stuck vehicle.


Crazy to me how poor quality some of the video has been from this war. I know things are far away and zoomed in all the way, just seems like surely there are better cameras out there.
JFABNRGR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Looks like a training gig to me. Likely used a drone way above to video than observe later for AAR.

Glint tape/squares on the backs/fronts would have been enough.

IR strobe can be seen a long way.

This said I dont think the markings on all the z, o, markings on all the russian vehicles is IR reflective.
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JFABNRGR said:

ATX_AG_08 said:


Jeez the balls on this crew to ambush an armor column from 60 meters or less. Looks like less than a squad size element, likely even smaller now.

Initiating round appears to miss fire. The second looks like the signature of an NLAW in direct attack mode and hits the turret.

Looks like at least 8KIA 1WIA on russian side.
Good hit on the first tank, but i hope the ukes got out of there. The Russian tactics were not bad? BMPs move off the other side of the road, 2 trailing MBTs fire on the Ukes.
Jock 07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TRM said:




Weather doesn't affect SAR
OKC~Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
somber view of our current state of our air force capaility and to carry out no fly zone

Russian threats are significant, with their surface-to-air missile systems leading the world in their technical sophistication and lethality. Their fighters are also quite capable, especially when armed with modern missiles that often outperform our own.
While the U.S. and its NATO allies likely have enough refueling and C2ISR aircraft to sustain operations - albeit the majority built in the 1960s and 1970s and in need of modernization - the real capacity and capability crunch comes down to fighters. Western nations gutted their combat aircraft inventories after the Cold War and slow-rolled building new types. Too many of the remaining fighter planes are based on designs from the late 1960s and 1970s that were built decades ago. U.S. Air Force fighters average 30 years in age. These aircraft are worn and lack modern technologies to survive against high end threats.

The sole exception to this are the U.S.-built F-22 and F-35, the only modern fifth-generation fighters with the stealth, sensors and processing power required to give pilots favorable odds of executing their missions and getting home safe. However, because of shortsighted thinking amid wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the U.S. canceled F-22 production at less than half its planned buy - just 187 aircraft procured. F-35s were supposed to be built in high volume, but technical problems earlier in the program and competing budget priorities saw build rates cut. Right now, the Air Force has just over 300 of these aircraft, with the U.S. Navy, U.S. Marine Corps, and a select number of allied nations possessing far fewer.

Things get even more bleak when considering total F-22 and F-35 inventories are not available for combat use. A significant number are tied up training pilots, testing new capabilities, or are down for major depot-level maintenance. This translates to fewer than 100 F-22s and 150 F-35s available for combat. No-fly zone enforcement requires the persistence of a rotational system. Generally speaking, one-third of the aircraft are executing the mission, another third are flying back to base, and the final third are getting ready to launch.
For the U.S. Air Force, this translates to roughly only 30 F-22s and 50 F-35s on station at any given time over the second largest country in Europe. These numbers do not account for aircraft down for maintenance or that no fifth-generation fighters would be available to check China's aggression in the Pacific, or challenges by Iran or North Korea. Said another way, unilaterally committing the total Air Force F-22 and F-35 inventory gives a green light for another aggressor to launch hostilities. Yes, the Navy, Marine Corps and limited allied nations could contribute F-35s, but these numbers are not substantial at present.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/want-a-no-fly-zone-you-need-a-modern-air-force-first/ar-AAUXefB?li=BBnb7Kz
JFABNRGR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If the ruskies cant shoot down an 80 mph drone, fly target missions with hand held civilian gps systems, and cant find & destroy 56 UKR aircraft, I will have to put my money on our pilots and our aircraft even in its worst state.

Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Teddy KGB
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JFABNRGR said:

ATX_AG_08 said:


Jeez the balls on this crew to ambush an armor column from 60 meters or less. Looks like less than a squad size element, likely even smaller now.

Initiating round appears to miss fire. The second looks like the signature of an NLAW in direct attack mode and hits the turret.

Looks like at least 8KIA 1WIA on russian side.
Correct me if I'm wrong but in a near ambush shouldn't you close with the enemy as quickly as possible? The Russians don't even have an organized response?
War is Peace Freedom is Slavery Ignorance is Strength
ATX_AG_08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rosstafari
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rosstafari
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Raiderjay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That dude is a Badass.......
Rosstafari
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rosstafari
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rosstafari
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rosstafari
How long do you want to ignore this user?
First Page Last Page
Page 309 of 1368
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.