***Russian - Ukraine War Tactical and Strategic Updates*** [Warning on OP]

6,881,307 Views | 45478 Replies | Last: 5 hrs ago by ABATTBQ11
AGS-R-TUFF
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
benchmark said:

74OA said:

Three more Russian generals get the SACK.
Also this.

Are these guys removed from theatre or demoted and kept in the fight somewhere? Because if they're getting one wayed back to mother Russia, that's probably saving their arses from the Uke target list.
sclaff
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1556092549474820097.html
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AGS-R-TUFF said:

benchmark said:

74OA said:

Three more Russian generals get the SACK.
Also this.

Are these guys removed from theatre or demoted and kept in the fight somewhere? Because if they're getting one wayed back to mother Russia, that's probably saving their arses from the Uke target list.
If Putin is truly trying to go back to the USSR, they are taking a one way trip to Lefortovo prison where they will tragically suffer a 9x18mm brain hemorrhage.
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Really interesting thread. Thanks for sharing. I imagine Ukraine has a bit more shaping to do?
Rock1982
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
One of the best posts in this entire thread.

sclaff said:



https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1556092549474820097.html
Red1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If I had to plan the attack on the Russian 42nd Division I would continue to:

- Destroy bridges or keep them destroyed.
- Destroy rail capabilities of the Russians.
- Destroy ammunition and supply depots.
- Destroy command centers.
- Control logistics routes.

I would not decisively engage the 42nd but will fight a battle of attrition. I would want:

- Blocking force to prevent reinforcements.
- Fixing force to decisively engage the 42nd. Decisively engage means the enemy cannot move.
- Flanking force.

I don't have any metrics to go by, so I don't know if the Ukrainians can pull this off. I do hope they can pull this off.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Red1 said:

If I had to plan the attack on the Russian 42nd Division I would continue to:

- Destroy bridges or keep them destroyed.
- Destroy rail capabilities of the Russians.
- Destroy ammunition and supply depots.
- Destroy command centers.
- Control logistics routes.

I would not decisively engage the 42nd but will fight a battle of attrition. I would want:

- Blocking force to prevent reinforcements.
- Fixing force to decisively engage the 42nd. Decisively engage means the enemy cannot move.
- Flanking force.

I don't have any metrics to go by, so I don't know if the Ukrainians can pull this off. I do hope they can pull this off.


You wouldn't decisively engage them but you'd decisively engage them?
AgLA06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://gagadget.com/en/war/154802-atacms-replacement-lockheed-martin-is-developing-a-new-missile-for-himars-and-m270-with-a-range-of-up-to-650-km-it-wi-amp/
Red1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GAC06 said:

Red1 said:

If I had to plan the attack on the Russian 42nd Division I would continue to:

- Destroy bridges or keep them destroyed.
- Destroy rail capabilities of the Russians.
- Destroy ammunition and supply depots.
- Destroy command centers.
- Control logistics routes.

I would not decisively engage the 42nd but will fight a battle of attrition. I would want:

- Blocking force to prevent reinforcements.
- Eventually use a fixing force to decisively engage the 42nd. Decisively engage means the enemy cannot move.
- Flanking force.

I don't have any metrics to go by, so I don't know if the Ukrainians can pull this off. I do hope they can pull this off.


You wouldn't decisively engage them but you'd decisively engage them?



Red1
I would attrit them and eventually want to fix them.

Patton was known for decisively engaging and fixing the Germans with forward elements or fighter planes, so he could attack the Germans on his terms.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Red1 said:

If I had to plan the attack on the Russian 42nd Division I would continue to:

- Destroy bridges or keep them destroyed.
- Destroy rail capabilities of the Russians.
- Destroy ammunition and supply depots.
- Destroy command centers.
- Control logistics routes.

I would not decisively engage the 42nd but will fight a battle of attrition. I would want:

- Blocking force to prevent reinforcements.
- Fixing force to decisively engage the 42nd. Decisively engage means the enemy cannot move.
- Flanking force.

I don't have any metrics to go by, so I don't know if the Ukrainians can pull this off. I do hope they can pull this off.
the ballsiest move would be for Uke forces to debauch from the Odessa area and take small boats across the water to the part of Kherson Oblast SOUTH of the Dnipro River

that would cut the only link from Crimea and cause mass confusion. they would have to build up a position along the west coast of that peninsula and cut the highway from Crimea into Kherson.
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Explosions reported in several cities of Kherson region
https://liveuamap.com/en/2022/7-august-explosions-reported-in-several-cities-of-kherson



All highlighted icons were hit. This was reported 3 hours ago on LiveUAMap.
benchmark
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Red1 said:

I would attrit them and eventually want to fix them.

Patton was known for decisively engaging and fixing the Germans with forward elements or fighter planes, so he could attack the Germans on his terms.
Kinda lost in the semantics/analogies here ... but there's no need to attrit if the Orks wisely decide to leave Kherson voluntarily. My vote is to fix Kherson with only necessary and minimal engagement for the moment ... while pivoting east to take the dam at Novo Kakhovka. I know I'm a broken record on this but Kherson is political and the dam is strategic.
pluto29
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Red1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
benchmark said:

Red1 said:

I would attrit them and eventually want to fix them.

Patton was known for decisively engaging and fixing the Germans with forward elements or fighter planes, so he could attack the Germans on his terms.
Kinda lost in the semantics/analogies here ... but there's no need to attrit if the Orks wisely decide to leave Kherson voluntarily. My vote is to fix Kherson with only necessary and minimal engagement for the moment ... while pivoting east to take the dam at Novo Kakhovka. I know I'm a broken record on this but Kherson is political and the dam is strategic.

I don't know what the Russians want and can do. Competent Generals will wargame the situation and will develop the most likely Russian Course of Action (COA) and alternate Russian COAs and how to react to them. I am going to make the assumption some of our generals are guiding the Ukranian planners because we use this methodology when we plan for large operations.
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
black_ice
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ghost of Bisbee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ClifsNotes of this conflict since May?
-Ben There/R.C.
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ghost of Bizbee said:

ClifsNotes of this conflict since May?
  • Russia makes little gains for high cost
  • Ukraine has been getting more aid that is helping them severely screw with Russian logistics and C&C
  • Some areas are back-and-forth
  • Focus is switching from the East to the South and Northeast (but mostly South) due to Ukraine positioning troops for an offensive. Ukraine is now gaining some ground back in the East
  • A lot of other stuff I'm forgetting since a lot has gone on since May.
JFABNRGR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Waffledynamics said:

Ghost of Bizbee said:

ClifsNotes of this conflict since May?
  • Russia makes little gains for high cost
  • Ukraine has been getting more aid that is helping them severely screw with Russian logistics and C&C
  • Some areas are back-and-forth
  • Focus is switching from the East to the South and Northeast (but mostly South) due to Ukraine positioning troops for an offensive. Ukraine is now gaining some ground back in the East
  • A lot of other stuff I'm forgetting since a lot has gone on since May.

orc losses
  • 931 MBTs
  • 521 AFVs
  • 1152 IFVs
  • 321 IDF (artillery)
  • 38 fixed wing
  • 49 rotary wing
  • 104 drones

Orcs continue to attack civilian population areas with med/long range rockets and artillery. Areas they have taken they have mostly destroyed completely.
They now also occupy, shoot from, and store weaponry within the large Zapprizhia nuke plant.
To date it appears russia has zero regard for human life of either side.
recently burned up 50+ UKR POWs sickening.
black_ice
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ghost of Bizbee said:

ClifsNotes of this conflict since May?


Orcs castrated a Ukraine pow. Video is online.
lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
pluto29 said:


If ever there was a place to use nerve agents, this would be that place.
Ghost of Bisbee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JFABNRGR said:

Waffledynamics said:

Ghost of Bizbee said:

ClifsNotes of this conflict since May?
  • Russia makes little gains for high cost
  • Ukraine has been getting more aid that is helping them severely screw with Russian logistics and C&C
  • Some areas are back-and-forth
  • Focus is switching from the East to the South and Northeast (but mostly South) due to Ukraine positioning troops for an offensive. Ukraine is now gaining some ground back in the East
  • A lot of other stuff I'm forgetting since a lot has gone on since May.

orc losses
  • 931 MBTs
  • 521 AFVs
  • 1152 IFVs
  • 321 IDF (artillery)
  • 38 fixed wing
  • 49 rotary wing
  • 104 drones

Orcs continue to attack civilian population areas with med/long range rockets and artillery. Areas they have taken they have mostly destroyed completely.
They now also occupy, shoot from, and store weaponry within the large Zapprizhia nuke plant.
To date it appears russia has zero regard for human life of either side.
recently burned up 50+ UKR POWs sickening.



Thank you both. This is all since Putin put the butcher in command?
-Ben There/R.C.
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ghost of Bizbee said:

JFABNRGR said:

Waffledynamics said:

Ghost of Bizbee said:

ClifsNotes of this conflict since May?
  • Russia makes little gains for high cost
  • Ukraine has been getting more aid that is helping them severely screw with Russian logistics and C&C
  • Some areas are back-and-forth
  • Focus is switching from the East to the South and Northeast (but mostly South) due to Ukraine positioning troops for an offensive. Ukraine is now gaining some ground back in the East
  • A lot of other stuff I'm forgetting since a lot has gone on since May.

orc losses
  • 931 MBTs
  • 521 AFVs
  • 1152 IFVs
  • 321 IDF (artillery)
  • 38 fixed wing
  • 49 rotary wing
  • 104 drones

Orcs continue to attack civilian population areas with med/long range rockets and artillery. Areas they have taken they have mostly destroyed completely.
They now also occupy, shoot from, and store weaponry within the large Zapprizhia nuke plant.
To date it appears russia has zero regard for human life of either side.
recently burned up 50+ UKR POWs sickening.



Thank you both. This is all since Putin put the butcher in command?
Alexander Dvornikov? He's been relieved of his position as of late May.

https://www.yahoo.com/video/general-dvornikov-no-longer-command-155200379.html
Red1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am trying to put on the shoes of a Russian General:

- The ability to maneuver can be challenging.
- Logistics can suck.
- Centralized decision making slows down the process.
- The soldiers are ill trained and lack initiative and agility.
- The morale of the soldiers is low.
- The lack of capability to repair broken vehicles adds to the attrition.
- The army lacks the precision fires that Ukraine has.

Those are all fundamental tenets of an army, and I can't see how a general can turn the ship around considering all the flaws.
Ags4DaWin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You start leveling cities to the ground.

^^^this is the next step^^^

You find a way to either make it look like or create so much hatred on the Ukranian side that it they begin torturing and killing Russian POW's.

The you use this as an excuse to begin to wipe out entire population centers and carpet bomb them into the earth.

That is the only way to win at this point.

But Russia needs an excuse real or imagined to begin this phase of the campaign.
Ghost of Bisbee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Waffledynamics said:

Ghost of Bizbee said:

JFABNRGR said:

Waffledynamics said:

Ghost of Bizbee said:

ClifsNotes of this conflict since May?
  • Russia makes little gains for high cost
  • Ukraine has been getting more aid that is helping them severely screw with Russian logistics and C&C
  • Some areas are back-and-forth
  • Focus is switching from the East to the South and Northeast (but mostly South) due to Ukraine positioning troops for an offensive. Ukraine is now gaining some ground back in the East
  • A lot of other stuff I'm forgetting since a lot has gone on since May.

orc losses
  • 931 MBTs
  • 521 AFVs
  • 1152 IFVs
  • 321 IDF (artillery)
  • 38 fixed wing
  • 49 rotary wing
  • 104 drones

Orcs continue to attack civilian population areas with med/long range rockets and artillery. Areas they have taken they have mostly destroyed completely.
They now also occupy, shoot from, and store weaponry within the large Zapprizhia nuke plant.
To date it appears russia has zero regard for human life of either side.
recently burned up 50+ UKR POWs sickening.



Thank you both. This is all since Putin put the butcher in command?
Alexander Dvornikov? He's been relieved of his position as of late May.

https://www.yahoo.com/video/general-dvornikov-no-longer-command-155200379.html


Wow. What a ****show
-Ben There/R.C.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They do this to remove as much incentive as possible for Ukrainians to want to return to occupied territory.

The fewer Ukrainians, the easier it will be to maintain occupation and the more homes and infrastructure Russia destroys, the fewer Ukrainians they have to deal with. They want the land and resources, and also want the people but only the ones who would submit to Russian authority.

If they raze cities, yes it will be costly to rebuild, but they feel they can gradually do that and it possession of that land is wrath the cost.

It's really sad. I don't think I've seen a war with a strategy quite like this one in a long time.
benchmark
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
First report of AGM-88 HARM anti-radiation missiles. Usually they're air-launched but maybe not in Ukraine. Designed to home in on SAM radar. Interesting development.

ETA: Twitter link.

The Drive: Does Ukraine Now Have AGM-88 High-Speed Anti-Radiation Missiles?

Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Head of occupation authorities in parts Zaporizhzhia region signed a decree on referendum to join Russia


https://liveuamap.com/en/2022/8-august-head-of-occupation-authorities-in-parts-zaporizhzhia
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Red1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MouthBQ98 said:

They do this to remove as much incentive as possible for Ukrainians to want to return to occupied territory.

The fewer Ukrainians, the easier it will be to maintain occupation and the more homes and infrastructure Russia destroys, the fewer Ukrainians they have to deal with. They want the land and resources, and also want the people but only the ones who would submit to Russian authority.

If they raze cities, yes it will be costly to rebuild, but they feel they can gradually do that and it possession of that land is wrath the cost.

It's really sad. I don't think I've seen a war with a strategy quite like this one in a long time.

I think of Stalingrad when they bomb the cities.
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Explosions were reported in Uman as Ukrainian air defence shot down Russian cruise missiles


https://liveuamap.com/en/2022/8-august-explosions-were-reported-in-uman-as-ukrainian-air

Question about occurrences like this: are these cruise missiles usually fired one or two at a time, indicating that the air defense ended the threat (excepting falling debris), or is this more like destroying one out of several missiles with the rest hitting targets? As I understand, air defense basically fires its own rocket to hit an incoming cruise missile.

Obviously there are other caveats, but I'm trying to make sure I understand it on a basic level.
AgLA06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't think there is any way to answer that. Depends on how many targets they want to hit and how many are available.

They have ships and subs that could fire dozens at a time. Also have land based launchers they could congregate as many as they want together.

I believe the practice is to hit as many targets as possible, from as many directions as possible all at once to overwhelm air defenses and minimize interceptions (in a perfect worlds with lots of targets and plenty of weapons).

But this is Russia we're talking about. They've depleted many of their high tech weapons at this point, Ukraine is hiding / concealing targets much better than than Russia. As well as Ukraine still has a functioning air defense system and Russia doesn't seem as capable of having reconnaissance behind Uke lines as the Ukes have behind Russian lines.
benchmark
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Damage from last night's attack.

txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Waffledynamics said:

Quote:

Explosions were reported in Uman as Ukrainian air defence shot down Russian cruise missiles


https://liveuamap.com/en/2022/8-august-explosions-were-reported-in-uman-as-ukrainian-air

Question about occurrences like this: are these cruise missiles usually fired one or two at a time, indicating that the air defense ended the threat (excepting falling debris), or is this more like destroying one out of several missiles with the rest hitting targets? As I understand, air defense basically fires its own rocket to hit an incoming cruise missile.

Obviously there are other caveats, but I'm trying to make sure I understand it on a basic level.
It depends on where they are coming from. The subs in the Black Sea that they have been using carry 8 Kalibr missiles each I believe, but I am not sure if they are in vertical launchers or if they are launched through the torpedo tubes. If they are launched through the tubes, they may only be able to launch two at a time. Also, with only 8 on board, they may be reluctant to salvo the whole lot in one mission.
First Page Last Page
Page 691 of 1300
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.